Are you, and I'm being absolutely serious here, clinically retarded? You just stated that a sexting teenager should be prosecuted.
That's the stupidest post I've ever seen on AT. And that's saying a lot.
No reasonable person gives a flying flip what a teenager does in private, alone - until they harm themselves. And no reasonable person can make such a ridiculous leap in logic.
That's the stupidest post I've ever seen on AT. And that's saying a lot.
No reasonable person gives a flying flip what a teenager does in private, alone - until they harm themselves. And no reasonable person can make such a ridiculous leap in logic.
BlabberFret is just upset because I've proven him wrong so many times in P&N that he's finally had to accept that he is mentally disabled.
I think he is just trying to redirect from his pro child pornography post. He's quite a disgusting sack of crap isn't he?
No reasonable person gives a flying flip what a teenager does in private, alone -
http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews/canada/archives/2013/04/20130412-080852.htmlThe RCMP is reopening its investigation into the Rehtaeh Parsons case "in light of new and credible information that has recently been brought forward to police."
In its press release, the RCMP emphasized its new information didn't come from an online source.
"The person providing the information is willing to verify who they are, the reason they're providing it and is willing to work with police," the release stated.
Sherri Bain, a friend of Rehtaeh's mother who launched a wildly popular petition calling for an inquiry into how police handled the case, welcomes the news.
"I think that is great that the RCMP is reopening the case. However, if we don't want this to happen again -- if we want real justice -- we need to find out why the RCMP did not lay charges in the first place," Bain said in a press release.
"The most devastating part of this whole situation was the failure of the justice system. If the police could have held the right people responsible the bullying would have stopped."
RCMP Commissioner Bob Paulson said earlier in the day the RCMP would be open to working with online hacker group Anonymous, but "they've got to take their masks off, sadly."
The group announced it found the names of four boys allegedly involved in the gang rape of the Cole Harbour, N.S., teen but wasn't planning to release the information.
Rehtaeh, 17, was taken off life-support Sunday after trying to hang herself in the bathroom of her home April 4.
Her parents said she was raped by four boys when she was 15, then bullied after photos of the attack circulated online.
"allegedly involved in the gang rape"Investigation is being reopened. I'm sure some of you will be crestfallen.
http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews/canada/archives/2013/04/20130412-080852.html
"allegedly involved in the gang rape"
Is it now legal fact that there was a gang rape?
Do you understand the difference between being the alleged suspect and the alleged crime?Do you understand the word allegedly ?
Like taking pictures of themselves?
Are you, and I'm being absolutely serious here, clinically retarded? You just stated that a sexting teenager should be prosecuted.
Prison? Of course not. You didn't really think I'd say yes, did you?So you think the 25% of teenage girls who are sexting should be thrown in prison for producing child pornography?
I wouldn't object to a lesser crime for teenagers who do it, as opposed to prosecuting them as adults. But there should still be consequences.
Are you, and I'm being absolutely serious here, clinically retarded? You just stated that a sexting teenager should be prosecuted.
I don't think the person who equates looking at oneself in a mirror as sexting has any room to point fingers.
Being alone with 4 boys and drinking heavily with them would qualify as a bad decision to me. Doesn't mean she consented. Doesn't mean she deserved what happened to her. But she did make a bad decision, it's just not the one that the would-be rapists in here are trying to claim.
Yes, bad decision. But that's not what ruined her life, as has been claimed.
It was the root cause.
Let me ask you something. When the other girl left, why didn't she leave as well? Why would she stay and drink with 4 guys unless she wanted to party with them?
BlabberFret is just upset because I've proven him wrong so many times in P&N that he's finally had to accept that he is mentally disabled.
The only thing your posting in P&N has ever proven is that we should in fact encourage more abortions. It's only too bad we didn't catch you sooner.
Do you understand the difference between being the alleged suspect and the alleged crime?
Who said she didn't want to party with them? And if she did, so what?
It implies consent. At what point did she decide she didn't want to have sex with them? Did she try to get away? Did she fight off her "attackers"? Did she say no? She was conscious the whole time. At what BAC are you no longer able to make decisions for yourself? She decided to get drunk and put herself in that situation. Doesn't that imply consent as well?
Even if she went to that location with a clear intent to have sex with any or all of them, she's free to change her mind at any time.
"allegedly involved in the gang rape"
Is it now legal fact that there was a gang rape?
Do you understand the word allegedly ?