I think that would benefit from an operational definition of "attitude".
If a person is psychotic, is it for us to decide that it is not reality that the government has implanted a communication chip inside their skull?
What if a person is in frank denial? Or perhaps a person that has projected their rage onto another to absolve themselves from it?
We cannot contain all of ourselves within. Those that try often have poor boundaries and take responsibility for the failure of others to do the same. To contain themselves, they must find ways to be gratified in doing so. This can be highly functional, mind you. Objectively, who would deny that Mother Theresa or Ghandi were masochists? But they are celebrated nonetheless, and I believe they experienced much gratification in their suffering.
In working with patients, beyond a high threshold of risk of harm to self or other, I aim to merely bring people to the point of understanding their ability to choose which psychic reality is best for them, not to provide them with the correct "attitude".
But society is not my patient. Society's philosophy and laws influence strongly the psychic reality of the persons born within it. And, for that, I am not neutral. I want for the world a psychic reality with a full and rich internal experience, one whose pursuit of that is reinforced by the nature of the society itself.
I read somewhere that in the Apocrypha, Jesus said, Did you but suffer you would not suffer. It seems that is what happened to me. It seems also to be the reason that psychoanalysis can succeed. To suffer, I think, is to come to feel what one actually feels, that we live in an unconscious state of suffering. Reading your post I would also have to say that whether patient or society, you want to save all sentient beings even if the way you put it may be differently.
I have to consider what you say. You seemed to have introduced an ambivalence toward your understanding of what you write followed by a response indicating the reverse which tempts me to react in a contrary fashion without first appreciating what you say. I believe doing so would be a mistaken enactment of your past experiences.
Nonetheless, I will need time to consider things before approaching them more neutrally.