Sweet & Lovable . . .

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

BaliBabyDoc

Lifer
Jan 20, 2001
10,737
0
0
Peggy Noonan qualifies as a lady. She's a shrill hack for the GOP (particularly Reagan) but she's still a lady.

Phyllis Schafly is a lady . . . a touch uptight but still a lady.

Laura Bush is a lady and a good First Lady.

Kay Bailey Hutchinson is a lady and a decent senator.

Ann Coulter is a skank with typing skills. The only reason pretty girls would be her allies is to keep her as a pet.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: jumpr
Her column doesn't even make sense. Seriously, it's like she's putting her stream of consciousness down on paper.

Indeed. She sounds like she patronizes the same doctor as Rush Limbaugh and Courtney Love.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: CADMaster
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk

"Here at the Spawn of Satan convention in Boston, conservatives are deploying a series
of covert signals to identify one another, much like gay men do. My allies are the ones
wearing crosses or American flags.
The people sporting shirts emblazoned with the 'F-word' are my opponents. Also, as always,
the pretty girls and cops are on my side, most of them barely able to conceal their eye-rolling.

"Democrats are constantly suing and slandering police as violent, fascist racists --
with the exception of Boston's police, who'll be lauded as national heroes right up until
the Democrats pack up and leave town on Friday, whereupon they'll revert to their natural
state of being fascist, racist pigs. . . .

"My pretty-girl allies stick out like a sore thumb amongst the corn-fed, no make-up,
natural fiber, no-bra needing, sandal-wearing, hirsute, somewhat fragrant hippie chick
pie wagons they call 'women' at the Democratic National Convention."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

OMG! That was hilarious !!!!!!!!!!!!!!


:thumbsup: I think Ann got nailed in the head.
 

jackschmittusa

Diamond Member
Apr 16, 2003
5,972
1
0
Good link Orsorum.

The truely sad thing though is that she is not some lone voice in the wilderness. Not only are there others like her, but that there are multitudes who eagerly await such outpourings of vileness and consume it as if it were ambrosia.
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
My question: What did USA Today expect to happen? You hire a venomous red-faced spittle spewer and that's exactly what you get. Ann is so full of hate, it verges on comedy. In fact, whenever I read her op/ed pieces, I can't help laughing hysterically. She's so extremely partisan it's impossible to take her seriously.

That said, it's too bad they cut her loose. I'm sure USA Today would have gotten some sort of readership boost out of it.
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: arsbanned
But what about Ann Coulter, alchemize. You know, the topic?

What of her? I was just pointing out the hypocrisy of both sides
Do you or do you not agree with her "article"?

*sigh*

No I don't agree with it, and no I don't see any difference from what she does and what the hard core lefties, and a growing portion of the democrat party are doing (like Carter sitting next to MM, for example).
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
I do think she'd fit right in on this board.

Although she'd be the only one ever accusing politicians, families or entire companies of things like "being a criminal" and "abusing drugs and/or alcohol", or making sweeping generalizations about the opposite party
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: alchemize
I do think she'd fit right in on this board.

Although she'd be the only one ever accusing politicians, families or entire companies of things like "being a criminal" and "abusing drugs and/or alcohol", or making sweeping generalizations about the opposite party

Yeah, but we've already got HS. He basically channels Coulter...
 

Orsorum

Lifer
Dec 26, 2001
27,631
5
81
Originally posted by: alchemize
I do think she'd fit right in on this board.

Although she'd be the only one ever accusing politicians, families or entire companies of things like "being a criminal" and "abusing drugs and/or alcohol", or making sweeping generalizations about the opposite party

Bush's DWI record is not an allegation, it's fact.
 

maddogchen

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2004
8,903
2
76
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: alchemize
I do think she'd fit right in on this board.

Although she'd be the only one ever accusing politicians, families or entire companies of things like "being a criminal" and "abusing drugs and/or alcohol", or making sweeping generalizations about the opposite party

Yeah, but we've already got HS. He basically channels Coulter...

I'd welcome her, i'd hit on her all day long then.

And quite a few of us probably would get banned with the "PERSONAL FLAMES WILL NOT BE TOLERATED." thing. Would it break the rules if we made a thread all about her when she's a member?
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,757
2,533
126
I saw that article in this morning's paper but I thought it was a poorly done parody.
 

CaptnKirk

Lifer
Jul 25, 2002
10,053
0
71
Salon's Eric Boehlert makes the connection:

"So far there have been two major media black eyes at the Democratic convention in Boston.
The first was on Monday when the Washington Post handed out 10,000 copies of a special
convention issue of the daily, complete with the dated banner headline 'Election 2000.'

"The second talked-about misfire was USA Today's decision to spike as unusable a column it
had commissioned from radical right-wing pundit Ann Coulter. The decision to not run the lazy,
mean-spirited rant actually made perfect sense, especially after Coulter reportedly refused to m
ake any requested changes. But then Coulter ran to Fox News and insisted that the paper was
trying to 'ban' her conservative voice, which meant USA Today had a headache on its hands.

"The Post blamed its snafu on a production error; the news desk had used a template from the last
time a special convention issue was published and forgot to double-check the date.
And what was USA Today's excuse? Why on earth did the paper, known for its moderate bent and
almost old-school approach to journalism (anonymous quotes are still a no-no there),
ever think it was a good idea to open up its Op-Ed pages to a fringe columnist like Coulter?
She's someone who's on the record -- after 9/11 -- as saying, 'My only regret with Timothy McVeigh
is he did not go to the New York Times Building,' and whom even the conservative National Review,
which used to publish Coulter, has tagged as nonsensical."
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
So you guys don't like name calling and generalizations all of a sudden?
I think they do that's why they are criticising Mann Coulter
 

Willian

Banned
Mar 24, 2004
106
0
0
Originally posted by: Czar
wow, that she actualy has a job writing her opinions is amazing,
would love to see how long she would last on this forum

The liberals on this board wouldnt stand a chance in a debate with Coulter or Savage, Way to much idiocy oh I mean liberalism on these forums.......
 

Willian

Banned
Mar 24, 2004
106
0
0
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
Do you or do you not agree with her "article"?
I think she toned it down for the U.S.A Today crowd, and could have made her point more directly , if she wasn't so afraid of liberal censorship and persecution...which she was subjected to anyway!@
Get a clue.

You should take your own advice.
 

daveymark

Lifer
Sep 15, 2003
10,573
1
0
Here's rest of the article:

Apparently, the nuts at the Democratic National Convention are going to be put in cages outside the convention hall. Sadly, they won't be fighting to the death as is done in W.W.F. caged matches. They're calling this the "protestor's area," although I suppose a better name would be the "truth-free zone".

I thought this was a great idea until I realized the nut category did not include Sharpton, Al Gore, Bill Clinton, and Teddy Kennedy -- all featured speakers at the convention. I'd say the actual policy is only untelegenic nuts get the cages, but little Dennis Kucinich is speaking at the Convention, too. So it must be cages for nuts who have not run for president as serious candidates for the Democratic Party.

Looking at the line-up of speakers at the Convention, I have developed the 7-11 challenge: I will quit making fun of, for example, Dennis Kucinich, if he can prove he can run a 7-11 properly for 8 hours. We'll even let him have an hour or so of preparation before we open up. Within 8 hours, the money will be gone, the store will be empty, and he'll be explaining how three 11-year olds came in and asked for the money and he gave it to them.

For 20 years, the Democrats wouldn't let Jimmy Carter within 100 miles of a Convention podium. The fact that Carter is now their most respectable speaker tells you where that party is today. Maybe they just want to remind Americans who got us into this Middle East mess in the first place. W've got millions of fanatical Muslims trying to slaughter Americans while shouting Allah Akbar! Yeah, let's turn the nation over to these guys.

With any luck, Gore will uncork his speech comparing Republicans to Nazis. Just a few weeks ago, Gore gave a speech accusing the Bush administration of deploying digital "Brown Shirts" to intimidate journalists and pressure the media into writing good things about Bush -- in case you were wondering where all those glowing articles about Bush were coming from.

The last former government official to slake his thirst so deeply with the kool-aid and become a far-left peacenik was Ramsey Clarke and it took him a few years to really blossom. Clinton must have done some number on Gore. Then again, with his yen for earth tones in a man's wardrobe, maybe Gore's references to "Brown Shirts" was intended as a compliment.

Only one major newspaper -- the Boston Herald -- reported Gore's Brown Shirt comment, though a Bush campaign spokesman's statement quoting the "Brown Shirt" line made it into the very last sentence of a Los Angeles Times article. The New York Times responded with an article criticizing both Republicans and Democrats for using Nazi imagery. Democrats call Republicans Nazis, the Republicans quote the Democrats calling Republicans Nazis and both are using Nazi imagery. (It's a cycle of violence!)

The nuts in the cages are virtual Bertrand Russells compared to the official speakers at the Democratic Convention. On the basis of their placards, I gather the caged-nut position is that they love the troops so much, they don't want them to get hurt defending America from terrorist attack. Support the troops, the signs say, bring them home.

That's my new position on all government workers, except the 5% who aren't useless, which is to say cops, prosecutors, firemen and U.S. servicemen. I love bureaucrats at the National Endowment of the Arts funding crucifixes submerged in urine so much -- I think they should go home. I love public school teachers punishing any mention of God and banning Christmas songs so much -- I think they should go home.

Walking back from the convention site I chatted with a normal Bostonian for several blocks -- who must have identified me through our covert system of signals. He was mostly bemused by the Democrats' primetime speakers and told me he used to be an independent, but for the last 20 years found himself voting mostly Republican. Then he corrected himself and said he votes for the American.

I'd say I love all these Democrats in Boston so much I want them to go home, but I don't. I want Americans to get a good long look at the French Party and keep the 7-11 challenge in mind.
 
Jul 23, 2004
42
0
0
I think if Savage ever got into an actual debate with anyone over the age of 15, he would get hammered. I don't mean ranting and raving, i mean an actual debate, where you have to prove your allegations, and so forth, he would seriously get a butt whooping. Ditto with Coulter, they work well in op-ed because you don't usually have to prove your allegations. Once the burden of proof was laid down, it's basically just wiping everything out they have.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |