I've compared the Droid X2/Atrix to the Droid X and they were very different.
The major difference? Pentile.
http://www.droid-life.com/2011/05/2...x2-and-its-qhd-display-pentile-at-its-finest/
If Moto kept their S-LCD screens without the "pentile" part, they would still have one of the best screens on the market today IMO.
The people who keep saying Moto has the best screens/color reproduction available are still quoting that comparison on DisplayMate failing to realize that Moto has since changed how they do their screens after Droid X series phones.
http://www.displaymate.com/Smartphone_ShootOut_1.htm
I think DisplayMate needs to do an updated comparison of Droid X2/Atrix pentile to a Moto "non-pentile" Droid X, SAMOLED+, IPS, and Apple's Retina displays to settle this idea that pentile screens are superior once and for all.
I know plenty of people that upgraded from a Droid X to a Droid X2, only to return the phone because of the screen.
So yes, "pentile" qHD screens are currently a gimmick. Give me the screen found on the Droid X, attach qHD resolution to it without the "pentile" part.
I don't need my phone to look like a checkered board for sunlight visibility which is a minute point for me. I spend more time indoors than outdoors.
I wouldn't trade having a slight better visibility in sunlight for having a checkered board 24/7.
I would love to compare a Photon 4G to a Droid X2 to see if there's any improvement in how Moto does their pentile screens. Unfortunately, one phone is at a Sprint store, the other is at a Verizon store. And neither would let me walk out of the store with their phones to do a side by side comparison.