Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Archaeologists, scholars dispute Jesus documentary
It's on CNN's front page today.
"They just want to get money for it," Kloner said.
Originally posted by: ahurtt
As a screen writer, I am sure that James Cameron is very familiar with the dramatic element known as irony. Thus, he will not be surprised when he is murdered by Christian fundamentalists in the not too distant future.
Originally posted by: Queasy
Originally posted by: ahurtt
As a screen writer, I am sure that James Cameron is very familiar with the dramatic element known as irony. Thus, he will not be surprised when he is murdered by Christian fundamentalists in the not too distant future.
If he were to be making this documentary disproving something about the prophet Mohammed, then I'm pretty sure his life would be in danger. Christian bashing is nothing new however. Even "fundies" don't rise to violence over it (rarely if ever).
Originally posted by: ahurtt
Originally posted by: Queasy
Originally posted by: ahurtt
As a screen writer, I am sure that James Cameron is very familiar with the dramatic element known as irony. Thus, he will not be surprised when he is murdered by Christian fundamentalists in the not too distant future.
If he were to be making this documentary disproving something about the prophet Mohammed, then I'm pretty sure his life would be in danger. Christian bashing is nothing new however. Even "fundies" don't rise to violence over it (rarely if ever).
It only takes 1. And every now and again one will blow up an abortion clinic or kill doctors who perform abortion so they are definitely out there.
Originally posted by: engineereeyore
Perhaps this has already been covered and I missed it, but is there some reason for the idea that he wasn't resurrected, or is that just something they're adding in there? I don't see what his having a wife or a child would have to do with that.
Please let me know if this question was already raised.
Originally posted by: bignateyk
Originally posted by: engineereeyore
Perhaps this has already been covered and I missed it, but is there some reason for the idea that he wasn't resurrected, or is that just something they're adding in there? I don't see what his having a wife or a child would have to do with that.
Please let me know if this question was already raised.
Im pretty sure its just something that they threw in there without any actual evidence to back it up. They are trying to use evidence for something completely different as a way to gain credibility to throw out a completely unjustified statement.
Originally posted by: meltdown75
Maybe they compared his DNA to the DNA they found on Jesus' blinged-out crunk juice cup. Because you know he was rockin' one of those.
Damn straight, and all the lepers get sweet grills!Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: meltdown75
Maybe they compared his DNA to the DNA they found on Jesus' blinged-out crunk juice cup. Because you know he was rockin' one of those.
And spinners on the caravans!
- M4H
Originally posted by: engineereeyore
Perhaps this has already been covered and I missed it, but is there some reason for the idea that he wasn't resurrected, or is that just something they're adding in there? I don't see what his having a wife or a child would have to do with that.
Please let me know if this question was already raised.
Originally posted by: chuckywang
Geez when is Cameron going to make another MOVIE.
Originally posted by: Triumph
Originally posted by: engineereeyore
Perhaps this has already been covered and I missed it, but is there some reason for the idea that he wasn't resurrected, or is that just something they're adding in there? I don't see what his having a wife or a child would have to do with that.
Please let me know if this question was already raised.
I guess they're trying to say that since here is a body, he can't have been resurrected and ascended to heaven (the Ascension) in said body. That's my guess.
Originally posted by: WHAMPOM
Originally posted by: ivol07
But film-makers Cameron and Jacobovici claim to have amassed evidence through DNA tests
When did we get a sample of Jesus' DNA to compare?
Shroud of Touron(Turin, OK, I will spell it your way.)? Edit: Hitler's mythical spear of conquest? Christ's real body, stolen from the tomb after the Crucifiction and buried under the Vatican in the catacombes?
Originally posted by: Accipiter22
Originally posted by: WHAMPOM
Originally posted by: ivol07
But film-makers Cameron and Jacobovici claim to have amassed evidence through DNA tests
When did we get a sample of Jesus' DNA to compare?
Shroud of Touron? Edit: Hitler's mythical spear of conquest? Christ's real body, stolen from the tomb after the Crucifiction and buried under the Vatican in the catacombes?
Shroud Of Turrin has never been proven to be of Jesus...Unsolved Mysteries did a show on it, and the people that tested the DNA said that it was only about 800-1000 years old at the time of testing.
Originally posted by: Triumph
Originally posted by: engineereeyore
Perhaps this has already been covered and I missed it, but is there some reason for the idea that he wasn't resurrected, or is that just something they're adding in there? I don't see what his having a wife or a child would have to do with that.
Please let me know if this question was already raised.
I guess they're trying to say that since here is a body, he can't have been resurrected and ascended to heaven (the Ascension) in said body. That's my guess.
Originally posted by: Siddhartha
Originally posted by: jimmyj68
Everyday some idiot makes the Bible more credible. Cameron is today's idiot. Anyone who claims to be Christian (Christian, meaning one who believes in and follows the teachings of Jesus of Nazerth, the CHRIST - CHRIST was not his last name it was what and who he was) is knowledgeable enough of the Bible to know and expect all manner of claims denying the Christ. As we pass further into the centuries, 21st, 22nd etc., the claims will grow wilder and louder and seem evermore irrefutable. Check the Book Revelations - we now live in the "end times.":clock:
Jeremiah is also a good reference -
Please make my day and provide evidence that supports your statements that are not from the Bible.
Originally posted by: sourceninja
Originally posted by: Siddhartha
Originally posted by: jimmyj68
Everyday some idiot makes the Bible more credible. Cameron is today's idiot. Anyone who claims to be Christian (Christian, meaning one who believes in and follows the teachings of Jesus of Nazerth, the CHRIST - CHRIST was not his last name it was what and who he was) is knowledgeable enough of the Bible to know and expect all manner of claims denying the Christ. As we pass further into the centuries, 21st, 22nd etc., the claims will grow wilder and louder and seem evermore irrefutable. Check the Book Revelations - we now live in the "end times.":clock:
Jeremiah is also a good reference -
Please make my day and provide evidence that supports your statements that are not from the Bible.
One of the major parts that makes the Christian religion work is that they must believe the world will end before their time is up. Revelations is written in such a way that the end is always coming. That is it's purpose, to drive people to live a 'good' life. I bet people in the middle ages had this same conversation (although I bet it ended with someone getting his head cut off). The fact is 200 years from now, the end is still 'near'.
wow, talk about an incorrect, baseless, and judgemental statement.Originally posted by: sixone
Funny how so many people who need proof to believe in God will never question this report. :roll:
Originally posted by: KLin
Originally posted by: HamburgerBoy
Originally posted by: JujuFish
What would AT be without its trolls?
A helluva lot better?
Yup.