<rant>
<vent>
Someone tell me... when you pay thousands of dollars for hardware (and software) and not only does it crash under a relatively moderate load (>2000 concurrent call legs, sans media), but still exhibits very stupid flaws in common logic, what are we supposed to think?
Is it worth filing yet another case with TAC?
This should read:
</vent>
(*sigh*)
<vent>
gtss1(config-dial-peer)#do sh env
Temperature:
Temperature Reading:
Temp at inlet is measured as 23C/73F.
Temp at outlet is measured as 26C/78F.
Temp delta of inlet and outlet is measured as 3C/37F.
Temperature State:
Temperature is in normal state.
Voltage:
Voltage Reading:
MAX6656-1 Internal 3.3 Volt is measured as 3243.
Motherbd 5V is measured as 5171.
CPU Core 1.2V is measured as 1136.
Memory 2.5V is measured as 2464.
MAX6656-2 Internal 3.3 Volt is measured as 3243.
PHY 2.5V is measured as 2601.
HT, Crush FPGA 1.8V is measured as 1786.
PLD 1.5V is measured as 1419.
Voltage State:
Voltage is in 0 state.
Power Supply:
Redundant Power System is not present.
PS Input Voltage status: normal
PS Output Voltage status: normal
PS Fan status: normal
PS Thermal status: normal
PS OverVoltage status: normal
Someone tell me... when you pay thousands of dollars for hardware (and software) and not only does it crash under a relatively moderate load (>2000 concurrent call legs, sans media), but still exhibits very stupid flaws in common logic, what are we supposed to think?
Is it worth filing yet another case with TAC?
This should read:
</rant>Temp delta of inlet and outlet is measured as 3C/5F.
</vent>
(*sigh*)