zinfamous
No Lifer
- Jul 12, 2006
- 110,819
- 29,571
- 146
I don't think you're swinging against the right target, brother. Jan Jurden was an appointed judge when she sentenced one of the duPont heirs to probation for raping a three year old; last year she was appointed and confirmed to lead the Delaware Superior Court. Suzanne Delvechio was an appointed judge when she allowed a gay teacher to receive only probation in return for pleading guilty to raping a fifteen year old student; she was later appointed and confirmed as Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Court. Edward Cashman was an appointed Vermont judge when he sentenced an admitted serial child rapist to sixty days. There is no single outside factor for such judges - they are appointed and elected, Democrat and Republican, in very blue states and in very red states and in all shades of purple states. There might be consideration of wealth in as far as angering potential backers to move up or in buying enough legal talent to defend against conviction, but nothing that could possibly happen would ever make them look as bad in voters' eyes as these sham sentences. Failing to get a conviction in the face of formidable legal talent can be forgiven, but not these sentences.
Hey you know what? Those judges suck, too. And while you are building those strawmen over there, can we still agree that electing any judges is fucked up?