heheh, I wonder if he has picked up his preorder, yet.
AT should REALLY not allow me to necro post. :awe:
After what WoW has become I won't be buying another Blizzard game. Their talent left and formed Flagship Studios.
Sweet, a Starcraft 2 thread bumped from 2007!
Is someone going to bump it again in another two years when SC2 still isn't out?
It's currently slated for Q2 2010, but I have my doubts. I mean we don't even have a beta yet.
How long ago now did that trailer come out? It's been 3 years or close to it I believe.
After what WoW has become I won't be buying another Blizzard game. Their talent left and formed Flagship Studios.
Beta's last what, 3-4 months with Blizzard? I'd like to see a Beta though.
Yeah it's still early but if we don't get a beta in the next 3 months, I really doubt it's going to make it this year.
"It's done when it's done."
Besides, deadlines are more like guidelines anyway, right?
I hear yah, but my excitement for SC2 has really waned these last few years - I'll still buy it, but damn it's not cutting edge tech or anything, it's going to start looking old soon.
They're planning at least two more releases for Protoss and Zerg with more or less the same engine, by 2012 or thereabouts I think this will look dated.
this is fvcken hilarious, dude!
My personal thoughts are that SC2 is so damn late, way-way later in stalled release than Warcraft 3, but War-3 was still in the safe zone in release. SC2 kind of looks sloppy and crappy, War-3 rip into outerspace.
Warhammer 40K has already done what SC2 is trying to accomplish, in many arrays.
But the campaign editor for SC2 should be incredibly awesome compared to the limited SC-1 editor.
I'd rather have Diablo 3 before Starcraft 2 as well, but I'm fairly certain that SC2 is the priority and D3 is still in nebulous "TBA, it's done when it's done" land.
Sounds like I won't be upgrading this year then. Back to the xbox!!!
No one said you had to upgrade anyway.
They already made it clear they want it to be playable on relatively weak systems.
Of course, they've said a lot of things over the years...........
Id rather have diablo3 over SC2 anyways.
No one said you had to upgrade anyway.
They already made it clear they want it to be playable on relatively weak systems.
Of course, they've said a lot of things over the years...........
I'm with Maximilian! Gamemakers always claim their stuff is playable if you
meet the low end requirements. Imo, 99% of the time doing so will mean a
sucky experience.
I'm with Maximilian! Gamemakers always claim their stuff is playable if you
meet the low end requirements. Imo, 99% of the time doing so will mean a
sucky experience.