CZroe
Lifer
- Jun 24, 2001
- 24,195
- 856
- 126
What the hell are you talking about, TPM got 56% on Rotten Tomatoes. You're just saying words and not backing anything up with any kind of empirical data.
Oh really? Did you even look at the date on half of those?
I've already cited Red Letter Media making the claim. I've already pointed to Roger Ebert. We've already discussed Kevin Smith's 180-degree change from his old opinion. There's no shortage of examples:
http://www.gamesradar.com/star-wars-episode-1-phantom-menace-reviews/
Even the official Star Wars website has a white-washing article on the phenomenon:
http://www.starwars.com/news/critical-opinion-the-phantom-menace-original-reviews
Someone has failed to back up their claims, but it ain't me.
Eberts follow-up to his 4.5 of 5 star SW EPI:TPM review explains the phenomenon perfectly:
http://www.rogerebert.com/rogers-journal/full-force-is-behind-effects-not-the-story
He says that camps are split into those impressed by the visuals and those who can't get over the other faults to enjoy it. What happens when technology progresses and the visuals no longer stand out? The camp that likes it for the visuals loses their voice/point and the true value of the movie for its remaining qualities becomes apparent.
Who's "just saying words" again?
Last edited: