annomander
Member
- Jul 6, 2011
- 166
- 0
- 0
Sorry to burst your bubble, but Apple would use patented technology and copyrighted goods too. Why don't you look up who owned the copyright for "iPhone" before Apple appropriated it for itself. Silicon Valley works on the principle that it's easier to ask for forgiveness after than permission before. No tech company in their right mind is going to put its strategic objectives aside while it waits for permission from a potential competitor. If it waits, it's guaranteed to lose, while if it just goes ahead, there is a reasonably good chance that it can win in court or settle outside. And you, as consumer, are a beneficiary of that.
Sorry theres no bubble to burst. What I'm onabout is the way some people say I'm not buying from that company for some deed, but are quite happy to buy from other companys even if said other companys deeds are just as bad.
I just find it really funny and illogical and the only way I can fathom it is to think its some type of fanboy excuse to put some justification to their bias.
I don't stop buying from a product cause they have sued one company over patents, I buy products on if I like them no matter who develops or builds them.
I think the only time I'd stop buying products from a company was if they was involved in killing people, killing animals willfully or polluting/damaging the environment