<< I'll probably put Win2K on here, though. I can't stand this XP Home with all the Toshiba crap. Can anyone tell me any laptop-specific reasons why I shouldn't go back to Win2K? >>
If I were you, I would not throw away a perfectly good copy of XP and go back to Windows 2000. For one thing, the driver support in XP blows away 2000. I have used both operating systems, and XP is better than 2000. If you are concerned about the Toshiba stuff, guess what, do what you are supposed to do and go to Control Panel Add/Remove and remove it. Takes all of about five minutes. If you don't like the extra icons on the desktop, delete them. This takes about ten seconds. The only part where Windows 2000 might have it over XP is if you need to be part of a network domain. You need XP Pro for this. The vast majority of home users don't need to be part of a domain. In my opinion, XP is more tweakable than 2000. First thing I always do is right mouse click on My Computer and choose properties. Under the performance tab, I turn off everything except for smooth screen fonts. This turns off most the the so called XP "eye candy"and gives snappier performance.
If you do go with Windows 2000, be prepared to find drivers for chip set, graphics, etc. 2000 probably does not have built in support.
The notebook comes with an XP version which can only be reinstalled by wiping the drive. You can however reinstall some of the individual apps separately. It also comes with a Lotus install disk.
Below is cache information from WinCPUID. Maybe someone with a real PIII can tell the difference.
[ WCPUID Version 3.0f (c) 1996-2002 By H.Oda! ]
$$--- Cache Information (Processor #1)
[L1 Information]
Instruct.Cache : 16K byte cache size 4-way set associative 32 byte line size
Instruct. TLB : 4K byte pages 4-way set associative 32 entries
: 4M byte pages fully associative 2 entries
Data Cache : 16K byte cache size 4-way set associative 32 byte line size
Data TLB : 4K byte pages 4-way set associative 64 entries
: 4M byte pages fully associative 8 entries
[L2 Information]
Level 2 Cache : 256K byte cache size 8-way set associative 32 byte cache line
##--- Date 03/17/2002, Time 09:40:47
I agree about not knowing how much different this CPU is from the real PIII chips. The only thing I can think of is the cache is less associative than it's big brother.
I've been running this system for a week and nary a hickup. It is stable as heck. Don't let anyone convince you to throw away a perfectly good copy of XP.