I thought we weren’t supposed to judge people based on how they choose to live their lives
I thought we weren’t supposed to judge people based on how they choose to live their livesEven as a member of that wacko cult, where she has plead to only ever take life directions from her appointed "male master"? Something doesn't smell right...
Please don't be that guy.And even more trickery. So they pay off a supreme court justice and through his son to retire so they can pick another more conservative justice. Am I reading this right?
http://theweek.com/speedreads/782149/anthony-kennedys-son-trumps-moneylender-deutsche-bank
Please don't be that guy.
The Sad Delusion of Anthony Kennedy Conspiracy Theories
https://slate.com/news-and-politics...nspiracy-theories-are-a-liberal-delusion.html
I thought we weren’t supposed to judge people based on how they choose to live their lives
A truly rare moment! I'll drink a glass of wine in your honor tonight.For once, you and I agree. I’ve seen nothing to make me believe that’s anything other than a silly conspiracy theory.
Oh, well if some of the most conservative Democrats approve then she must be okay. I think people place too much importance on sanity as a qualification anyway.Well Hillary’s uninspired running mate that no one remembers and bunch of other moderates confirmed her in the Senate for the 7th circuit:
She received 55 voted in the Senate, including from Democrats Joe Manchin (West Virginia), Joe Donnelly (Indiana) and Tim Kaine (Virginia) as well as several moderate Republicans like Shelley Moore Capito (West Virginia), Susan Collins (Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska).
I do appreciate your concern.
I thought we weren’t supposed to judge people based on how they choose to live their lives
Possibly, did the Senate not know these things when they confirmed her to the 7th circuit?Yeah, but she swore an oath that she only serve fealty to her appointed male master, be it in decisions of life and work. Her master determines her actions above all other influences.
...kinda important thing to consider for a possible SCOTUS justice, no?
Possibly, did the Senate not know these things when they confirmed her to the 7th circuit?
Aren't you someone who thinks that politicians are terrible at their jobs?Possibly, did the Senate not know these things when they confirmed her to the 7th circuit?
You might as well be honest about it...ANYBODY appointed by conservatives is going to be disqualified in some way in your opinion.Maybe they had reasons to ignore her jurisprudence for a lower court. SCOTUS is a big deal, Kennedy's seat in particular.
Her background of... servitude to "men" disqualifies her IMO.
Servitude not found. This particular relgious group seems to be what would emerge if you put Christianity and the communal socialist counter culture of the 60s into a blender. Some media outlets are characterizing it as a cult because the character assasination game has begun.Maybe they had reasons to ignore her jurisprudence for a lower court. SCOTUS is a big deal, Kennedy's seat in particular.
Her background of... servitude to "men" disqualifies her IMO.
For the ones who are terrible, yesAren't you someone who thinks that politicians are terrible at their jobs?
Servitude not found. This particular relgious group seems to be what would emerge if you put Christianity and the communal socialist counter culture of the 60s into a blender. Some media outlets are characterizing it as a cult because the character assasination game has begun.
Two of her seven children are Haitian adoptions. She sounds like a progressive Christian, which would be a welcome voice to SCOTUS.
You might as well be honest about it...ANYBODY appointed by conservatives is going to be disqualified in some way in your opinion.
You keep mentioning this. What is the McConnell and McCain rule?They are just applying the McConnell and McCain rule, after all.
You keep mentioning this. What is the McConnell and McCain rule?
The only reason she is under consideration is because her profile provided the oxygen consuming news cycle coverage that Trump thrives in.Gawd. She wouldn't even be under consideration if she were a progressive Christian.
1) When it looked like Clinton would win McCain said that the Senate shouldn't confirm any justice Hillary Clinton were to nominate.
2) McConnell blockaded a SCOTUS justice because of an upcoming election. (and don't even try the presidential year vs. midterm BS.)
Considering the 'Biden Rule' came from something Joe Biden happened to talk about one day and then never do, it would appear that serves as ample precedent for applying the McCain and McConnell rules to oppose and block all nominees going forward. Correct? If not correct, why was the 'Biden rule' special?
.................and will continue to do it over the next 6 years.trump has rammed a lot of activist judges onto the courts.
.................and will continue to do it over the next 6 years.
Even as a member of that wacko cult, where she has plead to only ever take life directions from her appointed "male master"? Something doesn't smell right...