Special "Perks" For Senators

T2T III

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
12,899
1
0
Senators Dodd and Dorgan apparently are, or will be under investigation due to some "preferential" treatment that they received from Countrywide mortgage.

Obviously, I've posted this from a reliable source. Two Democratic Senators under investigation at the same time for some "favors" that they received from Countrywide. My, my, my ... sneaky little guys. And, these guys are those who we should be looking up to. Sure Senator Stevens, a Republican, just received his lashing this past week - with a sentence to be received shortly. I wonder how Dodd and Dorgan will fare off this one? These guys get "special" treatment and they seem oblivious to the ethics issues when a flag gets raised?


The wide-ranging criminal investigation into wrongdoing at Countrywide - once the nation's largest mortgage originator - now includes serious scrutiny of a loan program that provided special mortgage deals to the well-connected and powerful, including two U.S. senators.

NBC News has learned that Robert Feinberg - a former Countrywide loan officer who handled what were known as the "VIP" mortgages - spent six hours last Thursday with a six-person team from the Justice Department. The team included prosecutors from the Public Integrity section, which handles investigations of possible public corruption.

"The Justice Department is making very serious inquiry into any possible wrongdoing that may involve (former Countrywide CEO) Angelo Mozilo, other Countrywide employees, Sen. Chris Dodd, Sen. Kent Conrad, (former Fannie Mae CEO) Franklin Raines or other public officials," said Feinberg's lawyer, Anthony Salerno. "Robert has always cooperated thoroughly with authorities and is strictly a witness in their investigation."

'Friends of Angelo's'
Salerno said the prosecutors and FBI agents seemed focused on whether the preferential treatment given to VIP customers was part of an effort by Countrywide to buy influence - as well as on the conduct of each public official who received a mortgage from Countrywide.

Feinberg says that Countrywide's clients in this program were known by a nickname.

"We called them F.O.A.'s," Feinberg told NBC News, "which were Friends of Angelo's."

"Angelo" is Countrywide's then-CEO, Angelo Mozilo, who once called an ordinary borrower's plea for help on his mortgage payments, "disgusting."

But Mozilo seemed to have a different attitude toward people of influence. In fact, Feinberg says part of his job was to hammer home to the VIP clients that they were getting special deals.

"You spoke in a manner that was different than you spoke with a regular customer," said Feinberg. "'Your loan has been specially priced by Angelo.' 'You're getting special discounts because you're in the VIP loan department."

So what would a "Friend of Angelo" get that an average customer would not? According to Feinberg, the possible benefits ran the gamut.

"They got a discount on the interest rate," said Feinberg. "They got discounts on their fees. They got a free floatdown option before closing."

In one instance of a "Friends of Angelo" deal, Mozilo sent an e-mail to Feinberg ordering him to "Take off one point" on a loan to Sen. Conrad. That one point equaled a savings of $10,700 in fees.

Feinberg's client list also runs the gamut. Among those benefitting from the VIP program were four former Cabinet members spanning Democratic and Republican administrations: Henry Cisneros, Richard Holbrooke, Alphonso Jackson, and Donna Shalala. Two former CEO's of Fannie Mae, James Johnson and Franklin Raines, heads of the government-sponsored entity which bought Countrywide's mortgages - also received VIP mortgages from Countrywide.

All have denied impropriety and declined to elaborate to NBC News. Some say they had no idea they were getting favorable rates or any sort of discount.

But Feinberg insists part of his job was to make clear to VIP's they were receiving special treatment.

"There were many, many taglines we used to let them know their level of importance to make sure that they understand where they're located," said Feinberg. "And nine times out of ten, once you mention 'VIP' the person's gonna ask you 'what am i getting for being in this VIP department?' Or 'what am I getting because I know Angelo?' Or 'I talked to Angelo and he said I'm getting this.'"

Senator Conrad says he never asked for, expected, nor was aware of any special treatment from Countrywide, and only found out about the discount after it had been reported in the press. He released and posted to his website all his mortgage documents, and donated all the money he saved to Habitat for Humanity.

Senator Dodd says he thought the VIP program just meant better customer service, and that he received market terms that he could have received from other lenders. The senator said in a press conference on the matter that if anyone had suggested at the time that he was receiving some kind of financial benefit on the loans because of his position, he would have terminated the relationship immediately.

Both Conrad and Dodd say they never sought any favors, and are cooperating with the Senate Ethics Committee investigation.

Feinberg says he's not aware of any discounts linked to favors, but he did see e-mails noting the potential value of the relationships to Countrywide's political and business interests. The e-mails noted one particular client was "of importance to Countrywide." Another encouraged a discount, noting "they are incredibly important to us." Yet another asked that the loan officer, "make an exception" in Countrywide's lending rules, "due to the fact that the borrower is a Senator."

Daniel Golden investigated the program for Condé Nast's Portfolio magazine.

"There was a great variety of people who got special deals," said Golden. "Many of them were figures in Congress or government or business partners of Countrywide - all of whom were in a position to help Countrywide in one way or another."

To Golden, the company's intention was clear.

"The purpose for Countrywide was to ingratiate itself with the people in Washington who might be able to help the company down the road," said Golden.

But was any of it illegal? Legal experts say prosecutors will be looking into whether Countrywide was trying to buy influence, and into whether public officials were taking improper gifts, or gifts they should have disclosed.

MSNBC Article
 

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
They should be punished just like Stevens and Larry "wide stance" Craig.

Noone except rabid partisans ever said the Republicans have a monopoly on corruption.
 

frostedflakes

Diamond Member
Mar 1, 2005
7,925
1
81
Good. I don't care what side of the aisle it's on, I can't stand all this fucking corruption in Congress. If they're guilty, let them burn.
 

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
Originally posted by: frostedflakes
Good. I don't care what side of the aisle it's on, I can't stand all this fucking corruption in Congress. If they're guilty, let them burn.

:thumbsup:
 

Budmantom

Lifer
Aug 17, 2002
13,103
1
81
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: frostedflakes
Good. I don't care what side of the aisle it's on, I can't stand all this fucking corruption in Congress. If they're guilty, let them burn.

:thumbsup:

Wouldn't it be safe to assume that they are all guilty? Let them all burn.
 

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
Originally posted by: frostedflakes
Good. I don't care what side of the aisle it's on, I can't stand all this fucking corruption in Congress. If they're guilty, let them burn.

Agreed... But there would be very few members left LOL.

Seriously, I would like to make a law that makes all money given to all congressman and senators illegal.

here is what we do. Give them public funds for campaigns and a HUGE salary... Like a millioon per year each, and watch all of thier financial records, making sure no money goes in that isnt supposed to, this way

A) its at least a lucrative job that the right people will want.
B) there is no motivation for corruption (because life in jail is the punishment)

Maybe with that hard core type law, they would actually work FOR the country instead of get rich off of it.
 

TallBill

Lifer
Apr 29, 2001
46,017
62
91
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Originally posted by: frostedflakes
Good. I don't care what side of the aisle it's on, I can't stand all this fucking corruption in Congress. If they're guilty, let them burn.

Agreed... But there would be very few members left LOL.

Seriously, I would like to make a law that makes all money given to all congressman and senators illegal.

here is what we do. Give them public funds for campaigns and a HUGE salary... Like a millioon per year each, and watch all of thier financial records, making sure no money goes in that isnt supposed to, this way

A) its at least a lucrative job that the right people will want.
B) there is no motivation for corruption (because life in jail is the punishment)

Maybe with that hard core type law, they would actually work FOR the country instead of get rich off of it.

Yeah, but it'd take congress to set up all of those laws.
 

Farang

Lifer
Jul 7, 2003
10,913
3
0
Damn I hope Dodd is found in the clear I've always liked him. If they find he is corrupt, though, burn him at the stake.
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,757
2,533
126
So you have already tried and convicted both of them, right T2T III?

I agree that an investigation may be warranted, but I've followed this from the start and the fact situation I've learned to date makes it very far from an open and shut case. Senator and Mrs. Dodd were refinancing their hom here in CT (a relatively modest home, BTW, well below the McMansion level). According to Dodd they never asked for any special treatment. At the closing they found about about the program Countrywide put them in for the first time. Not unusual at all from my real-life experiences with ordinary people.

During that era most of my professional earnings were doing closings for a large variety of lenders. It is not exaggeration to say that nearly every lender had a so-called special program for nearly every borrower-including us Joe Schmoes. It was marketing BS, pure and simple. It was also not unusual at all, during that time of intense competition and fluctuating interest rates, for lenders to cut rates even on the day of closing. I had it happen many, many times.

Make not doubt about it-I don't like Countrywide and probably never will. But you know what-Dodd is no great friend of them by any means either. For the last several years-well before the crisis surfaced-he has been publically knocking Countrywide and narrowing them out for special criticism. If this program was to buy his silence, it failed miserably.

Perhaps an investigation is warranted (just like literally hundreds of them are for members of the GWB administration) but this is certainly not a case to rush to premature condemnation.

Edit: PS-this is relatively old news-publically known since before Countrywide came close to failing and Bank of America took them over early this spring-no new developments-why raise it now, beside the fact that we are coming up on an election and to portray all Democrats as corrupt?

 

T2T III

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
12,899
1
0
Originally posted by: Thump553
So you have already tried and convicted both of them, right T2T III?
How have I reflected that I've already "tried and convicted" them? I posted the news. Read the comments that have followed by the other posters. They are the ones that believe the punishment should be applied accordingly.

Please don't put words in my mouth that I haven't said. And, no, I'm not bringing up old news. Why would I do that? MSNBC is the one that posted about it yesterday. You make it sound like I've gone through the archives of news from months back to generate this. I'll only try my best to post news that is "fresh" by the media, even though it may have been an on-going issue/investigation.

Thank you,

 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
A very strange issue and it has some resemblance to the very charge Senator Stevens was convicted on.

But a member of congress or the Senate is basically on equal footing with anyone else shopping for a mortgage. And the ordinary consumer usually shops around, looking for the best rate, and seldom takes the highest offer. And does not expect or ask for any special favors.

But in this case, countrywide had a special program, almost guaranteed to beat all other offers. And it was offered to Dodd and Conrad with no string attached, no free generator thrown in, and in return Countrywide asked for nothing definite in return except the implied goodwill they were generating. What was done was certainly a crime on the part of Countrywide, but a far more gray area for Conrad and Dodd. Not only must we ask, should they have known they were being bribed, but also we must ask did they know they were being bribed. This may be a questions that an ethic committee or a jury in a court of law may have to answer, but I would need more information first. Starting out with how much they saved over the next lowest offer.

I shall follow the issue, but I fail to see any horrendous wrong doing on the part of Dodd and Conrad.
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,757
2,533
126
Originally posted by: T2T III
How have I reflected that I've already "tried and convicted" them? * * *

Here's what you said:

My, my, my ... sneaky little guys. And, these guys are those who we should be looking up to. Sure Senator Stevens, a Republican, just received his lashing this past week - with a sentence to be received shortly. I wonder how Dodd and Dorgan will fare off this one? These guys get "special" treatment and they seem oblivious to the ethics issues when a flag gets raised?

Tell me, would you want a judge or jury to try you on any charge with the bias and prejudgment you so blatantly display?

Stevens has been tried by a judge and a jury after full trial with the right to cross exam. Huge difference from the prejudgment based on a news article that you so crassly display.

 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |