Originally posted by: FallenHero
This thread is exactly why I stop trying to post logical arguments. You post them, laying out in the most simplist of terms why certain actions were taken and the reasoning behind everything, and either your posts are ignored or the dumb people do not understand them. Sigh, but what do I know about cops, firefighters, or rescue personal. I am only a silly law enforcement major, minoring in fire science with a firefighter brother and I only work in emergency service at school. Macbaine, your heart and mind are in the right place, and you reasoned through it very well. But give it up, the stupid people always seem to overwhelm those that know what they are talking about or have some semblence of intelligence. You just repeat yourself over and over again, and no matter how many times you do it, they wont understand. They never have, and never will. Their "gut reaction" is always right and you will forever be wrong. Our original arguments still stand and shoot down their vain attempts at dislodging them, but still they go on, babbling about topics they know nothing about, without even stopping to understand what we have said. And people wonder why Americans are considered dumb...its just because they refuse to listen. On my final note, I do believe that the man was stupid for going into the house to save his dog. I am glad that he was successful, and that the dog is ok. But the police and the firefighters both have a job to do, and they all took the course of action that is most appropriate for the situation. My arguments for this stance have been laid out in my previous posts, and I will stop posting in this thread unless someone raises an argument worthy of my attention. ~FallenHero~
yeah amen!Originally posted by: minendo
Let them arrest me, but I am going to save my dog and any other living animal.
Originally posted by: Marshallj
Originally posted by: Dr Smooth
He risked his life for his dog. He did not think about the consequences to his family if he had died in the fire. I probably would have chosen my family's well being over the dog.
You were not making his decision. He was. He chose to save his dog and he was successful at doing it.
You were also not there. You are not qualified to say that he "risked his life".
I love seeing how people won't even give this guy the benefit of the doubt, even though they weren't even there and don't know the details. You're so quick to condemn this guy.
Originally posted by: Moralpanic
I just saw the video... and that sure looked like a barbell to me. It's hard to see details from the camera's distant, but why couldn't it be? Mine looks exactly like that. And why would a firemen's hook be laying on his balcony when they haven't even been up there yet?
Originally posted by: Dr Smooth
Look at the picture of him, his little girl, and his dog:
(Picture). He chose the his dog over the well being of his little girl. Maybe you would make the same choice.
Also why are you being so hostile about this?
Originally posted by: CraigRT
yeah amen!Originally posted by: minendo Let them arrest me, but I am going to save my dog and any other living animal.
Originally posted by: LeeTJ
Another point
i watched the video and i noted MANY people said they had pets in the building. The cops basically told EVERYONE to stay back and only ONE person went after his dog.
What if others saw it and said, HEY i have pets in there to. let me go after MY pet.
would you have been pleased with the site of 10 to 15 (numbers out of my ass) go after their pets?? Do you imagine that ALL of those people would have made it safely??
If it was ONE house, ONE owner and ONE pet, mb it could be overlooked, BECAUSE it was an APARTMENT COMPLEX, MANY OWNERS and MANY PETS, you just cannot condone that type of action.
YOU CAN NOT. IT ENDANGERS TOO MANY LIVES. they also have to arrest him as a matter of principle.
Originally posted by: jjsole
If its a child, he's brave, if its a dog, he's <EM>stupid</em>.
Originally posted by: ergeorge
Originally posted by: jjsole
If its a child, he's brave, if its a dog, he's <EM>stupid</em>.
Yes, exactly.
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: ergeorge
Originally posted by: jjsole
If its a child, he's brave, if its a dog, he's <EM>stupid</em>.
Yes, exactly.
Well, if that's the case, I'd rather be stupid then let my dog bake.
Originally posted by: VFAA
and what if that dog saved your life from fire?
Originally posted by: ergeorge
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: ergeorge
Originally posted by: jjsole
If its a child, he's brave, if its a dog, he's <EM>stupid</em>.
Yes, exactly.
Well, if that's the case, I'd rather be stupid then let my dog bake.
shrug ... evolution in action.
My life and the well being of my family is worth far more then any dog. It would break my heart ... I love my dogs. But its not even a choice.
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: VFAA
and what if that dog saved your life from fire?
Then it would be a Disney movie
Originally posted by: Descartes
How the hell did he endanger everyone else? Are you telling me that firefighters aren't capable of realizing when they should discontinue their rescue attempt? If the man did indeed become trapped, are you saying that the firefighters would each follow suit and do the same? Please.
Lets put this another way: would you go after a close friend if they were trapped; your brother/sister? As others have said, I would definitely go for my friend/brother first, but I'd go after my two cats as well. You're not drawing a parallel between pets as constituents of your family, and that is blatantly obvious. Keep in mind that not everyone is like you, and that many people value their pets as family...
Originally posted by: rudder
Originally posted by: Descartes
How the hell did he endanger everyone else? Are you telling me that firefighters aren't capable of realizing when they should discontinue their rescue attempt? If the man did indeed become trapped, are you saying that the firefighters would each follow suit and do the same? Please.
Lets put this another way: would you go after a close friend if they were trapped; your brother/sister? As others have said, I would definitely go for my friend/brother first, but I'd go after my two cats as well. You're not drawing a parallel between pets as constituents of your family, and that is blatantly obvious. Keep in mind that not everyone is like you, and that many people value their pets as family...
He was very fortunate he did not kill anyone. He is not a firefighter. Imagine if he had busted out the patio window which then created a backdraft to where some firefighters were. Believe it or not there is a science to fighting fires. This story could have turned out much worse. Imagine if his actions caused a firefighter to die or get seriously burned. Then you would all be hanging this guy out to dry.
Originally posted by: VFAA
Originally posted by: rudder
Originally posted by: Descartes
How the hell did he endanger everyone else? Are you telling me that firefighters aren't capable of realizing when they should discontinue their rescue attempt? If the man did indeed become trapped, are you saying that the firefighters would each follow suit and do the same? Please.
Lets put this another way: would you go after a close friend if they were trapped; your brother/sister? As others have said, I would definitely go for my friend/brother first, but I'd go after my two cats as well. You're not drawing a parallel between pets as constituents of your family, and that is blatantly obvious. Keep in mind that not everyone is like you, and that many people value their pets as family...
He was very fortunate he did not kill anyone. He is not a firefighter. Imagine if he had busted out the patio window which then created a backdraft to where some firefighters were. Believe it or not there is a science to fighting fires. This story could have turned out much worse. Imagine if his actions caused a firefighter to die or get seriously burned. Then you would all be hanging this guy out to dry.
Backdraft was a great movie and the Fire Department only brought up that issue to make up an excuse to safety... How many cases do you know that recalls "backdraft"... Again fire fighters were not in the building not near it at the time, so they could not be injured in case an explosion occured. As far as the article says, fire fighters were occupied with the water hose for too long...