SUPER HOT: Intel Pentium 4 3.2GHz Extreme Edition 2MB 800MHz FSB $1,025.00

[Monkeyshack]

WOW

Intel Pentium 4 3.2GHz Extreme Edition 2MB 800MHz FSB
for $1,025.00

link

 

[ThisIsMatt]

This isn't hot, and there are now two of these exact same threads.

Posting really expensive stuff as sarcastic hot deals got old 5 effing years ago.

 

[CherryBOMB]

Only 3 in stock.*!*
I'm buying all three

 

[Monkeyshack]

doh, sorry folks.
corinthos beat me to the punch I'm blind

 

[bargainshopper]

Originally posted by: CherryBOMB
Only 3 in stock.*!*
I'm buying all three

They have more then 3 but it is limit 3 per customer.

Seriously, do we put a $5 cooling fan to go with it?

 

[sk3tch]

Ugh..that 2MB of cache is L3. Pay all that coin and you don't even get to take advantage of that 2MB at L2...it is still 512KB L2, they just added L3...Athlon64/FX definitely looks better if I had to pick.

 

[NeoZGeo]

Ugh..that 2MB of cache is L3. Pay all that coin and you don't even get to take advantage of that 2MB at L2...it is still 512KB L2, they just added L3...Athlon64/FX definitely looks better if I had to pick.

Ugn... of course it's L3 cache. You can't have L2 2MB cache, it doesn't fit!

L3 is still at full clock speed, so there is no difference in performance any way. AMD 64 is nice, but I think Intel still beats them on most of the bench marks. Only if they lower the price..........

 

[crapito]

SUPER HOT

like your mom.

lame threads deserve lame jokes.

 

[Fallen Kell]

Originally posted by: NeoZGeo

Ugh..that 2MB of cache is L3. Pay all that coin and you don't even get to take advantage of that 2MB at L2...it is still 512KB L2, they just added L3...Athlon64/FX definitely looks better if I had to pick.

Ugn... of course it's L3 cache. You can't have L2 2MB cache, it doesn't fit!

L3 is still at full clock speed, so there is no difference in performance any way. AMD 64 is nice, but I think Intel still beats them on most of the bench marks. Only if they lower the price..........

NeoZGeo: I take it you didn't read the Titan Extreme Athlon64/FX PC review on the main site huh? It beat Intel in EVERY benchmark except one, and it is one in which they believe it is a motherboard chipset drivers issue (as other Athlon 64/FX systems have performed much better).

 

[InlineFive]

If this was an EE Engineering sample I might get it... Then we could expose the truth about Intel having x86-64 on their current processors!

 

[nycdude]

Originally posted by: Monkeyshack
WOW

Intel Pentium 4 3.2GHz Extreme Edition 2MB 800MHz FSB
for $1,025.00

link

Damn. Nice Find. :Q :Q LOL

 

[IgoByte]

This thread's da shiznit!

 

[RIGorous1]

Originally posted by: Fallen Kell

Originally posted by: NeoZGeo

Ugh..that 2MB of cache is L3. Pay all that coin and you don't even get to take advantage of that 2MB at L2...it is still 512KB L2, they just added L3...Athlon64/FX definitely looks better if I had to pick.

Ugn... of course it's L3 cache. You can't have L2 2MB cache, it doesn't fit!

L3 is still at full clock speed, so there is no difference in performance any way. AMD 64 is nice, but I think Intel still beats them on most of the bench marks. Only if they lower the price..........

NeoZGeo: I take it you didn't read the Titan Extreme Athlon64/FX PC review on the main site huh? It beat Intel in EVERY benchmark except one, and it is one in which they believe it is a motherboard chipset drivers issue (as other Athlon 64/FX systems have performed much better).

That's just one opinion... I read another opinion from Maximum PC that tested the G5, athlon64, and P4c EE, and of the 3 the Intel P4c EE got the gold crown over the athlon64. According to them the L3 cache makes a huge difference over the traditional p4c's.

 

[gunblade]

I would get a centrino laptop over this processor with the same money.

 

[Madcat207]

Originally posted by: NeoZGeo

Ugh..that 2MB of cache is L3. Pay all that coin and you don't even get to take advantage of that 2MB at L2...it is still 512KB L2, they just added L3...Athlon64/FX definitely looks better if I had to pick.

Ugn... of course it's L3 cache. You can't have L2 2MB cache, it doesn't fit!

L3 is still at full clock speed, so there is no difference in performance any way. AMD 64 is nice, but I think Intel still beats them on most of the bench marks. Only if they lower the price..........

Uh.... if it was full speed, then it would be L2, not L3. L3 by definition does NOT run at full speed.. it is simply an extra buffer that the CPU can use before hitting the RAM. But in no way is it full speed.

And yes, you could fit 2MB.. it owuld just take a larger dye..

 

[TrungRacingDev]

Originally posted by: RIGorous1

Originally posted by: Fallen Kell

Originally posted by: NeoZGeo

Ugh..that 2MB of cache is L3. Pay all that coin and you don't even get to take advantage of that 2MB at L2...it is still 512KB L2, they just added L3...Athlon64/FX definitely looks better if I had to pick.

Ugn... of course it's L3 cache. You can't have L2 2MB cache, it doesn't fit!

L3 is still at full clock speed, so there is no difference in performance any way. AMD 64 is nice, but I think Intel still beats them on most of the bench marks. Only if they lower the price..........

NeoZGeo: I take it you didn't read the Titan Extreme Athlon64/FX PC review on the main site huh? It beat Intel in EVERY benchmark except one, and it is one in which they believe it is a motherboard chipset drivers issue (as other Athlon 64/FX systems have performed much better).

That's just one opinion... I read another opinion from Maximum PC that tested the G5, athlon64, and P4c EE, and of the 3 the Intel P4c EE got the gold crown over the athlon64. According to them the L3 cache makes a huge difference over the traditional p4c's.

I also suscribe to maximum pc. They say nvidia fx 5950 is the fastest videocard, beating ati's 9800xt in the latest. We all know who's the graphic performance leader now dont we? Being a magazine read by many, I'm disappointed how they can still recommend nvidia. I'm inclined to believe nvidia pays them off somehow.

 

[Madcat207]

Originally posted by: TrungRacingDev

Originally posted by: RIGorous1

Originally posted by: Fallen Kell

Originally posted by: NeoZGeo

Ugh..that 2MB of cache is L3. Pay all that coin and you don't even get to take advantage of that 2MB at L2...it is still 512KB L2, they just added L3...Athlon64/FX definitely looks better if I had to pick.

Ugn... of course it's L3 cache. You can't have L2 2MB cache, it doesn't fit!

L3 is still at full clock speed, so there is no difference in performance any way. AMD 64 is nice, but I think Intel still beats them on most of the bench marks. Only if they lower the price..........

NeoZGeo: I take it you didn't read the Titan Extreme Athlon64/FX PC review on the main site huh? It beat Intel in EVERY benchmark except one, and it is one in which they believe it is a motherboard chipset drivers issue (as other Athlon 64/FX systems have performed much better).

That's just one opinion... I read another opinion from Maximum PC that tested the G5, athlon64, and P4c EE, and of the 3 the Intel P4c EE got the gold crown over the athlon64. According to them the L3 cache makes a huge difference over the traditional p4c's.

I also suscribe to maximum pc. They say nvidia fx 5950 is the fastest videocard, beating ati's 9800xt in the latest. We all know who's the graphic performance leader now dont we? Being a magazine read by many, I'm disappointed how they can still recommend nvidia. I'm inclined to believe nvidia pays them off somehow.

actually, had you rad that article, you would have seen that they said they cant crown the P4EE alone... the pic is wrong; it didnt win....

 

[Madcat207]

Originally posted by: TrungRacingDev

Originally posted by: RIGorous1

Originally posted by: Fallen Kell

Originally posted by: NeoZGeo

Ugh..that 2MB of cache is L3. Pay all that coin and you don't even get to take advantage of that 2MB at L2...it is still 512KB L2, they just added L3...Athlon64/FX definitely looks better if I had to pick.

Ugn... of course it's L3 cache. You can't have L2 2MB cache, it doesn't fit!

L3 is still at full clock speed, so there is no difference in performance any way. AMD 64 is nice, but I think Intel still beats them on most of the bench marks. Only if they lower the price..........

NeoZGeo: I take it you didn't read the Titan Extreme Athlon64/FX PC review on the main site huh? It beat Intel in EVERY benchmark except one, and it is one in which they believe it is a motherboard chipset drivers issue (as other Athlon 64/FX systems have performed much better).

That's just one opinion... I read another opinion from Maximum PC that tested the G5, athlon64, and P4c EE, and of the 3 the Intel P4c EE got the gold crown over the athlon64. According to them the L3 cache makes a huge difference over the traditional p4c's.

I also suscribe to maximum pc. They say nvidia fx 5950 is the fastest videocard, beating ati's 9800xt in the latest. We all know who's the graphic performance leader now dont we? Being a magazine read by many, I'm disappointed how they can still recommend nvidia. I'm inclined to believe nvidia pays them off somehow.

actually, had you rad that article, you would have seen that they said they cant crown the P4EE alone... the pic is wrong; it didnt win....

 

[NeoZGeo]

Uh.... if it was full speed, then it would be L2, not L3. L3 by definition does NOT run at full speed.. it is simply an extra buffer that the CPU can use before hitting the RAM. But in no way is it full speed.

Uh....... for your information, L2 should to be 1/2 of the speed, and L3 should be 1/3 of the speed. But Intel's L2 and L3 cache both are right on the dye, so it is at full clock speed, not 1/3 of the speed.

also, reivews doesn't do justice. It all come down to who pays more money in advertisment.

Before we turn this thread into "who makes the fastest processor in the market?", let's just drop it now. It's isn't that a great of a deal to begin with .

 

[SgtZulu]

wow people must really be desperate

this deal is ICE COLD

 

[tnguyen3in1]

The level of the cache does not determine the speed at which it runs. For the P4EE, all the caches are running at the same frequency. It is, as another poster pointed out, on the same die. It's the latency to the cache that determines the levels. The larger the cache, the longer it takes to access it.

 

[Venomous]

$1000 for a locked multiplier? I DONT think so...

 

[edplayer]

Originally posted by: Madcat207

Originally posted by: TrungRacingDev

Originally posted by: RIGorous1

Originally posted by: Fallen Kell

Originally posted by: NeoZGeo

Ugh..that 2MB of cache is L3. Pay all that coin and you don't even get to take advantage of that 2MB at L2...it is still 512KB L2, they just added L3...Athlon64/FX definitely looks better if I had to pick.

Ugn... of course it's L3 cache. You can't have L2 2MB cache, it doesn't fit!

L3 is still at full clock speed, so there is no difference in performance any way. AMD 64 is nice, but I think Intel still beats them on most of the bench marks. Only if they lower the price..........

NeoZGeo: I take it you didn't read the Titan Extreme Athlon64/FX PC review on the main site huh? It beat Intel in EVERY benchmark except one, and it is one in which they believe it is a motherboard chipset drivers issue (as other Athlon 64/FX systems have performed much better).

That's just one opinion... I read another opinion from Maximum PC that tested the G5, athlon64, and P4c EE, and of the 3 the Intel P4c EE got the gold crown over the athlon64. According to them the L3 cache makes a huge difference over the traditional p4c's.

I also suscribe to maximum pc. They say nvidia fx 5950 is the fastest videocard, beating ati's 9800xt in the latest. We all know who's the graphic performance leader now dont we? Being a magazine read by many, I'm disappointed how they can still recommend nvidia. I'm inclined to believe nvidia pays them off somehow.

actually, had you rad that article, you would have seen that they said they cant crown the P4EE alone... the pic is wrong; it didnt win....

OMG! I luv it when people quote quotes. Its makes a kewl design...

 

[Corsairpro]

booo