Originally posted by: DanTMWTMP
Originally posted by: MrMatt
Originally posted by: Jeff7
Returns with the ability to see more clearly.
Had she been blind before, she wouldn't have known the color green when she saw it, nor would she already be learning to drive. From what I've read of people who are blind from birth, and then given the ability to see, their brains just don't know what to do with the information. In one case I remember reading about, the person could be shown a cube and a 2D picture of a cube. He could see that there was something different about them, but he couldn't quite explain what it was.
many people who have surgeries to reverse blindness from birth want to go back to being blind. They can't navigate with sight. The thing about brain plasticity is that if you can't see from birth (for instance) the parts of your brain that account for vision will be allotted to other senses. So the person in your example probably had portions of their Occipital lobe dedicated to something besides vision and interpretation of shapes and depth.
it mentioned that she's not completely blind. So she could still see, but just not so much to even drive and such. I figured she'd be legally blind, otherwise, it's BS that she can adapt so quickly.
What was that movie with Val Kilmer where he was blind, but was able to see again? I think the movie showed enough material to understand what it is like for completely blind people to see. It was based off of a special case of a person in his 50s/60s (i forgot) who was able to see, but he was never able to focus, didn't know what shadows were, etc etc..
Anyways, that said, we still need to fund stem cell research aggressively. I want the US to be the number one country in the sciences and technology. To be held back from petty arguments is almost pathetic.