i think what he is saying is, how can anyone be arguing freesync at this point. There is no way to compare it to gsync at all. With gsync we have an actual product that does what its advertized to do. You can test it and see it in action.
No one has seen freesync in action. Yet there are so many arguing its validity. How? We really dont know anything about it at all. We cannot see if it solves any of the problems Gsync does. Yet not only are some overly enthusiastic, they are actually claiming Gsync is dead because of the vaporware gsync. Would not a person with reason want to at least compare the two before making such bold claims?
This is how the world works....... Normally anyway. You dont blindly claim victory when you cannot possibly size the two up. In any way, shape or form.
Yet here we are. Multitudes of people hailing support for a product that not only doesnt exist, it is nowhere in sight.
And yet one thing that stands out to me. AMD claims they have no idea what nvidia thinks they are trying to fix. They say this while trying to talk up freesync. Its kinda like, huh? Obviously they are downplaying gsync, just like so so many on this thread. But if you dont even know what gsync attempts to address, then how the heck are you so certain that their competing product "freesync" can ever measure up to it? If there is no point in gsync, why are so many so interested in the supposed alternative?
Anyone with reason will want to see what freesync offers, if it ever comes out at all. There is no indication that it will work anything like gsync. And no reason for anyone to think that it will. Just blind faith. And a heck of a lot of it