Couldn't have happened to a more deserving guy.
http://www.cnn.com/2018/01/07/politics/read-bannon-full-statement/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2018/01/07/politics/read-bannon-full-statement/index.html
"Donald Trump, Jr. is both a patriot and a good man," read Bannon's statement, which CNN obtained Sunday from a source close to Bannon. "He has been relentless in his advocacy for his father and the agenda that has helped turn our country around.
Cause, like children, they didn’t know any better. Or something.Even more, summary of the link:
Meeting with the Russians in Trump Tower was wrong
Don Jr is a great patriot
Manaford was completely wrong for being in that meeting, almost a traitor
Don Jr is a great man
No mention why Manafort is wrong for being in that meeting but why Jared & Jr were not wrong for being IN THE SAME FUCKING MEETING
http://www.cnn.com/2018/01/07/politics/donald-trump-steve-bannon/index.html
Your guess is as good as mine at this point. I'm waiting for the remake of Towering Inferno starring this current batch of swamp monsters.If the book is fake like Republicans claim, what is Bannon apologizing for?
If the book is fake like Republicans claim, what is Bannon apologizing for?
Your guess is as good as mine at this point. I'm waiting for the remake of Towering Inferno starring this current batch of swamp monsters.
Only the genius knows for sure.I guess the question should now be why was this fake reporter given real high access to the WH?
He is actually a genius. Very few people are so gifted at being an idiot.Only the genius knows for sure.
The cuck moniker embodies the deep insecurity of the alt-right cultist contingent of Trump supporters. The ones where it is about the man more than anything else. Only makes sense that their ringleader Bannon is one himself, just like Trump and his insecurity over his tiny dick.
I guess it depends on what he's saying.Does the left find Steve Bannon to be a reliable source of information, a man that should be listened to, or do they not?
In our highly partisan atmosphere, both sides love throwing stuff like this in the other side's face because they can't claim bias. It just backfires though because the other side can just say "you never believed them before so why do you believe them now?" The problem with that lazy ass retort is that nobody on the original side is claiming that Bannon is some bastion of honesty, we just want to see how the other side dismisses it since they can't claim bias.I guess it depends on what he's saying.
I'll give the man one thing, he knows how to promote a book.
Does the left find Steve Bannon to be a reliable source of information, a man that should be listened to, or do they not?
Does the left find Steve Bannon to be a reliable source of information, a man that should be listened to, or do they not?
Does the left find Steve Bannon to be a reliable source of information, a man that should be listened to, or do they not?
Does the left find Steve Bannon to be a reliable source of information, a man that should be listened to, or do they not?
I don't consider him a reliable source of information. I'd put him at about the same level as Trump in terms of his honesty and reliability.Does the left find Steve Bannon to be a reliable source of information, a man that should be listened to, or do they not?
More reliable then Trump for sure but still a dirtbag.Does the left find Steve Bannon to be a reliable source of information, a man that should be listened to, or do they not?
Did he apologize because what he said wasn't true? Or because it was?Does the left find Steve Bannon to be a reliable source of information, a man that should be listened to, or do they not?