What do you not understand about innocent until proven guilty?
Just because someone is on trial for defending themselves doesn't automatically mean you should demonize them, as many of you are doing here.
i understand innocent until proven guilty. do you understand that you can easily impeach a witness if there is self-interest involved - which is obviously the case here. We aren't demonizing anyone - you are using weak circumstantial evidence to exonerate the accused. I am only saying that the evidence is heavily against Dunn and this is overall a sad sad case for everyone involved.