OMG!!! The SNL dude is a racist??? :QMichael Meyers, the coalition's executive director, who initiated the survey, said Thursday that such programs are paternalistic and racist,
I was thinking the guy from the halloween movies!Originally posted by: Scarpozzi
OMG!!! The SNL dude is a racist??? :QMichael Meyers, the coalition's executive director, who initiated the survey, said Thursday that such programs are paternalistic and racist,
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Wow I'm shocked. I always thought that racism was the answer to racism!
Not at all. They're not saying the intent is to stigmatize minority populations, they're saying that is the unintended consequence of these policies, and I don't find much disputable about that.True, but to say that pairing up a minority freshman with an upper-class minority is to "provid[ing] remedial services specifically geared toward minorities, stigmatizing minority populations" is twisting just a *tad* bit.
No sh1t, but this has NOTHING to do with minority mentoring. The problem for such stigmatization is the affirmative action policy.Ask any black in college whether they have encountered the stigma that they got in based on their race
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Wow I'm shocked. I always thought that racism was the answer to racism!
Originally posted by: BlipBlop
I went to a school very much like the schools surveyed, was active in student politics, and am myself a minority - there were NEVER any complaints that minority mentoring equated to a de-facto remedial program or was itself responsible for stigmatization.
Ok, where's your study? This panel studied the issue and concluded something different than you. I'm more than amendable if you want to give me the study you conducted which concludes something different.As usual Tscenter, you don't read or think. I AGREE that a stigmatization exists, but NOT because of programs like minority mentoring.
No complaints that you were willing to acknowledge. Are you sure you were paying all that much attention, since being the beneficiary of such policies can have a way of making you hardened and indifferent to critics of such policies.I went to a school very much like the schools surveyed, was active in student politics, and am myself a minority - there were NEVER any complaints that minority mentoring equated to a de-facto remedial program or was itself responsible for stigmatization.
Originally posted by: Stark
People need crutches when they have been injured, not after they've fully healed.
amenOriginally posted by: Stark
It seems like affirmative action has about run its course. 60 minutes did a story against it last night.
If you think about it, affirmative action made sense after jim crow laws and the oppression minorities faced prior to the 60's and 70's. To think that these programs are no longer needed means that we are finally making progress as a culture.
People need crutches when they have been injured, not after they've fully healed.
Originally posted by: lowtech
Reveres racism is everywhere. We have government & the union that force equality upon people by demanding woman & ethic minority at the work place, which in my book is blatantly wrong. We have Asian parent that think all white girls/women are whores therefore don?t fit to mate with their sons.
It was wrong that the forefather of the dominant culture to stepped on the minority, and it is equally wrong for the minority children to prosecute the children of the dominating culture that has nothing to do with it except for the color of their skin or sex.
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: lowtech
Reveres racism is everywhere. We have government & the union that force equality upon people by demanding woman & ethic minority at the work place, which in my book is blatantly wrong. We have Asian parent that think all white girls/women are whores therefore don?t fit to mate with their sons.
It was wrong that the forefather of the dominant culture to stepped on the minority, and it is equally wrong for the minority children to prosecute the children of the dominating culture that has nothing to do with it except for the color of their skin or sex.
There is no such thing as reverse racism.
There was more going on than whites enslaving blacks (not saying any of it was right).
Originally posted by: Zakath15
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: lowtech
Reveres racism is everywhere. We have government & the union that force equality upon people by demanding woman & ethic minority at the work place, which in my book is blatantly wrong. We have Asian parent that think all white girls/women are whores therefore don?t fit to mate with their sons.
It was wrong that the forefather of the dominant culture to stepped on the minority, and it is equally wrong for the minority children to prosecute the children of the dominating culture that has nothing to do with it except for the color of their skin or sex.
There is no such thing as reverse racism.
There was more going on than whites enslaving blacks (not saying any of it was right).
While no one gives a rip, that is one aspect of the entire debate that I disagree with. This idea that racism only qualifies as real racism if it's white-on-(insert minority here). The definition of racism is "Discrimination or prejudice based on race." If that's the case, if I'm discriminated against because I'm white, that is discrimination, not somehow "reverse" discrimination.
Small point.
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: Zakath15
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: lowtech
Reveres racism is everywhere. We have government & the union that force equality upon people by demanding woman & ethic minority at the work place, which in my book is blatantly wrong. We have Asian parent that think all white girls/women are whores therefore don?t fit to mate with their sons.
It was wrong that the forefather of the dominant culture to stepped on the minority, and it is equally wrong for the minority children to prosecute the children of the dominating culture that has nothing to do with it except for the color of their skin or sex.
There is no such thing as reverse racism.
There was more going on than whites enslaving blacks (not saying any of it was right).
While no one gives a rip, that is one aspect of the entire debate that I disagree with. This idea that racism only qualifies as real racism if it's white-on-(insert minority here). The definition of racism is "Discrimination or prejudice based on race." If that's the case, if I'm discriminated against because I'm white, that is discrimination, not somehow "reverse" discrimination.
Small point.
That was my point explained
Originally posted by: Zakath15
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: Zakath15
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: lowtech
Reveres racism is everywhere. We have government & the union that force equality upon people by demanding woman & ethic minority at the work place, which in my book is blatantly wrong. We have Asian parent that think all white girls/women are whores therefore don?t fit to mate with their sons.
It was wrong that the forefather of the dominant culture to stepped on the minority, and it is equally wrong for the minority children to prosecute the children of the dominating culture that has nothing to do with it except for the color of their skin or sex.
There is no such thing as reverse racism.
There was more going on than whites enslaving blacks (not saying any of it was right).
While no one gives a rip, that is one aspect of the entire debate that I disagree with. This idea that racism only qualifies as real racism if it's white-on-(insert minority here). The definition of racism is "Discrimination or prejudice based on race." If that's the case, if I'm discriminated against because I'm white, that is discrimination, not somehow "reverse" discrimination.
Small point.
That was my point explained
Tee hee. I'm tired.
<--- last final tomorow, w00t!