Someone invites you into their house. You take pictures of the inside of said house.

[SMOGZINN]

I don't know how legal it is, but I promise you it will be the last time you are invited into my house.

 

[KLin]

Is this about a hoarder?

 

[Paladin3]

Opinion from a former news photog.

If the owner had been home, I'd think it would be fine as long as the owner or management of the property did not forbid filming/shooting.

However, if I'm reading this post correctly, the owner was not home. Also, presumably, the owner of the property allowed the "photographer" on to the premises unantennded to perform a specific task that, presumably, didn't include photographing the premises.

So I would think that the owner could seek recourse from the photographer since their reasonable expectation of privacy has been violated.

But the owner would also have to prove damages.

This.

As another former news photog, I ditto that it's all about the "reasonable expectation of privacy."

Why did the owner let you in the home? I'm pretty sure it wasn't to take photos and post them in efforts to shame them.

 

[Ns1]

thanks all.

 

[SMOGZINN]

Is this about a hoarder?

Hodor? Hodor!

 

[bearxor]

as another former news photog, i ditto that it's all about the "reasonable expectation of privacy."

news photogs represent!

 

[shortylickens]

Some states are single-party consent.