Street Fighter IV Benchmark

[Barfo]

Originally posted by: Marty502

Originally posted by: Barfo
WTF? 400 MB download just to know if you can run the game? does it at least render some pretty scenes or something?

Oh yeah.

3 full fights with great effects, plus a close up of all the classic Street Fighter II characters.

At full detail, it kills the console versions!

Ok thanks, I'm interested in downloading now

 

[QueBert]

Originally posted by: zerocool84

Originally posted by: QueBert

Originally posted by: zerocool84

Originally posted by: QueBert
SCORE: 7835
AVERAGE: 33.84FPS
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6550 @ 2.33GHz
Memory: 2046MB
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT (Prerelease - WDDM 1.1)
Display Setting: 1024x768 75Hz

I got a D, and I have no AA or anything enabled. looks like it's time to upgrade my video card

And overclock your E6550. You could get it to 2.8GHz without a sweat.

When I OC funny shit happens to my system, sometimes when I turn it on, it will stay on for a second, and restart itself a few times before I actually get my POST. And sometimes it says OC'ing failed. I have a pretty good Heatsink and my temps are good, never tried to push it too hard on the OC. I think 2.5 and it starts throwing a bitch at me. My board doesn't exactly have a ton of OC'ing options. MSI Neo something or other p35. I might give it another shot. Maybe I can boost my SF:IV benchmark score up to a C lol.

Bump up your voltage on your processor a little. When it resets it means the OC failed.

I updated my BIOS and it's working like a charm now, set my FSB for 400 and re ran the benchmark program

SCORE: 8480
AVERAGE: 41.56FPS
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6550 @ 2.33GHz
Memory: 2046MB
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT (Prerelease - WDDM 1.1)
Display Setting: 1024x768 75Hz

(c)CAPCOM U.S.A., INC. 2008, 2009 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

bumped my rating up to a C, pretty decent FPS jump too. The MSI Dual Core proggy & my system properties are showing 400 FSB and it's switching between 2400MHz and 2800MHz (wtf?) in the Dual Core program, and Windows 7 is reporting 2.33GHz. I don't know if this is a problem with Windows 7, or just something screwy with my system. I didn't see any clock multiplier options in my BIOS. So I'm guessing this CPU is locked. I should probably spend some time to figure out if there's a problem with my system I guess.

*edit* I rebooted and in my BIOS it's showing 400x7 2.80GHz I wonder if Windows 7 is just reporting it wrong. CPU-Z is also showing it as between 2.47 - 2.51 with a x 6 multiplier though. WTF lol. *sigh*

 

[eggrolls]

Q6600 @ 2.4GHz
4GB RAM
9600GSO 384MB (96 shaders) at 650/1625/1900 (core/shader/ram)
1680x1050

Ran the benchmark a few times:

0xAA 16xAF everything else max = 60.36 FPS / A
(changing "extra touch" settings affects average FPS no more than +/- 5 FPS)

4xAA 16xAF everything else max = 30.98 FPS / D
(2xAA gives similar results)

0xAA 16xAF background max, everything else one step down from max = 97.92 FPS / A
(if background is turned down, there's no background at all)

So I just made the bare minimum for the "A" rating. Not bad for a $36AR card

 

[buzzsaw13]

Originally posted by: QueBert

Originally posted by: zerocool84

Originally posted by: QueBert

Originally posted by: zerocool84

Originally posted by: QueBert
SCORE: 7835
AVERAGE: 33.84FPS
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6550 @ 2.33GHz
Memory: 2046MB
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT (Prerelease - WDDM 1.1)
Display Setting: 1024x768 75Hz

I got a D, and I have no AA or anything enabled. looks like it's time to upgrade my video card

And overclock your E6550. You could get it to 2.8GHz without a sweat.

When I OC funny shit happens to my system, sometimes when I turn it on, it will stay on for a second, and restart itself a few times before I actually get my POST. And sometimes it says OC'ing failed. I have a pretty good Heatsink and my temps are good, never tried to push it too hard on the OC. I think 2.5 and it starts throwing a bitch at me. My board doesn't exactly have a ton of OC'ing options. MSI Neo something or other p35. I might give it another shot. Maybe I can boost my SF:IV benchmark score up to a C lol.

Bump up your voltage on your processor a little. When it resets it means the OC failed.

I updated my BIOS and it's working like a charm now, set my FSB for 400 and re ran the benchmark program

SCORE: 8480
AVERAGE: 41.56FPS
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6550 @ 2.33GHz
Memory: 2046MB
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT (Prerelease - WDDM 1.1)
Display Setting: 1024x768 75Hz

(c)CAPCOM U.S.A., INC. 2008, 2009 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

bumped my rating up to a C, pretty decent FPS jump too. The MSI Dual Core proggy & my system properties are showing 400 FSB and it's switching between 2400MHz and 2800MHz (wtf?) in the Dual Core program, and Windows 7 is reporting 2.33GHz. I don't know if this is a problem with Windows 7, or just something screwy with my system. I didn't see any clock multiplier options in my BIOS. So I'm guessing this CPU is locked. I should probably spend some time to figure out if there's a problem with my system I guess.

*edit* I rebooted and in my BIOS it's showing 400x7 2.80GHz I wonder if Windows 7 is just reporting it wrong. CPU-Z is also showing it as between 2.47 - 2.51 with a x 6 multiplier though. WTF lol. *sigh*

You need to turn off the power saving bullcrap in your bios as well, I think it was called like C1E or something.

 

[drebo]

Default settings (shadows and motion blur set to low, particles to medium, 0 AA, 0 AF):

SCORE: 9377
AVERAGE: 60.68FPS
OS: Windows XP Professional
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6400+
Memory: 2046MB
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT/GTO
Display Setting: 1680x1050 60Hz

Everything to high, 4x AA, 0 AF:

SCORE: 5063
AVERAGE: 33.91FPS
OS: Windows XP Professional
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6400+
Memory: 2046MB
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT/GTO
Display Setting: 1680x1050 60Hz 4xAA

Needless to say, with my old ass hardware, I was suitably impressed. No reason to upgrade in the near future.

 

[allies]

Originally posted by: drebo
Default settings (shadows and motion blur set to low, particles to medium, 0 AA, 0 AF):

SCORE: 9377
AVERAGE: 60.68FPS
OS: Windows XP Professional
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6400+
Memory: 2046MB
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT/GTO
Display Setting: 1680x1050 60Hz

Everything to high, 4x AA, 0 AF:

SCORE: 5063
AVERAGE: 33.91FPS
OS: Windows XP Professional
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6400+
Memory: 2046MB
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT/GTO
Display Setting: 1680x1050 60Hz 4xAA

Needless to say, with my old ass hardware, I was suitably impressed. No reason to upgrade in the near future.

No reason to upgrade if all you're gonna be doing is playing SF4

 

[drebo]

I tend to find that modern games are incredibly underwhelming. Why am I going to spend hundreds of dollars and several hours of install and tune time in order to play a game that has maybe 6 hours of legitimate game play time?

The games that I play run perfectly fine on this card, and if the modern games that I might be interested in play well too, why bother? I'm one that prefers gameplay to graphics. In fact, I still break out Castle of the Winds every now and again for a quick runthrough.

 

[Marty502]

SCORE: 9010
AVERAGE: 69.87FPS
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 3800+
Memory: 3072MB
Graphics Card: ATI Radeon HD 4670
Display Setting: 1680x1050 60Hz

No AA, 16xAF and all settings cranked including shadows to max.

This humble rig still has some muscle.
I see no reasons to upgrade by now either!

 

[Barfo]

SCORE: 13669
AVERAGE: 128.64FPS
OS: Windows Vista(TM) Home Premium
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz
Memory: 4094MB
Graphics Card: ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series
Display Setting: 1280x1024 60Hz



SCORE: 7811
AVERAGE: 82.56FPS
OS: Windows Vista(TM) Home Premium
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz
Memory: 4094MB
Graphics Card: ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series
Display Setting: 1280x1024 60Hz 8xAA

Pretty awesome, I can get away with 8xAA, 16xAF and all settings maxed, can't wait to play this

 

[ShawnD1]

Interesting benchmark. At lowest settings, an E6600 is limited to 350fps. If background quality is set to high instead of low, it drops to about 200. At 720p resolution at maximum quality not including shadows, it runs at about 100fps on a GeForce 7950GT.

Capcom is a really good company when it comes to making games playable. Even if the game sucks, nobody can say it's unplayable. Devil May Cry 4 was like this; you could run that on the worst computer ever and it would work.

 

[ImDonly1]

SCORE: 6327
AVERAGE: 58.33FPS
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz
Memory: 4096MB
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
Display Setting: 1440x900 60Hz C16xQAA

Max settings such as AA-16xQ and AF maxed. No V-sync though.

Here is with same settings except with V-sync turned on.

SCORE: 6232
AVERAGE: 56.57FPS
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz
Memory: 4096MB
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
Display Setting: 1440x900 60Hz C16xQAA

 

[ArchAngel777]

SCORE: 9111
AVERAGE: 82.54FPS
OS: Windows Vista X64 Ultimate
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 3.6Ghz
Memory: 4096MB
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
Display Setting: 1680x1050 60Hz 4XAA

All Settings as high as they could go and Transparancy Super Sampling Forced in CP.

The funny part is that at the end, it told me "Your system is efficient, you may want to consider turning up the settings' and I went back and nothing can go higher. Hehe...

I am not a fan of cell shading. However, it does seem to have a 3D Look to it...

 

[rocadelpunk]

All settings on max except for AA at 4x. vsync on.

SCORE: 5641
AVERAGE: 47.54FPS
OS: Windows Vista(TM) Ultimate
CPU: AMD Processor model unknown (phenom 2 quad core at 2.8ghz)
Memory: 2046MB
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
Display Setting: 1920x1080 60Hz 4xAA

(c)CAPCOM U.S.A., INC. 2008, 2009 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

 

[evident]

when the hell is this damn game going out so i can sell my PS3 already!!!!!

 

[Makaveli]

I think I saw a release date of July 7th for this game.

 

[Makaveli]

Originally posted by: Marty502

Originally posted by: Barfo
WTF? 400 MB download just to know if you can run the game? does it at least render some pretty scenes or something?

Oh yeah.

3 full fights with great effects, plus a close up of all the classic Street Fighter II characters.

At full detail, it kills the console versions!

While I think it will be superior to the console version it doesn't kill it.

When I play SF4 on my 46inch 1080p on X360 it looks just as good.

The one difference I can see tho is the pc version has higher quality textures which are noticeable if you look for it in the backgrounds with everything on high on the PC.

And apparently the X360 version of the game is slightly better graphically than the PS3, which i'm not too surprised about since the Video system in the 360 is better than the one in the PS3. Capcom did such a goodjob, its hard to see the differences between the console versions tho so kudos to them.

 

[Modelworks]

Did some testing and it seems all you need is a cpu at around 2.4Ghz .
It is not using multiple cores , 1, 2 , 3, 4 cores result in same fps. It is mainly dependent on the video card.

 

[vj8usa]

Originally posted by: Barfo
SCORE: 13669
AVERAGE: 128.64FPS
OS: Windows Vista(TM) Home Premium
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz
Memory: 4094MB
Graphics Card: ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series
Display Setting: 1280x1024 60Hz

I decided to run at the same resolution you used to try to compare CPUs (since you're using a 4850 as well).

With the settings in my sig (3375MHz):

SCORE: 16172
AVERAGE: 137.17FPS
OS: Windows Vista(TM) Business
CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU E2160 @ 1.80GHz
Memory: 6142MB
Graphics Card: ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series
Display Setting: 1280x1024 60Hz

That came as a pleasant surprise to me; I always figured a stock E8400 would be able to beat my 65nm core2 with its puny 1MB cache.
I forced speedstep on and ran it again at 2250MHz:

SCORE: 14726
AVERAGE: 119.55FPS

Looks like this game needs very little CPU power. The actual fight scenes had a much higher framerate than that ring of standing fighters at the end. Maybe it was calculating AI for all of them, even though they weren't moving?

Oh, and the "score" number makes very little sense to me. I'm not sure how that's calculated.

 

[QueBert]

I know it's not running Windows, but isn't the arcade unit just a C2D 2.4GHz with an 8600GT? I remember reading that somewhere.

 

[vj8usa]

Originally posted by: QueBert
I know it's not running Windows, but isn't the arcade unit just a C2D 2.4GHz with an 8600GT? I remember reading that somewhere.

According to wikipedia, it runs on the Taito Type X², which runs Windows XP (Embedded). The most powerful hardware it supports (again according to wikipedia) are an E6400 and a 7900GS.
Full specs here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T...e_X#Taito_Type_X.C2.B2

 

[LittleNemoNES]

I got 59.9 FPs average @
1920x1200
2x2 SS + 16x CSAA
16xAF
Everything else max



The benchmark was a great idea. I think I may pick this one out when it is done.

Since it is on PC I imagine there will be sound mods to change the music for some classic music too!


Rig:
i7 @ 3.4 Ghz
GTX 280
12GB RAM

 

[I4AT]

Ok, so this is really weird. When I overclock my CPU my performance actually goes down...?

E5200 @ 2.5ghz = 62.45fps
E5200 @ 2.625ghz = 59.5fps
E5200 @ 2.812ghz = 55.54fps
E5200 @ 3ghz = 52.08fps

Then I actually underclocked to see what would happen.

E5200 @ 2.375ghz = 65.71fps

Wtf?

Update: Took the CPU down to 2.087ghz and got 74.73fps. Something is very fucking wrong with this game.

 

[minmaster]

that's insane... should i bust out my old P4?

 

[TridenT]

Originally posted by: minmaster
that's insane... should i bust out my old P4?

Get out your Pentium II maybe?

 

[AzN]

1920x1080 16QAA max settings

System in my sig. Getting about 80fps average.