[TECH Report] As the second turns: the web digests our game testing methods

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Zanovar

Diamond Member
Jan 21, 2011
3,446
232
106

Ferzerp

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 1999
6,438
107
106
Everyone unable to find that information in less time it took to either post complaining it wasn't cited, or failing to cite it.
 

Keysplayr

Elite Member
Jan 16, 2003
21,209
50
91
I have a funny feeling you are playing air guitar

keys(badly too,just my mental image ),some of these review sites need to start playing around etc.some are.THANK FOOK!.
Don't need air guitar when i play piano. ;D
@ ferzerp: Thanks, I was looking for the exact H page with that topic.
 

willomz

Senior member
Sep 12, 2012
334
0
0
Of course this was several driver revisions ago. Mind you we wouldn't want to rerun the tests with newer drivers or Imouto will get upset
 

Zanovar

Diamond Member
Jan 21, 2011
3,446
232
106
Don't need air guitar when i play piano. ;D
@ ferzerp: Thanks, I was looking for the exact H page with that topic.

Can i experience som e of your stuff?

dont be shy keys.if its shit i shal say so
 
Last edited:

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
If TechReport did such a sloppy job why are they being taken seriously by respected figures from all over the place, including AMD themselves.

Fermi are terrible at running current games at top quality levels, is anyone surprised? So are legacy AMD cards. This is why serious gamers regularly upgrade their graphics cards.

Don't assume that everyone who is interested in frame latencies is some rabid Nvidia fanboy. This should interest anyone who is keen on graphics technology. In fact it should interest people with AMD hardware more as they will get the benefit from the improved drivers.

Try reading the source material. Last gen AMD, in TR's tests, were way superior to last gen nVidia. If we were to apply the same outcome to those as many are to the current gen then Cayman was smoother than Fermi just as people are determining from these tests between Kepler and Tahiti. Thing is, nobody saw that. I haven't seen any Fermi owners (1st or 2nd gen) in all the time they've been around, come on and complain about their overall smoothness, or lack there of.

I'm not going to go through the kind of effort it takes to copy and paste graphs from the subject reviews just to counter the arguments from people who either haven't read the reviews or are choosing to ignore/conceal the data. If you've read it then quit misrepresenting the situation. If you haven't, then please do so you'll know what I'm referring to.
 

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
The graphs already quantify it.

As you know they tested multiple games and more than one area within Skyrim and found stuttering in many of those games.

Don't try to make out that stuttering only occurs in one portion of one game.
If that was true why would AMD go to all the hassle of making a patch?

AMD would be stupid to not be concerned about benches that show their product in a negative light. Don't infer more than that from it.

EDIT: I'll add this from [H]'s recent review of the 7870 TahitiLE. Latest drivers after the TR review had been published.
If it was the intent for this card to be a "GTX 660 Ti Killer" then it has been successful at carrying that out. If you are in the market for a card capable of delivering a great game play experience at 1920x1080 resolutions, then look no further than the PowerColor HD 7870 MYST as it provides near Radeon HD 7950 level performance for Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition pricing.
This is from a review where they actually play all of the games and draw their conclusions from the actual game play experience. Note that in their opinion the 7870LE is a "GTX 660 TI Killer". According to TR though the GTX 660 TI is better than the 7970. How can that be? LINK
 
Last edited:

Jaydip

Diamond Member
Mar 29, 2010
3,691
21
81
I think people's perception is changing.They are not satisfied with raw fps they want more But I think TR indeed did a commendable job as it seems even AMD took them seriously.In the end smoother gaming experience for everyone win-win.
 

willomz

Senior member
Sep 12, 2012
334
0
0
Yeah most people don't complain, because they aren't in the privileged situation of having a number of cards to compare. People see a bit of stuttering on their 560, they tend to think oh I should have bought a 570 or gone SLI.
 

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
I think people's perception is changing.They are not satisfied with raw fps they want more But I think TR indeed did a commendable job as it seems even AMD took them seriously.In the end smoother gaming experience for everyone win-win.

Yeah most people don't complain, because they aren't in the privileged situation of having a number of cards to compare. People see a bit of stuttering on their 560, they tend to think oh I should have bought a 570 or gone SLI.

I see. So, even though nobody ever saw it, the problem was always there, but we didn't know it. So, when is nVidia gonna get off of their butts and fix all those Fermi cards they sold, and are still selling?
 

willomz

Senior member
Sep 12, 2012
334
0
0
AMD would be stupid to not be concerned about benches that show their product in a negative light. Don't infer more than that from it.

The guy I was replying to was trying to infer that techreport cherry picked specific rare sequences that showed AMD in a bad light. All I was trying to say was that this wasn't true.

I take it you are suggesting that AMD admit there is a stuttering issue, but that this is purely a technical thing and not something that impacts gameplay experience?
 

willomz

Senior member
Sep 12, 2012
334
0
0
I see. So, even though nobody ever saw it, the problem was always there, but we didn't know it. So, when is nVidia gonna get off of their butts and fix all those Fermi cards they sold, and are still selling?

I'm suggesting that people did see it, but treated it as normal. They figured it was just because those games were cutting edge and there wasn't any point complaining.

Thing is that techreport DID flag it up at the time, they didn't try to brush it under the carpet or anything like they are supposed to be in Nvidias pocket or something.

The reason it is surprising with the 7950 vs 660Ti is because the 7950 has such a large lead in theory, the theoretical throughput ought to make it blow the 660 Ti out of the water.
 

Jaydip

Diamond Member
Mar 29, 2010
3,691
21
81

willomz

Senior member
Sep 12, 2012
334
0
0
EDIT: I'll add this from [H]'s recent review of the 7870 TahitiLE. Latest drivers after the TR review had been published.

This is from a review where they actually play all of the games and draw their conclusions from the actual game play experience. Note that in their opinion the 7870LE is a "GTX 660 TI Killer". According to TR though the GTX 660 TI is better than the 7970. How can that be? LINK

Yeah it's a good card, and that's why I recommended it to someone on this very forum only today. It helps that it's actually cheaper than any 660 Ti atm.

You will note that HardOCP tested on completely different games and an even smaller selection than techreport.
 

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
The guy I was replying to was trying to infer that techreport cherry picked specific rare sequences that showed AMD in a bad light. All I was trying to say was that this wasn't true.

I take it you are suggesting that AMD admit there is a stuttering issue, but that this is purely a technical thing and not something that impacts gameplay experience?

I'm not saying anything except that people shouldn't take something and simply apply whatever meaning to it that makes them happy.

Please read game play reviews. There is no mention of single GPU stuttering in any of them (We aren't talking about crossfire here. That's a different situation.). Nobody is pointing out that the games are smoother on Kepler than Southern Islands. Typically they are still coming to the same conclusion, AMD offers better performance at a lower price than nVidia.
 

willomz

Senior member
Sep 12, 2012
334
0
0
It doesn't make me any happier whichever card is faster, why would it?

Yeah I agree at the top end the 670 and especially 680 are overpriced compared to AMD, that doesn't mean stuttering doesn't exist.
 

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
Yeah it's a good card, and that's why I recommended it to someone on this very forum only today. It helps that it's actually cheaper than any 660 Ti atm.

You will note that HardOCP tested on completely different games and an even smaller selection than techreport.

You miss or ignore the entire point and go off on a tangent. Look at any review you want to. Nobody has been complaining about AMD being less smooth than nVidia. Until TR came up with this frame latency agenda, they weren't even saying it. It wasn't ever visible in any reviews.
 

willomz

Senior member
Sep 12, 2012
334
0
0
And this is exactly why everyone is so interested now.

Previously reviews were just mindless representations of FPS numbers. Most reviewers don't actually do any real gameplay, they just batch a whole load of benchmarks.
 

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
And this is exactly why everyone is so interested now.

Previously reviews were just mindless representations of FPS numbers. Most reviewers don't actually do any real gameplay, they just batch a whole load of benchmarks.

There are reviews that people actually play the games. They've reported no issues. The latency benches are just more numbers.
 

BrightCandle

Diamond Member
Mar 15, 2007
4,762
0
76
Kyle has actually mentioned it in the past. I too have mentioned that single cards stutteredvlong before this article was released. I noted that a single 680 was smoother than a 7970, because I could detect that it was.

So its not fair to say no one has seen it, just very few have. My guess is that the amount of stutter you typically see is not high enough for the grand majority of people to notice or be bothered by it. But everyone's experienced will be improved when its fixed.
 

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
Kyle has actually mentioned it in the past. I too have mentioned that single cards stutteredvlong before this article was released. I noted that a single 680 was smoother than a 7970, because I could detect that it was.

So its not fair to say no one has seen it, just very few have. My guess is that the amount of stutter you typically see is not high enough for the grand majority of people to notice or be bothered by it. But everyone's experienced will be improved when its fixed.

Let's not be too literal. Obviously there are going to be some games, setups, graphics settings, etc. that people have noticed stuttering or a lack of smoothness at some point in time. I'm sure you know what I mean when I say no issues. That goes for both brands. Let's not take it to the realm of "never say never", or "anything is possible". I am speaking in practical terms.
 

Keysplayr

Elite Member
Jan 16, 2003
21,209
50
91
"Lets" see what AMD does to fix it's latency issues with GCN architecture. Will they smooth out the frame times and still hold on to the fps they are currently enjoying? Or will smoothing out frame times reduce them back to where they were pre 12.8's? Who knows? AMD probably does.
And 3DVagabond, could you perhaps force yourself not to care whether someone is "happy" about this situation or not? It really shouldn't concern you.
I'm referring to this:
"I'm not saying anything except that people shouldn't take something and simply apply whatever meaning to it that makes them happy."

People DO have eyes and people ARE seeing what is going on. These people DO include AMD staff as indicated by their response to the issue and a rework of memory communications (if that is indeed the problem. I say probably not and it's just fluff) due sometime in 2013 according to Baumann.

Just letting you know that even though you're attempting to steer this thread, there are more people with their eyes on the road than you think.
 
Last edited:
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |