Originally posted by: TridenT
So... is this the beginning of a movie or just a short movie or something? Anyway... Truly that carrier would have been fucking owned in the actual game. 3 battlecruisers vs 1 carrier? Gimmie a break.
Originally posted by: Elcs
Is it me or was that just poor? Graphically it looked extremely outdated, to the point at which I think the Diablo 2 cinematic was superior. Textures were not impressive at all.
That said, the content was good, solid and intriguing. Where were the Zerg?
Originally posted by: Elcs
Is it me or was that just poor? Graphically it looked extremely outdated, to the point at which I think the Diablo 2 cinematic was superior. Textures were not impressive at all.
That said, the content was good, solid and intriguing. Where were the Zerg?
Originally posted by: Qbah
Looked really nice. But since when do Carriers have a cannon like that? Or can crack a planet? Not to mention 3 battlecruisers would rip a Carrier to shreads
Though it did look really nice
Originally posted by: TridenT
So... is this the beginning of a movie or just a short movie or something? Anyway... Truly that carrier would have been fucking owned in the actual game. 3 battlecruisers vs 1 carrier? Gimmie a break.
Originally posted by: Qbah
Looked really nice. But since when do Carriers have a cannon like that? Or can crack a planet? Not to mention 3 battlecruisers would rip a Carrier to shreads
Though it did look really nice
However, a handful of heavily armed "super carriers" exist, most famously the Gantrithor. This was the flagship of Executor Tassadar when he led a protoss expeditionary force in its attempts to eradicate the zerg in terran space. The Gantrithor was powerful enough that it single-handedly defeated an entire terran battlecruiser squadron under the command of General Edmund Duke.
Originally posted by: RedArmy
Originally posted by: Elcs
Is it me or was that just poor? Graphically it looked extremely outdated, to the point at which I think the Diablo 2 cinematic was superior. Textures were not impressive at all.
That said, the content was good, solid and intriguing. Where were the Zerg?
I'll be sure to inform them that you express distaste in their fan-made cinematic that they made in their spare time.
Originally posted by: Piuc2020
Originally posted by: RedArmy
Originally posted by: Elcs
Is it me or was that just poor? Graphically it looked extremely outdated, to the point at which I think the Diablo 2 cinematic was superior. Textures were not impressive at all.
That said, the content was good, solid and intriguing. Where were the Zerg?
I'll be sure to inform them that you express distaste in their fan-made cinematic that they made in their spare time.
No one is saying their effort isn't admirable and no one is bashing these guys but what the **** does the fact it's fan made and done in spare time has anything to do with us criticizing the cinematic? If it looks poor then it looks poor, the fact it was done by a 4 year old in 10 minutes doesn't change anything, it's still poor, kudos to the 4-year old but objectively speaking, it's poor.
Originally posted by: RedArmy
Originally posted by: Piuc2020
Originally posted by: RedArmy
Originally posted by: Elcs
Is it me or was that just poor? Graphically it looked extremely outdated, to the point at which I think the Diablo 2 cinematic was superior. Textures were not impressive at all.
That said, the content was good, solid and intriguing. Where were the Zerg?
I'll be sure to inform them that you express distaste in their fan-made cinematic that they made in their spare time.
No one is saying their effort isn't admirable and no one is bashing these guys but what the **** does the fact it's fan made and done in spare time has anything to do with us criticizing the cinematic? If it looks poor then it looks poor, the fact it was done by a 4 year old in 10 minutes doesn't change anything, it's still poor, kudos to the 4-year old but objectively speaking, it's poor.
Because he compared it to the cinematic for Diablo II. Your whole argument falls apart after realizing that.
Originally posted by: Piuc2020
He's just comparing it to 9-year old cinematics for reference to make a point about outdated graphics, it doesn't matter if they were made for Blizzard, software and hardware today are much more versatile and it's still a valid comparison (beside he's only talking about graphics, not direction or anything), I fail to see how my argument falls apart just there.
Originally posted by: Piuc2020
Originally posted by: RedArmy
Originally posted by: Piuc2020
Originally posted by: RedArmy
Originally posted by: Elcs
Is it me or was that just poor? Graphically it looked extremely outdated, to the point at which I think the Diablo 2 cinematic was superior. Textures were not impressive at all.
That said, the content was good, solid and intriguing. Where were the Zerg?
I'll be sure to inform them that you express distaste in their fan-made cinematic that they made in their spare time.
No one is saying their effort isn't admirable and no one is bashing these guys but what the **** does the fact it's fan made and done in spare time has anything to do with us criticizing the cinematic? If it looks poor then it looks poor, the fact it was done by a 4 year old in 10 minutes doesn't change anything, it's still poor, kudos to the 4-year old but objectively speaking, it's poor.
Because he compared it to the cinematic for Diablo II. Your whole argument falls apart after realizing that.
He's just comparing it to 9-year old cinematics for reference to make a point about outdated graphics, it doesn't matter if they were made for Blizzard, software and hardware today are much more versatile and it's still a valid comparison (beside he's only talking about graphics, not direction or anything), I fail to see how my argument falls apart just there.
Originally posted by: RedArmy
Originally posted by: Piuc2020
Originally posted by: RedArmy
Originally posted by: Piuc2020
Originally posted by: RedArmy
Originally posted by: Elcs
Is it me or was that just poor? Graphically it looked extremely outdated, to the point at which I think the Diablo 2 cinematic was superior. Textures were not impressive at all.
That said, the content was good, solid and intriguing. Where were the Zerg?
I'll be sure to inform them that you express distaste in their fan-made cinematic that they made in their spare time.
No one is saying their effort isn't admirable and no one is bashing these guys but what the **** does the fact it's fan made and done in spare time has anything to do with us criticizing the cinematic? If it looks poor then it looks poor, the fact it was done by a 4 year old in 10 minutes doesn't change anything, it's still poor, kudos to the 4-year old but objectively speaking, it's poor.
Because he compared it to the cinematic for Diablo II. Your whole argument falls apart after realizing that.
He's just comparing it to 9-year old cinematics for reference to make a point about outdated graphics, it doesn't matter if they were made for Blizzard, software and hardware today are much more versatile and it's still a valid comparison (beside he's only talking about graphics, not direction or anything), I fail to see how my argument falls apart just there.
Ok, he directly compared a cinematic trailer from the leading video game development company to that done by fans in their spare time. If he had just said "I've seen better" then yeah, that's true. However, by this same logic, it's like saying "Oh, you only got an SL600? That's trash compared to my SLR Mclaren". No shit it is, the two are on completely different levels.
If you want to be on a level playing field then I'd like to see a different video made by fans of another game that's of this quality. However, I'm sure you're just one of those people who degrades something if it isn't the best of the best, judging by the logic you've shown us.
Originally posted by: Piuc2020
Originally posted by: RedArmy
Originally posted by: Piuc2020
Originally posted by: RedArmy
Originally posted by: Piuc2020
Originally posted by: RedArmy
Originally posted by: Elcs
Is it me or was that just poor? Graphically it looked extremely outdated, to the point at which I think the Diablo 2 cinematic was superior. Textures were not impressive at all.
That said, the content was good, solid and intriguing. Where were the Zerg?
I'll be sure to inform them that you express distaste in their fan-made cinematic that they made in their spare time.
No one is saying their effort isn't admirable and no one is bashing these guys but what the **** does the fact it's fan made and done in spare time has anything to do with us criticizing the cinematic? If it looks poor then it looks poor, the fact it was done by a 4 year old in 10 minutes doesn't change anything, it's still poor, kudos to the 4-year old but objectively speaking, it's poor.
Because he compared it to the cinematic for Diablo II. Your whole argument falls apart after realizing that.
He's just comparing it to 9-year old cinematics for reference to make a point about outdated graphics, it doesn't matter if they were made for Blizzard, software and hardware today are much more versatile and it's still a valid comparison (beside he's only talking about graphics, not direction or anything), I fail to see how my argument falls apart just there.
Ok, he directly compared a cinematic trailer from the leading video game development company to that done by fans in their spare time. If he had just said "I've seen better" then yeah, that's true. However, by this same logic, it's like saying "Oh, you only got an SL600? That's trash compared to my SLR Mclaren". No shit it is, the two are on completely different levels.
If you want to be on a level playing field then I'd like to see a different video made by fans of another game that's of this quality. However, I'm sure you're just one of those people who degrades something if it isn't the best of the best, judging by the logic you've shown us.
No one is degrading anything, I think the cinematic is an awesome effort and great job to these guys, I'm just saying that objectively speaking, this cinematic could be better graphically, even for fan-made content.
I don't see why you have to make it personal, I understand the circumstances of the cinematic and I agree, it's a great effort, but please, can we focus the discussion on the actual cinematic and not on the people who made it?
Originally posted by: Ichigo
Originally posted by: Piuc2020
Originally posted by: RedArmy
Originally posted by: Piuc2020
Originally posted by: RedArmy
Originally posted by: Piuc2020
Originally posted by: RedArmy
Originally posted by: Elcs
Is it me or was that just poor? Graphically it looked extremely outdated, to the point at which I think the Diablo 2 cinematic was superior. Textures were not impressive at all.
That said, the content was good, solid and intriguing. Where were the Zerg?
I'll be sure to inform them that you express distaste in their fan-made cinematic that they made in their spare time.
No one is saying their effort isn't admirable and no one is bashing these guys but what the **** does the fact it's fan made and done in spare time has anything to do with us criticizing the cinematic? If it looks poor then it looks poor, the fact it was done by a 4 year old in 10 minutes doesn't change anything, it's still poor, kudos to the 4-year old but objectively speaking, it's poor.
Because he compared it to the cinematic for Diablo II. Your whole argument falls apart after realizing that.
He's just comparing it to 9-year old cinematics for reference to make a point about outdated graphics, it doesn't matter if they were made for Blizzard, software and hardware today are much more versatile and it's still a valid comparison (beside he's only talking about graphics, not direction or anything), I fail to see how my argument falls apart just there.
Ok, he directly compared a cinematic trailer from the leading video game development company to that done by fans in their spare time. If he had just said "I've seen better" then yeah, that's true. However, by this same logic, it's like saying "Oh, you only got an SL600? That's trash compared to my SLR Mclaren". No shit it is, the two are on completely different levels.
If you want to be on a level playing field then I'd like to see a different video made by fans of another game that's of this quality. However, I'm sure you're just one of those people who degrades something if it isn't the best of the best, judging by the logic you've shown us.
No one is degrading anything, I think the cinematic is an awesome effort and great job to these guys, I'm just saying that objectively speaking, this cinematic could be better graphically, even for fan-made content.
I don't see why you have to make it personal, I understand the circumstances of the cinematic and I agree, it's a great effort, but please, can we focus the discussion on the actual cinematic and not on the people who made it?
How would you know? You spend your spare time on AT talking shit. You don't know anything about how this was made.