Technotronic
Junior Member
- Jul 12, 2017
- 23
- 78
- 41
Wow.. They take a $500 desktop processor.. downclock it by 50% and compare it to a $2000 server CPU. Damn Intel.. they must be horrified!
AMD Naples
Repurposed Desktop Dies for Server
4 glued-together desktop dies
Its just dirty marketing at its finest. Sure some companies feel the need to engage in that but when you have 90% of the market its pretty alarming they use flat out wrong language like that.I'd love to know how they determined that Zeppelin is a "desktop die".
Anyone who knows it's features also knows that Zeppelin is infact a server design, barbe à queue.
Wow.. They take a $500 desktop processor.. downclock it by 50% and compare it to a $2000 server CPU. Damn Intel.. they must be horrified!
Maybe Intel can borrow some of this glue to swap for skylake x TIM?Apparently, AMD is using some excellent glue...
Sorry, but it had to be said...
They still "wouldn't" ..
Look at the bogus slides that ARE NOT LISTED AT INTEL all you want! They are NOT from intel.
Were there any slides comparing security features?
I suspect not, no doubt intel wants this to fly completely under the radar.
https://translate.google.com/transl...se.de/2017-07/intel-xeon-skylake-sp-purley/3/They still "wouldn't" ..
Look at the bogus slides that ARE NOT LISTED AT INTEL all you want! They are NOT from intel.
I got your damage control swinging.. How about TRUTH control?
Computerbase.de said:AMD already lied several weeks ago Intel with benchmarks, which represented Naples alias Epyc as significantly stronger than Intels Xeon . The predecessor Broadwell-EP was always used. With Skylake-SP , the cards are remixed and Intel returns to its presentation. As part of a press workshop in mid-June at Intel's server headquarters in Hillsboro, Oregon, an entire hour of the first day was dedicated to the comparison with AMD Naples.
Even more damaging is Anandtech, while using an EPYC platform with lower specced RAM posted this:OUCH!
I don't know what is going on at Intel, but this all looks like amateur hour. Seriously.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/11544/intel-skylake-ep-vs-amd-epyc-7000-cpu-battle-of-the-decade/15On average, both Xeons pick up about 20% due to SMT (Hyperthreading). The EPYC 7601 improved by even more: it gets a 28% boost on average.
The slides are shown on page 3 of Computerbase's SKL-SP launch article. You won't find them among the material of Intel's July 11 webcast, because they were presented by Intel to invited press at a series of workshops in Hillsboro, mid of June, i.e. a month ahead of the launch.Why aren't these slides available/viewable on Intel's site, in either Press workshop or otherwise? The aforementioned slides do NOT appear in the link above.
Not to mention that Intel has probably quickly learned of the backlash from communities like ours and deleted/won't upload the slides to its website now. Only problem.. they can't force the tech press to redact the slides now that they are in the public domain!Which of these scenarios do you think is most probable?
1) An embargoed slide deck with an embargo date < 24 hours old is not yet loaded onto the website
2) Volker Rißka, a respected tech journalist and editor at ComputerBase.de got duped into publishing fake slides
3) Intel redacted/removed certain slides before publication, as they were intended for in-person audience only
I don't know either, but until proven otherwise I'd lean towards #1
How pathetic of Intel, but this isn't out of character for them. Inferior products, superior marking: Intel
while using an EPYC platform with lower specced RAM posted this:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/11544/intel-skylake-ep-vs-amd-epyc-7000-cpu-battle-of-the-decade/15
Intel had superior products for pretty much every metric that mattered for the past decade until AMD's Zeppelin-based products launched. Superior marketing or not, the giant has grown accustomed to not having to play defense.
I just bought another (yes, my third) "glued together" Ryzen 1700 CPU for $265 shipped after CC cashback. It wasn't but four months ago that a quality quad core cost around that price. Today, thanks to AMD returning to competition I can afford a server-first design octa-core for the same money. More energy-efficient crunching power for the TeAm, FTW.
Your post comes off as a little frantic and aggressive. A calm look at this and the reputable sites circulating these slides would indicate they are indeed real.They still "wouldn't" ..
Look at the bogus slides that ARE NOT LISTED AT INTEL all you want! They are NOT from intel.
I got your damage control swinging "dude".. How about TRUTH control?
Intel had superior products for pretty much every metric that mattered for the past decade until AMD's Zeppelin-based products launched. Superior marketing or not, the giant has grown accustomed to not having to play defense.
I just bought another (yes, my third) "glued together" Ryzen 1700 CPU for $265 shipped after CC cashback. It wasn't but four months ago that a quality quad core cost around that price. Today, thanks to AMD returning to competition I can afford a server-first design octa-core for the same money. More energy-efficient crunching power for the TeAm, FTW.
Please enlighten us on what you've seen that the rest of us mere mortals couldn't.Look at the slides in question.. Easily visible BOGUS slides!
Again.. Show me an intel link..
The slides weren't even the first time that Intel disparaged AMD's approach. An Intel spokesperson also called it "stitching together 4 desktop dies" back in June in a response to following article (added at its bottom): http://www.barrons.com/articles/amd-reveals-epyc-details-intel-vows-to-top-it-1497997334Your post comes off as a little frantic and aggressive. A calm look at this and the reputable sites circulating these slides would indicate they are indeed real.
Dude whether it's real or not you are coming across a bit desperate, it's not a good look.Oh come on people! LOOK at this slide.. Look at how anything in red doesn't line up, font size slightly different.. EASILY you can see the red section has been added..
I'm not a fan boy or anything else. If Cyrix made a cpu that I needed I would buy it, but I ALWAYS want the truth!
Just provide an intel link.. That's all ..
Sure, metaphorically speaking, just like Intel "glued" their dual cores back in 2005.AMD does glue 4 chips together?
Just provide an intel link.. That's all ..