Fern
Elite Member
- Sep 30, 2003
- 26,907
- 173
- 106
I’m not aware of a single member of Congress calling for the public release of the report including grand jury deliberations or classified information. When people say the ‘full report’ it should be understood as ‘the full report minus things that would be illegal to include’.
-snip-
Numerous Congress persons have been clamoring for the "full release". Their words, not mine.
So now it's acceptable to say "full release" but not mean "full release"?
Are you claiming that the American public hears "full release" but understands "full release" doesn't mean full release? Damn, you give them a lot more credit than I.
Edit:
Speaking of bets (referring to your post above), anybody wanna bet there will be no complaints when the "full" comes out with redactions or ommissions?
Fern
Last edited: