Stephen Hawking is wrong, aliens wouldn't want our resources and would be friendly. .

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

HeXen

Diamond Member
Dec 13, 2009
7,832
38
91
we put reasonably intelligent creatures in cages, test on them..etc. I don't see why a highly advanced civ couldnt be thought to do the same to us.
 

pw38

Senior member
Apr 21, 2010
294
0
0
Only except Stephen Hawking doesn't just say we need to be careful. He outright declares that we should avoid all contact with extra terrestrials. His rationale for it stems straight from imperialism. His reasoning clearly stems from a belief that aliens would want our resources. If you toss that rationale out, then his whole hermit advice has no grounds.

"
Such scenes are speculative, but Hawking uses them to lead on to a serious point: that a few life forms could be intelligent and pose a threat. Hawking believes that contact with such a species could be devastating for humanity.
He suggests that aliens might simply raid Earth for its resources and then move on: “We only have to look at ourselves to see how intelligent life might develop into something we wouldn’t want to meet. I imagine they might exist in massive ships, having used up all the resources from their home planet. Such advanced aliens would perhaps become nomads, looking to conquer and colonise whatever planets they can reach.”
He concludes that trying to make contact with alien races is “a little too risky”. He said: “If aliens ever visit us, I think the outcome would be much as when Christopher Columbus first landed in America, which didn’t turn out very well for the Native Americans.”"

True, and he does have a point, assuming they do just want our resources. Why would they? Don't know, can't ask them. Doubt they'd understand me anyway if I did.
 

Duke of Nada

Junior Member
May 11, 2011
9
0
0
I can't think of any resources that we have here that isn't abundant through out the universe. Maybe water but isn't most comets made of it? They must be looking for the 6 food groups.
 

a123456

Senior member
Oct 26, 2006
885
0
0
I can't think of any resources that we have here that isn't abundant through out the universe. Maybe water but isn't most comets made of it? They must be looking for the 6 food groups.

Water is pretty abundant throughout the universe as are most light elements. Some of the heavier stuff is more rare but we don't have much. Who knows what they would be looking for?

As far as "resources" go, maybe they'll acquire a taste for fine dining on human brains or something, much like we randomly like to cook shark fin.
 

yhelothar

Lifer
Dec 11, 2002
18,408
39
91
Why not? Err on the side of caution. When it comes to the potential annihilation of your species you need to think twice about who you broadcast yourself out to. That's all Stephen Hawking was saying. Just be careful.

Realistically though it doesn't really matter because once you get outside our tiny sphere of influence the likelihood of us even being noticed by anyone else is very remote. As much as we've broadcast (intentionally or otherwise) the galaxy is so vast it'd be a miracle if any other sentient species noticed us yet. We give ourselves too much credit sometimes.

I agree with this, and like anything novel, while we are driven to explore it, we most certainly do err on the side of caution as expressed by Mr. Kubrick.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ML1OZCHixR0#t=1m49s
 
Last edited:
Sep 7, 2009
12,960
3
0
True, and he does have a point, assuming they do just want our resources. Why would they? Don't know, can't ask them. Doubt they'd understand me anyway if I did.


Tagged for later, but a quick comment..

Keep in mind that our earth's minerals and 'hard stuff' are not rare. There is little reason for any 'aliens' to need to mine anything, as if there was this type of need they would either eventually cease to exist due to rarity or would come up with an alternative. It is, imo, statistically unlikely that they would need to scour the universe for some precious metal. If this was the case it'd be a very brief moment in stellar history.



It seems much much more likely that they would want or need us for another type of need.. Entertainment, artwork, etc... Much in the same way our past civilizations are looked at for their amazing architecture, music, and so forth. These are things that no higher being or 'alien' can produce on their own.. Think something along the lines of a higher level mathematician being consciously unable to produce a painting or piece of music that truly stirs the soul. These are things no one can produce by combining other elements or randomly in the universe.



To me, the universe is clearly a large-scale experiment relying on random factors to produce something.
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
Tagged for later, but a quick comment..

Keep in mind that our earth's minerals and 'hard stuff' are not rare. There is little reason for any 'aliens' to need to mine anything, as if there was this type of need they would either eventually cease to exist due to rarity or would come up with an alternative. It is, imo, statistically unlikely that they would need to scour the universe for some precious metal. If this was the case it'd be a very brief moment in stellar history.



It seems much much more likely that they would want or need us for another type of need.. Entertainment, artwork, etc... Much in the same way our past civilizations are looked at for their amazing architecture, music, and so forth. These are things that no higher being or 'alien' can produce on their own.. Think something along the lines of a higher level mathematician being consciously unable to produce a painting or piece of music that truly stirs the soul. These are things no one can produce by combining other elements or randomly in the universe.



To me, the universe is clearly a large-scale experiment relying on random factors to produce something.
If the resources they required were not mineral in nature (such as liquid water or even manpower), they might have limited areas to search in galaxy. The reasons they might come to Earth could easily be "war"-like. This race has the ability to travel hundreds, if not thousands or millions, of light years to reach our planet. They could need a resource, want to expand their empire, simply fear future enemy. They could even want to steal a a technology or build an intergalactic super highway. Peace is largely a human concept. In most of nature, sharing resources stops when it is inconvenient and fighting erupts.

Not that it would matter the reason, if a warlike people came to Earth, our defenses would stand short of stopping them but a long shot. Their technology would be highly advance.
 

pw38

Senior member
Apr 21, 2010
294
0
0
If the resources they required were not mineral in nature (such as liquid water or even manpower), they might have limited areas to search in galaxy. The reasons they might come to Earth could easily be "war"-like. This race has the ability to travel hundreds, if not thousands or millions, of light years to reach our planet. They could need a resource, want to expand their empire, simply fear future enemy. They could even want to steal a a technology or build an intergalactic super highway. Peace is largely a human concept. In most of nature, sharing resources stops when it is inconvenient and fighting erupts.

Not that it would matter the reason, if a warlike people came to Earth, our defenses would stand short of stopping them but a long shot. Their technology would be highly advance.

If conquest is their ultimate goal then yes, what you said is true albeit highly understated. To say that more than likely we wouldn't stand a chance is an understatement. I highly doubt though they'd do what Hollywood depicts. We'd probably be long dead before they ever step "foot" on our world. Why risk themselves like that?
 
May 11, 2008
20,068
1,292
126
If the resources they required were not mineral in nature (such as liquid water or even manpower), they might have limited areas to search in galaxy. The reasons they might come to Earth could easily be "war"-like. This race has the ability to travel hundreds, if not thousands or millions, of light years to reach our planet. They could need a resource, want to expand their empire, simply fear future enemy. They could even want to steal a a technology or build an intergalactic super highway. Peace is largely a human concept. In most of nature, sharing resources stops when it is inconvenient and fighting erupts.

Not that it would matter the reason, if a warlike people came to Earth, our defenses would stand short of stopping them but a long shot. Their technology would be highly advance.

Currently humanity already has the technology to solve these kind of issues. Many of these have been around for 50 years.

It is just expensive and low efficiency.

Aliens that can space travel do not require to mine planets. Any asteroid will do and even open space.

To give you some idea of what is possible in space :

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-07-hydrogen-peroxide-space.html



(PhysOrg.com) -- Molecules of hydrogen peroxide have been found for the first time in interstellar space. The discovery gives clues about the chemical link between two molecules critical for life: water and oxygen. On Earth, hydrogen peroxide plays a key role in the chemistry of water and ozone in our planet’s atmosphere, and is familiar for its use as a disinfectant or to bleach hair blonde. Now it has been detected in space by astronomers using the ESO-operated APEX telescope in Chile.

An international team of astronomers made the discovery with the Atacama Pathfinder Experiment telescope (APEX), situated on the 5000-metre-high Chajnantor plateau in the Chilean Andes. They observed a region in our galaxy close to the star Rho Ophiuchi, about 400 light-years away. The region contains very cold (around -250 degrees Celsius), dense clouds of cosmic gas and dust, in which new stars are being born. The clouds are mostly made of hydrogen, but contain traces of other chemicals, and are prime targets for astronomers hunting for molecules in space. Telescopes such as APEX, which make observations of light at millimetre- and submillimetre-wavelengths, are ideal for detecting the signals from these molecules.

Now, the team has found the characteristic signature of light emitted by hydrogen peroxide, coming from part of the Rho Ophiuchi clouds.

“We were really excited to discover the signatures of hydrogen peroxide with APEX. We knew from laboratory experiments which wavelengths to look for, but the amount of hydrogen peroxide in the cloud is just one molecule for every ten billion hydrogen molecules, so the detection required very careful observations,” says Per Bergman, astronomer at Onsala Space Observatory in Sweden. Bergman is lead author of the study, which is published in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics.

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is a key molecule for both astronomers and chemists. Its formation is closely linked to two other familiar molecules, oxygen and water, which are critical for life. Because much of the water on our planet is thought to have originally formed in space, scientists are keen to understand how it is created.

Hydrogen peroxide is thought to form in space on the surfaces of cosmic dust grains — very fine particles similar to sand and soot — when hydrogen (H) is added to oxygen molecules (O2). A further reaction of the hydrogen peroxide with more hydrogen is one way to produce water (H2O). This new detection of hydrogen peroxide will therefore help astronomers better understand the formation of water in the Universe.

“We don’t understand yet how some of the most important molecules here on Earth are made in space. But our discovery of hydrogen peroxide with APEX seems to be showing us that cosmic dust is the missing ingredient in the process,” says Bérengère Parise, head of the Emmy Noether research group on star formation and astrochemistry at the Max-Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy in Germany, and a co-author of the paper.

To work out just how the origins of these important molecules are intertwined will need more observations of Rho Ophiuchi and other star-forming clouds with future telescopes such as the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) — and help from chemists in laboratories on Earth.

This research is published in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics.
 

beginner99

Diamond Member
Jun 2, 2009
5,223
1,598
136
Yes, but the main point, related to this thread, is that we're not out there giving tools to monkeys.

The thing is there just is a main difference between us and monkeys that makes us very different from them and possibly more similar to aliens. It's called Science. Or Scientific method. And Math. Reason and logic.

Interstellar space flight, we would have methods and technology to create such space ship. However it would cost too much to pay and were would it fly too? Random star and hope there is something useful there?

The problem is that "interstellar/relative space flight" is always a 1 direction trip only. because it's also a trip into the future. If you can go at like 99% of speed of light you could cross the universe in a human life but if you return the earth and sun would be gone.
So the problem is not the doing it but getting the discoveries of your trip back to you home planet. This is more or less impossible to solve.
 

Rebel_L

Senior member
Nov 9, 2009
451
63
91
I dont see how a space traveling species could be so different from us. If a species is to survive that long, concepts like community and peace have to be things they are familiar with or they would never advance or wipe themselves out long before mastering interstellar space travel. Traveling the galaxy to track down a signal from earth also means they have an inquisitive nature, and with so many things in common already communicating should certainly be possible.

If aliens are coming here because of a signal we sent out what possible reason would the have to come other than to see and explore, unless of course they are looking for some unreliable slave labor of course.
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
30,989
8,701
136
I can't think of any resources that we have here that isn't abundant through out the universe. Maybe water but isn't most comets made of it? They must be looking for the 6 food groups.

We have a habitable planet.

Assuming that these aliens have vaguely the same sort of biology as us why wouldnt they wipe us out and take over?

Its not like we'd agree to share the place as second class lifeforms.
 

z1ggy

Lifer
May 17, 2008
10,004
63
91
^^^^ The only way a specicies can survive long enough to master interstellar space travel is by being extremely aggressive, or extremely peaceful. Since they haven't blown us all to bits yet, I lean toward the latter. And nobody knows anything of their biology or their home land. Maybe resources to them are not resources to us, or vice versa.
 

pw38

Senior member
Apr 21, 2010
294
0
0
That article was hard to read. Let's spook the townsfolk. Git yer pitchforks ready!
 

sarsipias1234

Senior member
Oct 12, 2004
312
0
0
I always thought Stephen Hawking was wicked smart when it came to doing math and solving complicated problems. But when Stephen tries to theorize he does not impress me.
Just seems like he borrows a lot with no real new ideas.
And the whole alien thing is just nuts. Maybe he had a stroke.
 

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
11,172
3,868
136
The thing is there just is a main difference between us and monkeys that makes us very different from them and possibly more similar to aliens. It's called Science. Or Scientific method. And Math. Reason and logic.

Difference is that we have a language complexe enough to allow
for knowledge fast transmission from an individual to another.
Hence the ability to create science...
 

pw38

Senior member
Apr 21, 2010
294
0
0
The problem is that "interstellar/relative space flight" is always a 1 direction trip only. because it's also a trip into the future. If you can go at like 99% of speed of light you could cross the universe in a human life but if you return the earth and sun would be gone.
So the problem is not the doing it but getting the discoveries of your trip back to you home planet. This is more or less impossible to solve.

I would caution on the use of the term impossible when we don't even have a grip yet on what's improbable. Besides, who said an alien species that could visit us would use relativistic travel? Perhaps they've mastered using wormholes to travel across the universe?
 

Michael Meio

Member
Jul 2, 2011
48
0
0
I apologize for being unfamiliar with accurate terms to put in shorter the following:

There must be someone that formulated a principle which states that no line of technology will advance unrelated with other lines of technology. When one advances, it's in consonance with others and all feed and rely on such choreography to achieve higher levels.

Hence why you cannot put ignorance at the steering wheel.

If one considers the possibility of existence of a race being able of cosmic traveling, It is implied that such race not only has survived itself, but also has reached a level of technology advanced enough to manipulate resources, making them "undepletable".

At such levels, the simple idea of dependence on resources is out of the question.

Unless the questioned alien was a microbe; mindless and natural, It will just consume it all, annihilating it's possibility to find a new host, leaving us on square one: Nothing can survive by consuming everything for it will consume itself.

Or perhaps the alien is intelligent and advanced but just happens to be confronted to something absolutely unknown and exceptionally appealing which will suck away his will and fate, intelligence and reason, rendering a basically instinctive organism capable of ignoring the rules on which he founded survival. BTW, did you happen to know that women happen to have such effect on some people?. Anyway, such organism can be considered as a threat. An important one.

Nature is by far smarter than understanding and reason.

I'm afraid I'm contradicting a higher authority.
 

SMOGZINN

Lifer
Jun 17, 2005
14,218
4,446
136
If one considers the possibility of existence of a race being able of cosmic traveling, It is implied that such race not only has survived itself, but also has reached a level of technology advanced enough to manipulate resources, making them "undepletable".

At such levels, the simple idea of dependence on resources is out of the question.

Resources are always depleted. If I build a rocketship out of iron and launch it into space, I now have one rocketship worth of iron less then I use to have. If I keep building iron rocketships and launching them out to space I will eventually be out of iron. As populations grow, so does their resource needs. One billion people need a lot less titanium then one trillion people. No amount of manipulating resources will get around these facts. Eventually a species will have to go out looking for more resources.
 

exdeath

Lifer
Jan 29, 2004
13,679
10
81
If you can go at like 99% of speed of light you could cross the universe in a human life

No. It would take you over 4 years just to reach the nearest star.

It would take 100,000 years, or way over 1,000 human life times just to cross our own galaxy at .99c.

Just to get to the next major galaxy would take 2 million years of travel at .99c through completely empty intergalactic space devoid of any resources at all (no planets, asteroids, nebulas, stars, hydrogen, nothing).

And there are many billions of galaxies separated by tens and hundreds of millions and billions of lightyears.

Space is big. Longcat is long.

We need the capacity to go 1000s of times faster than the speed of light just to explore our own Milky Way in the span of a human life.

It's depressing really. There IS other intelligent life out there. There can't NOT be. And we will never know. Nor will they.
 
Last edited:

Ventanni

Golden Member
Jul 25, 2011
1,432
142
106
Hawkings is assuming that any life form capable of traversing the stars is millions of years more advanced than we are, and I feel that his assumptions are a bit wrong in that category. Allow me to explain.

1. Thanks to the advancements in both ground based and space based telescopes, our knowledge of extraterrestrial planets is leaps and bounds beyond what it was even 10 years ago. One of the key discoveries are planets orbiting around brown and red dwarf stars, which for a long time we never thought were capable of having a solar system of their own. Part of the reason for that is, of course, because we could never see them, as up until really only recently were we able to detect planets smaller than Jupiter-sized gas giants.

2. Now that we've figured out that planets do, in fact, orbit brown and red dwarf stars, we've begun taking a look at our Sun's neighborhood. Of the nearly 140 celestial objects within 20ly of our solar system, nearly 2/3rds are red and brown dwarfs. We're still searching, but the potential for planets is quite endless. We've already discovered quite a few, and as our optics improve, we're bound to discover many more.

3. Our solar neighborhood happens to rest within a relatively high metallicity section of the galaxy, so any life form capable of star travel wouldn't necessarily *need* to rape and pillage Earth for its minerals. Any lifeless planet, moon, or asteroid would do.

4. So that leaves us asking the possibilities; what kind of life forms are we looking at? If there are sentient races within 20ly of Earth, it's doubtful that they're living like gods and traversing the galaxy just for fun. They're likely either at or below our own level. If they're more advanced, then we're probably looking at a Type-1 or early Type-2 race that knows we're here, but doesn't find it economically viable to care.

5. Yes, I said economically viable. Let's assume for instance that all these grainy UFO pictures we keep seeing popping up around the globe are part of something, and the truth is is that we've been visited many times, as well as occasionally used as science projects from time to time. We know from various, but strikingly consistent reports that these so-called UFO's are quite advanced, very fast, but rarely actually interact with man-made objects. After all, you don't hear of airliners suddenly being shot down, do you? But, we do know that the level of activity has risen dramatically since the detonation of the atomic bomb. I'll leave that for your own interpretation, as I'm a man of hard facts, and there just aren't any.

6. So with that said, it's quite possibly something is out there. Our solar neighborhood supports the possibility of life, especially considering that any red or brown dwarf star is likely to be far older, and more stable, than our own Sun (ie, older civilizations). But we also know the basics of the laws of physics. Moving even a UFO spacecraft 18ly is going to require a large amount of energy. If our solar neighborhood is known to be rich in high value metals, why move an enormous army over vast distances to subjugate a planet that they know would put up quite a fight, when a simple asteroid will do? It would be the equivalent of landing the entire US military on Antarctica to fight a war. Can it be done? Sure. Would it be costly? You betcha it would, and for what reason?

In closing, there also begs the question that no one else has brought up. Hawking assumes that any alien race is going to be the only one out there. Has anyone ever thought that we might be one of several intelligent races within the vicinity of our own solar neighborhood? If so, then lack of alien contact might not just be for economic, but also for political and diplomatic reasons as well. Making contact means sharing of knowledge, and given own cunning, war-like tendencies, that may not be something they want to do.
 

Ventanni

Golden Member
Jul 25, 2011
1,432
142
106
One more thing to note, and this is my personal theory. Flame away!

If we were to be found, any alien race looking from the outside is going to notice Neptune and its gravitational effect it has on the surrounding dust cloud. Observing mineral levels isn't terribly difficult to do, and it's likely that if aliens were to visit our solar system, they would have eyed the fact that both the Earth and Moon are abundant in two things: Tritium and Deuterium, which are the two hydrogen molecules used for an easy nuclear fusion reaction. If we have been visited, then it's likely they were originally coming because we're an ideal refueling spot for them.

It just so happens to be that we live here too.
 

Michael Meio

Member
Jul 2, 2011
48
0
0
Resources are always depleted. If I build a rocketship out of iron and launch it into space, I now have one rocketship worth of iron less then I use to have. If I keep building iron rocketships and launching them out to space I will eventually be out of iron. As populations grow, so does their resource needs. One billion people need a lot less titanium then one trillion people. No amount of manipulating resources will get around these facts. Eventually a species will have to go out looking for more resources.

Before you depart on your iron rocketship, try for 10 seconds to imagine how much of advantage would a civilization or race have, say... 125'678.391 years ahead of that particular rocket technology and still you won't have a remote hint of what that means when you compare it to a cosmic scale in terms of time.

Then, you'll realize that iron or any other resource will be a complete nonsense for fueling a ship capable of awfully far less than mediocre distance traveling. Such ship can't rely on resources.. it must create them or convert from the abundant type. Of course, now it's "impossible".. just try to open your mind.. Say for example that at the year 234.567 ahead of your iron rocket, someone finds out that light has a werxomoliphenkian property unknown till then, which happens to alter matter heat exchange at a quantum level releasing warkolphulophorikal trenklomurfrets which can be stored and used at will as a propulsion motivator.

Any race or civilization which travel method relies on resources as we know them today, will take them exactly nowhere and their resources will deplete before they reach anything worth naming. It's a really big place. We go somewhere because we can, not the opposite.

So, before considering going out there to check for any resource, you will end up depleting what was initially intended to get you there and your race will unavoidably extinct or remain trapped in the same place, surviving itself till it discovers the werxomoliphenkian effect. It's population will only grow so far or end up in oblivion, or in it's best case, both. Just exactly as it is happening to us: we're destined there according to our path.. we have to find werxowhatever to avoid extinction. And we will. Not because science and technology are the answer to everything but because we will not stop and we only have a couple hundred years on the road.. multiply that by seven hundred and eighty four considering we survive ourselves and of course we will.
 
Last edited:
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |