Super PI Scores - Post them!

[d3lt4]

I got 29.0xx sec 1M with my opty 144 @3.0ghz. That was my best time, but I don't have a link. And different memory now, so it's slower.

 

[Makaveli]

i'm doing 29sec with my 146 @ 2.8ghz.

after going thru the results I find it strange that i'm getting faster times then some that have 2.9 or 3ghz clocks.

Super PI is very sensitive to memory latency isn't it?

 

[evenmore1]

I'm getting 1m 12sec on my Athlon XP

I plan to upgrade soon...

 

[compgeek89]

12.922s...

Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 ES @ 4040MHz, 1.58v
Intel D975XBX Bad Axe 0908 BIOS, chipset 1.65v
2x 1GB G.Skill DDR2 800 @ 546MHz 5-5-5-15, 2.2v

http://img47.imageshack.us/img47/9483/sp1mtest4040560555157ir.jpg

(speed step drops multi to 6x, is @ 9x when app is running)

 

[d3lt4]

Originally posted by: Makaveli
i'm doing 29sec with my 146 @ 2.8ghz.

after going thru the results I find it strange that i'm getting faster times then some that have 2.9 or 3ghz clocks.

Super PI is very sensitive to memory latency isn't it?

Yes it is VERY sensitive to memory.

Originally posted by: compgeek89
12.922s...

Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 ES @ 4040MHz, 1.58v
Intel D975XBX Bad Axe 0908 BIOS, chipset 1.65v
2x 1GB G.Skill DDR2 800 @ 546MHz 5-5-5-15, 2.2v

http://img47.imageshack.us/img47/9483/sp1mtest4040560555157ir.jpg

(speed step drops multi to 6x, is @ 9x when app is running)

Wow that is nice. Can't wait for conroe.

 

[Hyperlite]

TM8200, 29s

 

[DJSfurry]

27 min 22 sec for 32M and 30 sec for 1M

 

[rock72]

SUPER PI---27 sec

 

[jlmadyson]

Originally posted by: Ronnie
Yes I'm running phase change, that superpi time was within 20 minutes of installing the cpu without tweaks.

http://img149.imageshack.us/my.php?image=256kr.jpg]

[/URL]

Sad to say but the chip is no longer with us.

:laugh:

No wonder, anyhow getting about 31@1M.

 

[thescreensavers]

My laptop got

1M 42sec
2M 1:39sec

 

[JRich]

1M ran 29s

 

[phaxmohdem]

477 Seconds (1 Mil)

K6-2 550.... I'm going to try and SuperPI my AMD K5 PR133 as well as my Pentium 90 CPU and see what happens. I'll keep ya'll posted on progress

 

[traxxton]

1M ran 31.969sec when assigned to CPU 2 -- FX60 @ 2.91GHZ
1M ran 30.484sec when assigned to CPU 2 -- FX60 @ 3.02GHZ

Does that seem right??

 

[DidlySquat]

^^^^ ROFL !!!!

30 seconds on my opty @330x9=2970 mhz

 

[Soulkeeper]

what version of super pi you all using tho ?
and what is the official super pi website ?

 

[Soulkeeper]

ok i used v1.4 on linux with wine
1.4 with sse2 mod:
1M 38s
2M 1m 24s
1.4 with sse3 mod:
1M 38s
2M 1m 24s

there are variances between the versions i'm sure i could get some faster numbers with older versions
this is with my prescott @3.2 cause of the 100+ temps we've been getting lately in my city

 

[theMan]

Originally posted by: mazeroth
Dang, I got 1m 02s for the 1M calculation. This PC sucks!

umm, are you serious? thats really screwed up. are you stable?

 

[996GT2]

34 Seconds 1M with Athlon 64 3500+ @ 2.75 GHz (1.344V). DDR2 running at slightly less than 667 mhz. Seems AM2 is a bit worse than 939 at SuperPi if your RAM is running at any speed under DDR2-800

http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j120/996gt2/3.jpg

I'll get back to you guys when I work up the courage to boot Windows on this thing at its max of 3.3+ GHz at 1.6V

 

[DidlySquat]

AM2 sux @super-cake and many other things. My S939 opty 165 @30 secs is better than ANY stock AMD proc until 2008.

 

[996GT2]

Well I just built my comp and didn't want to wait for Conroe, so I thought AM2 was the logical way to go since I can still re-use DDR2 if I ever go Conroe or anything...also AM2's performance in relation to 939 is dependent mostly on RAM speed. With DDR2-533, it's a bit slower, with 667, it's about even, and with 800+, it has a slight performance advantage over 939. I don't think of AM2 as a new socket for now, just something that will let me use DDR2 so that my upgrade paths for the future are better...

 

[DidlySquat]

Originally posted by: Hyperlite
TM8200, 29s

I shudder to think what kind of moron would post a score without saying the test parameters. Anywho your crappy laptop is slow for sure no point in benchmarking it.

My rig:

1M @ 30 Sec
2M @ 70 sec

 

[Texun]

Stock Newcastle 3800 1meg @ 39 seconds
Stock Sempron Palermo 3100 32 megs @ 44:07

 

[Powermoloch]

Sempron 3100+ "paris" @ 2.069 Ghz 1 meg : 44 seconds
Intel 630 @ stock (3.0 ghz) 1 meg : 44 seconds

lolwtfbbq !!!!

 

[n7]

Originally posted by: Powermoloch
Sempron 3100+ "paris" @ 2.069 Ghz 1 meg : 44 seconds
Intel 630 @ stock (3.0 ghz) 1 meg : 44 seconds

lolwtfbbq !!!!

Not surprising.

Paris is basically an A64 with less cache.


The best results i've been able to get outta my rig thus far:
SuperPI 1.5 31.516

 

[mithrandir2001]

2 min 29 sec for 1M SuperPi on a 1.4GHz Celeron Tualatin.

I am buying a new machine after the Core 2 Duo release and resulting CPU pricing shakeout.