werepossum
Elite Member
- Jul 10, 2006
- 29,873
- 463
- 126
Yup, missed that. Don't quite understand it either - the case would look the same locked or unlocked.You missed something. Look at the picture again.
He did not wrap the power cord around the latch. He broke the flipper thing off and wrapped a thin, black, insulated wire around it to keep it closed. I have the same case, this is very clear.
He claimed he closed it with a wire so they wouldn't think it was locked because -- if it looked(?!) like it was locked -- they might think it was suspicious.
From the kid's own mouth:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mW4w0Y1OXE#t=1m25s
Skip to 1m25s
He specifically says he wrapped it with a wire so it would look less suspicious. He knew it might be interpreted as a threat, added something that is a practically a hallmark for suspicious packages and IEDs, and somehow thought that would make it less suspicious.
As far as IEDs, their second most common attribute (after explosive force) is the intent to look like everything but an explosive device. So I don't know that comparison really gets us anywhere.
lol That's pretty funny coming from a guy whose every comment on every subject is straight doctrinaire progressive.It would be better if that were the case rather than simply being part of 'the collective' and working hard to spread the talking points of the day.
IF that happened. IF. Sometimes things are merely serendipity, and activist millionaires are generally well able to jump on any available opportunity.The fraud is in the planing, provocation and the subsequent money gathering based on a staged event, not the claim to have "invented" a clock. Dumbest forum evah