Check the full press slides in the source. There's an interesting read there, even if there are those chuckle-worthy Intel comments that look like grappling at straws when real arguments are absent. But hey, that's this editor's interpretation. I reserve myself the right to be wrong, and to be slightly emotional at these underhanded tactics. It's just plain disrespectful for a company which stands on its engineers' shoulders to deride another's with no compelling argument.
Even Tom's Hardware, a historically Intel biased site is completely thrashing Intel for its "very cheap TIM". http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/-intel-skylake-x-overclocking-thermal-issues,5117-2.htmlYeah and Intel uses cheap paste to glue their lids on so they're hardly ones to talk.
Where's the source of these slides? I see him make remarks, "check the source" and "official Slide deck", but none is provided. Anybody can make a set of slides..
https://www.computerbase.de/2017-07/intel-xeon-skylake-sp-purley/3/#
Not all press agreed publishing what is basically FUD at its worst, an exemple below :
These are Intel's own slides from their press event. They are so embarrassingly bad that almost no press outlet presented them. Four of the slides are shown in TPU's article, for the rest follow the first source link at the bottom of the article:Where's the source of these slides? I see him make remarks, "check the source" and "official Slide deck", but none is provided. Anybody can make a set of slides..
Embarrassment begins at "Bild 45/78".
I have been into tech since about 2000 and I am not sure I have ever seen something look just so.. desperate. Cringe worthy indeed. How did Intel with its billions of dollars let AMD catch up to them? Reminds me of the story of Xerox... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1rXqD6M614These are Intel's own slides from their press event. They are so embarrassingly bad that almost no press outlet presented them. Four of the slides are shown in TPU's article, for the rest follow the first source link at the bottom of the article:
Embarrassment begins at "Bild 45/78".
Yes to both, according to the editor-in-chief of Computer Base. (google translate link)A. Are they actual Intel slides?
B. Is the info true?
Were there any slides comparing security features?
.
AMD does glue 4 chips together?Yes to both, according to the editor-in-chief of Computer Base. (google translate link)
Were there any slides comparing security features?
I suspect not, no doubt intel wants this to fly completely under the radar.
There s one comparing the RAM CHs count, fraudulously....
Yet the slide say SKU vs SKU...
I have been into tech since about 2000 and I am not sure I have ever seen something look just so.. desperate. Cringe worthy indeed. How did Intel with its billions of dollars let AMD catch up to them? Reminds me of the story of Xerox... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1rXqD6M614
How did Intel with its billions of dollars let AMD catch up to them?
Wow damage control much? It was dispersed to the press by Intel themself.. they are even on Anandtech.com. Relax dude.That's a BOGUS slide.. look at it.. The AMD crap on the side was added, and doesn't line up, fonts don't match etc..
BOGUS! PROPAGANDA! FUD indeed.. Conjured up slides to stir public attention and paint intel in a bad light.. Those slides don't show up anywhere on intel's site. Intel just wouldn't do that.
I'm surprised at you Abwx.. I expect it from csbin, but not you!
This BOGUS thread should be moved to P&N. It is just click bait.
That's a BOGUS slide.. look at it.. The AMD crap on the side was added, and doesn't line up, fonts don't match etc..
BOGUS! PROPAGANDA! FUD indeed.. Conjured up slides to stir public attention and paint intel in a bad light.. Those slides don't show up anywhere on intel's site. Intel just wouldn't do that.
I'm surprised at you Abwx.. I expect it from csbin, but not you!
Intel Xeon SP vs. AMD Naples (Bild: Intel)
Indeed. Back in the Athlon days Intel wouldn't even mention AMD. Truly shows just how threatened they are by Ryzen.