cronos
Diamond Member
- Nov 7, 2001
- 9,380
- 26
- 101
My perceptionis that the bully didn't have to delete his tweet. My perception is that the bully didn't have the integrity to stand up to the gate agent when she called him on his bullying.
He could have forced the issue. But he backed down.
So you'd rather he made a scene and *completely* ruin his family's travel plan? That makes no sense.
Did the gate agent act inappropriately? Absolutely.
So what.
Well sure, it's inappropriate, and the tweet was the direct consequence of that. Then what did she do? She pulled some string to bully back the original bully, forced him to leave the plane, and had him delete the tweet if he wanted to travel.
No one has a constitutional right to bully someone such as a gate agent.
People are human. People have flaws. He pushed gate agent past her limit.
That was his choice.
He told her he was going to continue to bully her on twitter.
She called him on it.
I'm okay with that.
I'm okay with that too. And I'm also okay with him announcing the whole fiasco to the world afterwards. That is the consequence of her deciding to call him out.
If he wants to go to court to defend his constitutional right to bully 'little people', like the gate agent with impunity, I'm okay with that as well.
Uno
I'm actually not okay with that. I think suing because of this is way overkill. But making the issue viral and make sure the world knows about it. Heck yes.
Now I'm not sure which sides we're arguing for as you ended up being okay with him suing, while I'm not ^_^