Originally posted by: rodrigu3
So here's my problem...
My 120 ultra extreme base is 1) convex 2) grooved 3) Ni-plated
And my Intel IHS is concave and Zn/Ni-plated.
The thing is that the ultra extreme is VERY convex - if I sit it on a glass surface, it wobbles on the convex point; however, my intel IHS is not that concave. The contact between the two is not great. I haven't been able to test temps because the case I'm going to use for my build is not here. If I lap the 120 ultra extreme, I'm going to have to also lap the IHS. I know this voids my warranty - don't care much for the 120's warranty (it's a big hunk of metal - what would I call a warranty on), but the Intel warranty... I don't think I want to lap it until I know it works. I definitely want to lap so don't try to convince me otherwise, but should I test it first as is or should I go ahead and lap to get both flat. Getting just one flat will not help me. Let me know what you think.
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Not to rain on anyones parade but you should at least mention that lapping:
1.) likely wont make a large difference
2.) voids warrantys
The only reason i mention this is sometimes you do get a bad CPU with unusually high temps. You lap it. Temps dont go down because its a mis-mounted IHS. You cry.
Originally posted by: boglwe
Well, My q6600 runs at 72c+ while at 3.2 on a Scythe Ninja. I personally believe I have a bad chip. Will i RMA it? No. But i do wish i had a better chip. Will i lap it? Yes. I want to try everything. In about 3 months, Its a new chip anyways. Gotta learn.
Originally posted by: ArchAngel777
What do you (collective you) do is your business and I don't want to make someone a criminal for RMAing a poor CPU. But keep in mind whether or not Intel knows you did it, you know it. Therefore, it is your own integrity that you are jeapardizing.
Originally posted by: rodrigu3
Originally posted by: ArchAngel777
What do you (collective you) do is your business and I don't want to make someone a criminal for RMAing a poor CPU. But keep in mind whether or not Intel knows you did it, you know it. Therefore, it is your own integrity that you are jeapardizing.
Very very good point, I never thought about it from that perspective. Since I'm going to OC it anyway... I might as well go ahead and lap it too. Thanks for the insight.
Originally posted by: ArchAngel777
Originally posted by: boglwe
Well, My q6600 runs at 72c+ while at 3.2 on a Scythe Ninja. I personally believe I have a bad chip. Will i RMA it? No. But i do wish i had a better chip. Will i lap it? Yes. I want to try everything. In about 3 months, Its a new chip anyways. Gotta learn.
Bogle, it is true that some chips run hotters than others, but I also think there is a lot of misinformation out there. Check out the cases & cooling forum and read my post that I created it. Do the math and see if your system works out properly.
I found that my B3 did indeed run hot, but only when voltages were above default. When I brought all voltages back to stock (a drop of .1) I lost 200Mhz on my overclock (3.2 to 3) but was able to drop temps 10c across the board to my lowest possible idle (explain in that thread).
72c load isn't terrible for the overclock you have. I'd be interested to see if it can manage 3Ghz at stock and then retest it.
Originally posted by: boglwe
I wish i would have known that 3 days ago. But, I was board tonight and figured now is the best time. I also bought a new 250 caviar to place XP on. then duel boot to Vista 64. Anyways, It was a good time to lap. Here is a few pics of what I have now.
Before lapping
After 10 minutes @ 400 grit.
Just realized the blur, I will try and fix that for the next few photos.
EDIT:
After 10 minutes of 800 grit
The actual working sand paper, 800 grit.
EDIT 2:
after 10 minutes of 1000 grit. Note: there is a bit of reflection now.
The Screwdriver is there for reference only.
After 10 minutes of 1500 grit. We are finished.
Note:I gave my Heatsink a quik once over with 1500 grit to smooth it out as it was very level.
Side topic:
Just thought some people would like to see what my desk looks like.
Originally posted by: ArchAngel777
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Not to rain on anyones parade but you should at least mention that lapping:
1.) likely wont make a large difference
2.) voids warrantys
The only reason i mention this is sometimes you do get a bad CPU with unusually high temps. You lap it. Temps dont go down because its a mis-mounted IHS. You cry.
That is a very good point. However, I am not sure how ethical it is to RMA a CPU because it is simply running hot. That is the reason I decided to lap mine. I didn't feel right sending it back to NewEgg because it simply ran hotter than others. Most people concerned about the heat of their CPUs are overclocking and thus, it would be unethical to RMA a CPU because it was running hot when you overclocked it. Even if you just tested it O/C and decided to run it stock and was still running hot, you still overclocked it and thus voided your warranty.
Of course, I and many others have said "Yeah, but Intel won't know you overclocked it, but they will know if you lapped it" and one user responded in such a way that made me really think about it. I believe he said "True, but are you the type of person that will cheat the system?" after thinking about it, I decided I was not that type of person and decided to just keep my CPU since I overclocked it. I then decided to make the best and lapped it.
What do you (collective you) do is your business and I don't want to make someone a criminal for RMAing a poor CPU. But keep in mind whether or not Intel knows you did it, you know it. Therefore, it is your own integrity that you are jeapardizing.
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Originally posted by: ArchAngel777
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Not to rain on anyones parade but you should at least mention that lapping:
1.) likely wont make a large difference
2.) voids warrantys
The only reason i mention this is sometimes you do get a bad CPU with unusually high temps. You lap it. Temps dont go down because its a mis-mounted IHS. You cry.
That is a very good point. However, I am not sure how ethical it is to RMA a CPU because it is simply running hot. That is the reason I decided to lap mine. I didn't feel right sending it back to NewEgg because it simply ran hotter than others. Most people concerned about the heat of their CPUs are overclocking and thus, it would be unethical to RMA a CPU because it was running hot when you overclocked it. Even if you just tested it O/C and decided to run it stock and was still running hot, you still overclocked it and thus voided your warranty.
Of course, I and many others have said "Yeah, but Intel won't know you overclocked it, but they will know if you lapped it" and one user responded in such a way that made me really think about it. I believe he said "True, but are you the type of person that will cheat the system?" after thinking about it, I decided I was not that type of person and decided to just keep my CPU since I overclocked it. I then decided to make the best and lapped it.
What do you (collective you) do is your business and I don't want to make someone a criminal for RMAing a poor CPU. But keep in mind whether or not Intel knows you did it, you know it. Therefore, it is your own integrity that you are jeapardizing.
Well in the case of a mismounted IHS i would RMA it if it was hitting throttle temps with Prime Large FFTs on the stock heatsink.
Originally posted by: QuiksilverX1
For those who don't feel like searching around locally for sand paper for this or perhaps if the stores nearby are overpriced for it.
SVC Lapping Kit:
http://www.svc.com/lapkit-p.html
Frozen CPU:
http://www.frozencpu.com/produ...tsink_Lapping_Kit.html