It is posts like this, that attempt to rationalize why it is okay to be against same sex marriage, that are the most damaging.
It is OK to be against it, like its OK to find premarital sex morally wrong.
I don't see what the fuss is about. Why not let people be and accept what they want to?
Everyone isn't a right-wing hack trying to impose their views on the country.
It looks like it is reasonable, but it isn't.
It's reasonable.
Your morals not aligning with society isn't courageous. If I believed it to be moral to rape children, am I a coward for "conforming to society"? Comparing it to racial segregation is not a bully tactic. It is nearly identical, with identical arguments of why it shouldn't exist.
You're smarter than this...I know you are.
Don't drop down to obvious stupidity and hyperbole to make your point.
Makes it look as if you have no real, legit objection to my post...so you have to cite extreme examples.
Stop, please...you're smarter than this.
There are zero logical reasons a man cannot legally marry another man. There is no harm that will come to society. If someone can give me a single reason why same sex marriage should not be legal that doesn't involve tradition, religion, or cannot be applied to opposite sex marriage, I will support not allowing it.
I agree, objecting to SSM isn't banning it. Personally, I outright object it, but I am OK with gays marrying if/when it becomes legal because I am not forced to officiate a gay wedding, nor marry someone of the same sex myself.