m: I think you need to start thinking your stuck on something.
There is nothing immature for charging fat people more for insurance. Its all about risk/reward.
M: Charging fat people more is already built into the system and to the extent that fat people who lose insurance can't get it back again. A strictly risk reward insurance system means no insurance company will insure risk at any level many low income people will be able to afford, while at the same time, they can't be turned away from emergency care at hospitals at public expense. So you get cheaper health care but pay it back in taxes and an elevated level.
m: Futhermore, what sin is committed by soda?
M: Soda doesn't commit sin. Those who ruin their health by drinking it do. The body is God's temple. Purity of body is a conservative moral imperative.
m: The only external costs are those forced upon to others by government. If you eliminate those, then there is no sin. If you drink too much soda, you might get fat. That has and should not have an impact on anyone else.
M: Using too much sugar is just like drinking too much alcohol so alcohol is taxed. Too much is the quantity that makes you fat. Want to drink in moderation and commit no sin, you still have to pay the tax for the privilege of doing what teetotalers don't. The greater the self control the less the risk and the greater the reward.
m: Risk must get priced into insurance. Otherwise there will be too much consumption by the slackers of society.
M: By the time too much consumption has taken place it's already become a preexisting insurable condition, the cost of which is passed on to the non-slackers in the form of taxes all of them must pay, not just those who take advantage and risk whether they can successfully manage their desires to indulge in sin. In this way the cost of dangerous substances is increased and the most on slackers, as you call them, while the cost of insurance and the elimination of health care waste via emergency room expense, is reduced by the wider availability of affordable health care.
And don't forget that the legislature elected by the people says what sin is as long as the courts don't disagree. Sin tax is a reality you will have to live with regardless of your opinion as to what sin really is. Sin tax is a cost shifting mechanism that both deters via its expense and transfers the burden imposed by sinners back to them. It rewards non-indulgers directly because they don't pay sin tax while reducing their other tax burden by decreasing wasteful medical practices that occur when people don't have medical insurance by providing extra revenue with which society can subsidize the cost of health insurance and create increase availability to those who can't afford it otherwise.
These are really just liberal solutions to the problems conservatives have created in society by inflating their own egos, running down and disparaging the week and nonconforming, by telling them they are worthless slackers from the time they are children. Self destructive life styles are just these folks way of getting even by destroying themselves and taking others with them. We have taught them they are worthless enough to want to do this by our selfishness and indifference to their pain because we are in just such pain ourselves and will not see it. Disdain for the weak is just another form of self destruction. But you will never see or understand because you do not want to and the complexity of thought and the introspective clarity to do so is prevented by your defective inability to reason. Have a great day.