- Oct 16, 2019
- 2,703
- 6,405
- 146
This is not a good picture Charlie's painting of whatever's left of Intel's roadmap.
For the record, this is also significantly worse than any expectations I ever had as well. Far, far worse.
Hell, if anything Charlie is a tad optimistic on Intel's outlook. The long fall has just begun.
Oh my God, I've just seen my post... never try to multi-quote on your phone, sorry for that mess@lobz They can't avoid making the GPU larger, because people do care about the graphics part. In the ultrabook form factor, there's no other option, and if you are going to buy an expensive laptop, of course some will opt for the best option, and that includes the iGPU. Manufacturers charged $200-300 extra for the Iris option, and some people went for it. You have to have a well-rounded product, otherwise some people will go elsewhere.
And I assure you if they stop on the iGPU development altogether, even Nvidia will find a way to increase use of their dGPU even for ultrabooks and convertibles.
As for the size reduction, I assume CPU core has shrunk 2x and GPU close to 2.7x. Their GPU was was large for its performance level, so it was a much needed focus. They still need at least 1 more generation of efficiency gains.
Their desktop/server is quite messy, but eventually they'll go in that road.
I'd say, on the CPU side, we're having a preeeeeetty darned good time as consumers right nowWe actually need Intel to hit back to keep AMD on their toes, otherwise innovation might stagnate like it did with Intel. A decade with AMD in the lead and Intel floundering like a fish out of water would be just as bad as when the tables were reversed. The best time to be a consumer was back when AMD and Intel used to trade blows often (The so-called GigaHertz Wars, Late 90's to mid 00's) which is the type of competition I'd like to see again.
I'm happy to see AMD in the lead for now. They were behind for a very long time.
As for the size reduction, I assume CPU core has shrunk 2x and GPU close to 2.7x. Their GPU was was large for its performance level, so it was a much needed focus. They still need at least 1 more generation of efficiency gains.
2.7 is supposed to be achieved from 14nm to 10nm. I don't think they will ever set such a goal again, be it 7nm or 5nm in the foreseeable future, as it has proven to be a near-fatal decision looking back.We have no visibility into Intel’s 7nm manufacturing process, other than the fact that they just started buying production tools in August. Shrinks and electrostatic performance info is a big fat zero. I'm surprised you think the iGPU will shrink more than the cpu, both have allot of logic (though, perhaps there is less redundancy on the GPU to improve yield).
Yes but we need intel to hit back on actual products, not on time-stretching annoucements and certainly not on their dreadful """""""marketing""""""".We actually need Intel to hit back to keep AMD on their toes, otherwise innovation might stagnate like it did with Intel. A decade with AMD in the lead and Intel floundering like a fish out of water would be just as bad as when the tables were reversed. The best time to be a consumer was back when AMD and Intel used to trade blows often (The so-called GigaHertz Wars, Late 90's to mid 00's) which is the type of competition I'd like to see again.
I'm happy to see AMD in the lead for now. They were behind for a very long time.
Well, so far AMD haven't really made any money.We actually need Intel to hit back to keep AMD on their toes, otherwise innovation might stagnate like it did with Intel. A decade with AMD in the lead and Intel floundering like a fish out of water would be just as bad as when the tables were reversed. The best time to be a consumer was back when AMD and Intel used to trade blows often (The so-called GigaHertz Wars, Late 90's to mid 00's) which is the type of competition I'd like to see again.
I'm happy to see AMD in the lead for now. They were behind for a very long time.
I'm surprised you think the iGPU will shrink more than the cpu, both have allot of logic (though, perhaps there is less redundancy on the GPU to improve yield).
I'd say, on the CPU side, we're having a preeeeeetty darned good time as consumers right now