I'm mot that huge of a fan of windows crashing into the background or burning up or whatever, i frankly couldn't care less about the visual effects.
On a scale performance is ten and looks is 0 for me, yet i do find the improvements in KDE to be quite the thing i have been looking for in a GUI.
If you like OpenSuSE, try the latest update from factory, it's as stable as 10.2 and much much better, it's pretty much everything that OpenSuSE should have been.
Of course, it you insist on using beryl or compiz, and the various ways of including them that will work too, but be warned, starting a gtk app while running beryl and KDE will give you ulcers when the kernel acpi modes turns your performance down, beryl will not report the syscall to KDE and KDE will not report the syscall to the system.
So use kwin if you want to know what it is like to run a desktop like a desktop should be.
I hear Ubuntu is copying half of this, that would make Ubuntu going from Debian to SuSE half of the trip, i'm not really liking that, but i guess that Canonical has plans for Impi, their money making distro.
On a scale performance is ten and looks is 0 for me, yet i do find the improvements in KDE to be quite the thing i have been looking for in a GUI.
If you like OpenSuSE, try the latest update from factory, it's as stable as 10.2 and much much better, it's pretty much everything that OpenSuSE should have been.
Of course, it you insist on using beryl or compiz, and the various ways of including them that will work too, but be warned, starting a gtk app while running beryl and KDE will give you ulcers when the kernel acpi modes turns your performance down, beryl will not report the syscall to KDE and KDE will not report the syscall to the system.
So use kwin if you want to know what it is like to run a desktop like a desktop should be.
I hear Ubuntu is copying half of this, that would make Ubuntu going from Debian to SuSE half of the trip, i'm not really liking that, but i guess that Canonical has plans for Impi, their money making distro.