The problem is that we have absolutely no control on the placement or spacing of memory slots on motherboards.
As with our other memory products, removing the spreaders will void the warranty and has a HIGH likelihood of damaging the modules.
While I appreciate your participation and support across so many forums but I have to say this rationalization is very weak. There's no question that both the development team and the final decision maker on this product have made a massive mistake with this heat spreader design.
The product is marketed directly to overclockers who will always have after market cooling, yet the Vengeance heat spreader is WAY too tall and not even compatible with Corsair's own A70. On an Asus P8P67, the first DIMM slot is completely blocked and the second is aligned directly under the edge of the fan. The second slot can be used but the heat spreader is in direct contact with the fan by about a half an inch (the module is actually forced to lean over a bit by the fan). Claiming that the problem is that Corsair doesn't have control over the placement of the memory slots is like designing the A70 tower to be 15" tall and then saying it doesn't fit because you don't have control over the size of computer cases from other manufacturers. Memory slots are always in the same general area of the board and conflicts between memory modules and CPU cooling towers is always a consideration for the moderately informed consumer. This is such a fundamental issue!
I think it's absolutely outrageous that Corsair went through the entire product development process without recognizing and correcting such a basic factor like the height of the spreaders. The sales impact from this issue is going to be massive if not catastrophic. Basically, anybody who researches before buying is going to choose different RAM (or not buy an A70) and people who find out after buying are going to have a very negative experience with the product and with Corsair depending on how the resolution is handled.
You said there wan't room for an alternative design due to the Vengeance price point but what about all the negative financial impacts of releasing a flawed product like this? Lost Vengeance sales, cost of handling complaints, lost A70 sales, brand reputation/loyalty, etc. I would guess that a few extra pennies in the per unit manufacturing cost is nothing when compared to the financial impacts when everything is considered.
Like I've said elsewhere, I do like Corsair as a brand but I'm extremely disappointed with this Vengeance issue. I got the A70 and Vengeance RAM specifically because I assumed Corsair would ensure compatibility between their own products but unfortunately that is not the case. I'm just happy the ICs survived the modification (removal of the spreader) that was necessary to use these Vengeance modules with an A70 cooler on an Asus P8P67 Pro board. Not only do I loose the cooling but it looks lame and feels jury rigged which really bugs me. I really didn't want the module to be pressed tightly against the fan like it would have to be to keep the heat spreader on.
Thanks again for all the guidance you offer in all the forums but please make sure some of this feedback gets to the right people internally there at Corsair. Hopefully the lessons learned will be of benefit to ongoing product development and that's good for me as a Corsair fan.