It's fundamentally amazing how some people in this forum can't assimilate new information. A lot of people tried to tell you that GZ was a violent hothead (from his past information (arrest for police assault, domestic violence charge and bouncer stories)). And you guys made him out to be just a salt of the earth guy out to protect his neighborhood and who would rescue kittens from trees. They sold that bill of goods to the jury and he was acquitted.
So, he gets out, gets pulled over a couple of times for speeding, assaults his wife's dad, takes out a knife and cuts open an IPAD (who does that, but a psychopath), his wife divorces him, destroys his ex-wife's parents property, gets arrested for assaulting his girlfriend (who he then takes back), signs up to try to fight DMX (though I'm sure we were told by his defense team that he couldn't fight his way out of a paper bag), and now another story of him saying he would kill someone.
Yet even after everything we knew then that is now corroborated by everything we know now about how uncontrollable and violent GZ is, there are people in this forum who want to ignore all that and act like GZ controlled himself that night and all that he wanted to do was inform the police where TM was.
Please. From the moment he left his car till today, what good decisions has them man every made? My gosh.