Or MT clock higher comparing to ST with r2000 seriesMaybe SMT is much more efficient on Zen2 than on Zen/Zen+ due to more execution resources?
Agreed, I’ll admit I’m negative Nancy regarding AMD, feels like they are experts at finding a way to screw something up.
I’ll also admit Dr. Su runs a tight ship.
TUM_APISAK tweeted about a 6c/12t, 42/36 Ryzen 5 3600.
New GN video apparently mentions a July 7 release date and some other bits of info, can't watch now. Also, there apparently won't be much revealed in terms of specs/pricing during the keynote?
Well right before he says "we have some new information on overclocking" so the 300W as a maximum are clearly if you push the 16C to the max.
But nice to hear that it'll be an early July launch.
Jim said that the 16C will stop at 140-150W with max OC?LOL, that's over twice what old Jim said.
* 16-core Ryzen 3000 CPUs, under AIO cooling, are allegedly pushing 300W (this was mentioned in the context of overclocking, but he didn't make it clear if this was overclocked or stock)
Jim said that the 16C will stop at 140-150W with max OC?
Doubt that. We're not talking about the power consumption @stock settings.
Ofc, that's pretty normal if you OC GPU's or CPU's to the max that the power consumption is abysmal and way higher.Old Jim claims at 135W at stock.
So do you think power consumption is going to more than double when overclocked?
Note the comma. Without it it would imply with performance as well. With it, it seems to mean that the 9900k uses as much power and that (the 9900k) has the performance as well. I had to re-read that line too.
I wonder how much power the i9 9900KS draws at stock...
Of course, we know they'll claim 95w TDP.
BTW, 9900KS is 5.0GHz all core at all times.
Yeah, that's what I meant. You get both a space heater and the highest performance desktop CPU so far, through brute force. Unlike the FX9590 and the P4 Emergency Edition, this approach works.
The 9900KS is exactly that very same 9900K manually OC'd to 5GHz. It'll be hilarious if they still relase it under the """"95w"""" tier.
Seems reasonable since it's a non-X with most likely 65W TDP.
The IO die should be taking ~ 1/3 the power?It's possible they put 65W TDP, or 45W maybe. I'm guessing many of these single chiplet SKU's are going to consume ~45W.
It whether 40W or 60W, it kind of depends how highly and hard they drive the base clock.
Whether it's safe to drive ~90W through a single chiplet continuously and over long term is another question. So if there are 95W TDP models, I somewhat doubt they will use that ceiling on the single chiplet models.
Well right before he says "we have some new information on overclocking" so the 300W as a maximum are clearly if you push the 16C to the max.
But nice to hear that it'll be an early July launch.
Dude you clearly have an agenda, and what is clear is your now just making things up.LOL, that's over twice what old Jim said.
I wonder how much power the i9 9900KS draws at stock...
Of course, we know they'll claim 95w TDP.
BTW, 9900KS is 5.0GHz all core at all times.
Yea the 9900ks is basically a factory overclocked 9900k...you don't even get any single core turbo increase, ridiculous to call this a new product.Yeah, that's what I meant. You get both a space heater and the highest performance desktop CPU so far, through brute force. Unlike the FX9590 and the P4 Emergency Edition, this approach works.
The 9900KS is exactly that very same 9900K manually OC'd to 5GHz. It'll be hilarious if they still relase it under the """"95w"""" tier.
Now Adored's on Twitter saying that he got told today that clocks will be much lower than he said they would be, but that the CPUs will still OC to 5GHz. Makes no sense to me, but let's wait and see.Dude you clearly have an agenda, and what is clear is your now just making things up.
Yea the 9900ks is basically a factory overclocked 9900k...you don't even get any single core turbo increase, ridiculous to call this a new product.
As for adored leaks, they were half a year ago, prices and naming can change, but we are getting IO die, we are getting 12 and 16 core cpus... Many simply laughed when he put that out there, if we really do get 5ghz ST turbo then he was as about as right as could be expected so far out, his information may also be months old by the time his leaker passed it on.
We will soon see.
Well we will see, I will be very disappointed if we don't match 9900k in ST performance and gaming...Now Adored's on Twitter saying that he got told today that clocks will be much lower than he said they would be, but that the CPUs will still OC to 5GHz. Makes no sense to me, but let's wait and see.
As for adored leaks, they were half a year ago, prices and naming can change, but we are getting IO die
Now Adored's on Twitter saying that he got told today that clocks will be much lower than he said they would be, but that the CPUs will still OC to 5GHz. Makes no sense to me, but let's wait and see.
Yea the 9900ks is basically a factory overclocked 9900k...you don't even get any single core turbo increase, ridiculous to call this a new product.
If they were over half a year ago, naming, prices, clocks and anything would not exist. AMD dosent do that, the product lineup, clocks and prices are decided at the very last moment. Just accept it.
I will be very disappointed if we don't match 9900k in ST performance and gaming..
Now Adored's on Twitter saying that he got told today that clocks will be much lower than he said they would be, but that the CPUs will still OC to 5GHz. Makes no sense to me, but let's wait and see.