So if the Bernie democratic socialists are looking for backing from the actual Democratic party, first thing they could do is stop treating them like the enemy.
Once they stop doing that, then they could actually ask for help.
Not even asking Clyburn for his endorsement guarantees you won't get it.
Even if Bernie toned down some of his rhetoric (he's more of a softie -- most of the pointing is to the "Bernie Bros"), it's not going to alter the fact that establishment Democrats will back their candidates. Not even Liz, so it's readily apparent.
His politics are different. SC is a state of conservative Democrats.
Telling Mike Bloomberg he's a bad guy who doesn't deserve his money, and he can take his billionaire funded campaign machine and shove it guarantees he will take it elsewhere (and maybe turn it on you.)
What does this have to do with my post?
The difference is that neither endorsements nor candidates dropping out impacts the value of an individual vote. Mayor Pete/Klob voters were perfectly capable of ignoring the endorsements and voting for Sanders if they wanted. In contrast, the EC has some votes count for more than others, simply by virtue of arbitrarily drawn state lines.
Neither does the order of the states going first. Aren't endorsements akin to that? People like Carville are praising Clyburn for single-handedly turning the race around and "saving" the Democratic party.
I genuinely hope they try to focus on that because no other candidate will have the luxury of such a comically mild thing for their opponents to focus on.
His kid got a cushy job? Who gives a fuck.
Seriously, think up a scandal for a candidate to have because Republicans will invent one if they don’t have one. Can you even imagine one better for the Democrat than ‘but but YOUR KID GOT A NICE JOB!’ I can’t.
When you poll, they see Bernie the Commie, Liz the Snake/Liar, and Biden the Corrupt. Remember Biden's response to the "fat" guy? You certain they won't play him like a harp?
Independent voters were far more likely than Democrats to view Hunter Biden’s business dealings as inappropriate.
www.politico.com
Definately not his only issue either.
One I can think of that is bad though is ‘you were a big fan of brutal communist dictatorships’. You might say that’s not true, and I agree, but it’s a way easier attack to use.
It was brought up in the SC debate, yet Bernie did slightly better than Biden (and everyone else) in the debate performance polls. There is scant evidence it's orders of magnitude worse than Biden corruption angle.
Exactly, all I would say is ‘your fashion designer daughter and her business failure idiot husband are running the White House’, point and then laugh.
We tried to do that in 2016 with Trump, yet people still got scared and discouraged over buttery emails. Republicans are even less inclined now to take attacks on Trump seriously because he's now an incumbent that had an OK economy and transformed the judicial system.
Taking money is not proof of corruption no matter how much you think it is. It's only corruption if taking the money is illegal
Corker kickback was corrupt. Bloomberg buying superdelegates by paying 2x-3X to curry favor is corrupt. Just because something isn't illegal doesn't mean it isn't corrupt.
Wait is Warren dropping out now a nefarious attempt by the DNC to rig the primary? Just asking because apparently that's what it was when Klobuchar and Buttigeig dropped out.
Warren going out likely helps Sanders as her base is probably between 50-50 and 60-40 Bernie. Endorsement likely would push the baseline higher as it likely did for Biden, especially in Klobuchar case in MN. Warren might not endorse because she doesn't want to go against the machinations of the party as usual.
Slight disagreement - I don't think it's solely a matter of their thinking that he'd be Trump's weakest plausible opponent. (They're perfectly happy to also prop up Tulsi despite her never having had an actual chance.) I think there's a fair amount of their considering dialing up the chaos, internal dissention and general distrust of political institutions here in the States. Win or lose, the worst aspects of Sanders campaign and his worst supporters are great for that.
I think they hope Bernie gets a plurality because of the shitstorm it would create.
Interviews with dozens of Democratic Party officials, including 93 superdelegates, found overwhelming opposition to handing Mr. Sanders the nomination if he fell short of a majority of delegates.
www.nytimes.com