People keep saying Battlefront is like Battlefield. It is not. It hardly resembles Battlefield. It uses the same graphics tech, yeah, but the gameplay is much different. For everyone that keeps parroting over and over that SW:BF is Battlefield, read this post, then provide evidence that Battlefield is more like Battlefield than CoD.
No classes, no gun mods, card-based special abilities, power-up based vehicles, squads have been removed and downgraded to a single partner, no 64-man matches, no Conquest mode... Does that sound like Battlefield? No. Because it isn't like Battlefield. Battlefront is a lot more like COD than it is Battlefield. Yet another wrong expectation everyone walks in with. Every major gameplay feature lines up with CoD, not with Battlefield.
It's Star Wars CoD with vastly better graphics and sound design. If you don't like Call of Duty or Star Wars you won't like Battlefront.
If you think SW:BF is going to be like Battlefront 1 or 2, you will not like SW:BF. If you think SW:BF is going to be like Battlefield, you will not like SW:BF. If you don't like Call of Duty style games, you will not like SW:BF.
IMO they locked way too much content behind unlocks, with not enough maps, heros, or guns. They did do a good job on the number of different modes though. The unlockable content makes the game feel like it has even less content than the already sparse content it has. The core gameplay is finely tuned and smooth but it just needs more stuff that isn't overpowered stationary turrets. If you didn't get it already, wait until the DLCs have come out and buy the super pack for cheaper. This game will benefit from the DLCs provided they dont crap the bed on level design.