Kind'a interesting to see and hear about these ongoing travails of GZ post-acquittal.
I've also read some pretty interesting psychological analyses on GZ from an assortment of sites from the psych community.
But the one really interesting comment I read about the killing was how things could have turned out with opposite effect if TM had been similarly armed as GZ was. This made me reflect on the idea that GZ either assumed that TM was not carrying, thus had the advantage in a possible encounter or that GZ was willing to risk a shootout with TM to pursue his agenda, whatever that was.
Interesting too was the comment that GZ may have, consciously or not, wanted to provoke a confrontation simply for the fact that TM realized GZ was following him and wanted to respond to that act, whereas had GZ been more discrete, as his "eyes and ears" ROE required him to be, the confrontation would not have occurred.