blurredvision
Lifer
- Oct 19, 2000
- 17,860
- 4
- 81
I would pick up Killing Floor and Serious Sam HD if they're back down to 5 and 10. Didn't jump on those and wish I would've.
Killing Floor is $5 right now.
I would pick up Killing Floor and Serious Sam HD if they're back down to 5 and 10. Didn't jump on those and wish I would've.
I think KOTOR is the only great game in the list (and an awesome deal), but the other three are good deals on decent to good games. I liked TQ the least of the four but I'm in the minority on that and would still say it's worth at least $10.
I actually preferred Torchlight, which I think is an enjoyable game for people who aren't into diablo-clones as well as those who are. It's less serious and more cartoony, but more fun as well with the exaggerated abilities and pet support/vendoring options. TQ just never really did it for me - I really hated the limited block inventory system and the fact that it's bigger and more complicated is a drawback not a bonus for me.I bought KOTOR in the black friday sale for 2,5$ Hehe, and TQ is a worthy game if you are into diablo-clones, way better than torchlight.
Considering the popularity of both titles I have wondered why LucasArts has never updated X-Wing or Tie-Fighter beyond the '98 texture mapping updates. ...
Heh, KOTOR is running like a dream for me. Even got the widescreen going though that was mainly out of curiousity since I can run the 1600x1200 natively too.
maybe the lower settings help you a bit but it was FAR from silky smooth in spots with E8500 at 3.16. I had to oc to 3.8 just to keep out of the low 20s for prolonged dips. his E7200 would be about the same or a tad slower than my E8500 at 2.4 and here is what I got at 1920x1080, high settings with view distance down to 10 and detail at 20.
E8500@ 2.4 33.27 fps
E8500@ 3.8 47.10 fps
sorry but that is not possible that you dont dip below 55 in this game especially with vsync on. I just fired up the game and ran all medium settings at 1280x800 and most certainly dipped in the mid to low 30s at times. and thats with my cpu at 3.8 and a gtx260. with my cpu at 3.0 I would still get in the low 30s to upper 20s at times with medium settings at 1280. theres no way you are staying at 55-60fps with your setup.The key difference is the resolution.
I do have a 1920x1200 resolution monitor, but I run the game at 1280x800 and it looks good.
But then again, I've played this game extensively on the 360 as well on a resolution no higher than 720p, so the experience is relatively the same. I max out my fps with vsync at 60 fps. Occasionally it dips to ~55fps in the areas of the city with a lot of shadows (near the starting area where there are tracks above the road), but other than that, it works well.
Considering the popularity of both titles I have wondered why LucasArts has never updated X-Wing or Tie-Fighter beyond the '98 texture mapping updates. Tie-Fighter is often seen at the top of lists recalling the greatest games of all time and I have to believe it would sell quite well on Steam at a $10-$20 price point if they updated it enough to run transparently in Vista/7 at high resolutions (1920x1200+). LucasArts is nothing if not good at milking their licenses so there must be more to the story than is public knowledge.
I wish I could get mine going at 1920x1200, I have to stay windowed right now which really sucks.
KT