Actually knowing Mooselmans because you're not a scared, terrified bigot, now means that you give them money and oral sex.
Because if a bigoted cowardly scumbag believes it, it's true.
Actually knowing Mooselmans because you're not a scared, terrified bigot, now means that you give them money and oral sex.I actually know muslims in contrast to only reading about them on news outlets for rubes.
Because if a bigoted cowardly scumbag believes it, it's true.
That's what I said.
Islam is the most racist religion on earth. They want to chop the head of of everyone they hate, and that is just about everyone.
You're an idiot.
You're an idiot.
Instead of the usual "insult the detractor" schtick, how about you PROVE him wrong with some facts... quotes... statistics... anything?
...
...anything??
You're just lying at this point.To be fair, Islam doesn't relent on the whole kill-the-pagan/atheist/rape victim/non-god's-current-favoured-denomination/commandment breaker/etc.
But, well, it's the same gig with Christianity and Judaism. It's odd, that some of the more outspoken lads against Islam are Christians. 'Tis hypocrisy well 'n' pure.
To be fair, Islam doesn't relent on the whole kill-the-pagan/atheist/rape victim/non-god's-current-favoured-denomination/commandment breaker/etc.
But, well, it's the same gig with Christianity and Judaism. It's odd, that some of the more outspoken lads against Islam are Christians. 'Tis hypocrisy well 'n' pure.
You really think Christianity has killed/tortured/raped as many people as Islam has? Over 1400 years? In the last 100?
Equal, eh?
Islam is the most racist religion on earth. They want to chop the head of of everyone they hate, and that is just about everyone.
You're an idiot.
Germans were mostly christians.
Germans were mostly christians.
Idiot said Muslims want to cut off people's heads.Instead of the usual "insult the detractor" schtick, how about you PROVE him wrong with some facts... quotes... statistics... anything?
...
...anything??
Got anything from this century?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Reich_Church
"Persecution of the Catholic Church in Germany followed the Nazi takeover. Hitler moved quickly to eliminate Political Catholicism."
"Many historians believed that Hitler and the Nazis intended to eradicate Christianity in Germany after winning victory in the war."
(etc.)
Not really, no. A hijacked and reprogrammed version of Christianity... mayyybe.
Nice try.
Anyone else amused by the automatic assumption that American = Christian, therefore any atrocity is done as a religious act in Jesus' name?
No, the church never sent these people out to do Christ's bidding.
The same cannot be said for islam.
Anyone else amused by the automatic assumption that American = Christian, therefore any atrocity is done as a religious act in Jesus' name?
No, the church never sent these people out to do Christ's bidding.
The same cannot be said for islam.
The desperate attempts at moral equivalence do get rather pathetic.
Has anyone *ever* in history been swayed by nonsense like: "Yeah, you know, some attrocity committed by a group very loosely related to my nation/state/community back in the 12th century DIRECTLY relates to attrocities committed just yesterday by people directly related to a group that hasn't moved past a 12th century mindset"
The day you can point me to American civlians routinely going to other countries and blowing up restarants full of women and children because "Obama (or whichever leader) told me to do it" is the day you'll have a legitimate moral equivalence argument.In a sense you're correct, the west as of late has in large part moved on from using religion as a primary motivator, substituting the state instead now.
So instead of "god wants me to kill these people", they say "the leader/citizens/etc wants me to kill these people", and commit the act without any more forethought or remorse all the same.
Then they think of themselves as much more advanced, which would be so much funnier if it weren't so sad from the perspective of actually advanced people.
The day you can point me to American civlians routinely going to other countries and blowing up restarants full of women and children because "Obama (or whichever leader) told me to do it" is the day you'll have a legitimate moral equivalence argument.
Until then, you're just making excuses for what Islamic terrorists actually ARE doing.
There is no modern western equivalent.
Citing something as stupid as Nazi Germany, as if virtually anyone non-german, and under the age of say, 90 feels any pang what-so-ever for that because of whatever bone stupid connection you might have imagined (Nazis= western power, ME= live in a western power, I feel responsible!!) is just complete bullshit.
It's like expecting a Chinese person to feel guilty for Pearl Harbor and Kamikazis because (dem bof asians!!)
So Iraq and Vietnam are your desperate attempts at an equivalent to modern Muslim terrorism?
Your argument is so desperate you have to pretend no one knows the difference between military action and terrorism (hint: Muslin nations have militaries too) so you have to just grasp at straws and hope something works.
Pretty sad, but then your task of defending Muslim terrorism with pure bullshit is a thankless one. But hey, someone has to be a useful idiot.