Based on Geosurface's blatantly racist rant above, I'd say he's already having his.
Prove he's lying about the events that forced him to fire in self defense.
And no, somebody saying I deserved a good ass kicking does not lawfully allow deadly force.
But what absolutely does is multiple yelling aggressive verbal threats to life or great bodily harm and action to imminently carry out that threat as was shown by the evidence at trial.
There was no evidence provided at trial that Dunn was threatened except for his own testimony. In fact, just prior to Dunn's testimony, Judge Healey ruled that he would not give the jury the self defense instruction at that time. Which is why Dunn took the stand.
It was Jordan Davis who brought the only source of anger, conflict, or problem into all of this.
So you do admit there was evidence provided at the trial of Dunn's verbal threats and actions to act on that threat?
(Now couple that with bullet trajectories showing open door, testimony of people in car of Davis's escalation and aggressiveness, cursing at Mr. Dunn angrily, attempting to open door to carry out his threats on Mr. Dunn's life ALL of which back up the testimony by the esteemed Mr. Dunn)
So...what do you have to dispute this evidence?
Ummm.....no, the ME isn't guessing as to how the bullet entered and tracked. During an autopsy, a bullet's track is easily seen, but most people don't want to see the grisly pics that'd show it. But the X-ray shows the entry and final resting point of the bullet, which demonstrates the bullet's track through the body almost as well as showing autopsy pics.
And if the bullet struck no bone through it's travel in the body, again easily noted during the autopsy, then the only plausible explanation is that the body had to be leaning a certain way to get that bullet track. It certainly couldn't have happened with the victim standing unless the bullet struck bone, like the hip or ileac crest of the hip, and then ricocheted upward, which didn't happen.
The defense had every right to bring in their own experts to discount/disqualify the ME's testimony, yet they didn't. You don't find that odd? And why didn't the defense do that? Maybe because there's no defense against facts?
Did you actually read what I posted before you quoted and replied to it?
Also, a question: I don't recall that you're in the habit of referring to murder suspects as "the esteemed." Is there a particular reason that is motivating you to do that now?
What a fucking load of shit. He was in such a state of shock that he drove for a long time, had dinner, had some drinks and then slept for the night. Not once did he call the police.
He shot people, then ran for it hoping that nothing would happen. Also "idiotic liberalism" is apparently being unable to kill black people at will, the America that geosurface yearns to return too.
I have a soft spot for victims of violent crime. Even higher esteem when they save their own life.
First, no you don't. Second, regardless of what the verdict is, Dunn was not a victim of any violent crime.
You're just a lying little tool.
Expert testimony in court is effing expensive. Not everyone can afford that and it's not given out for free by the state either. Lack of experts on the defense side doesn't mean squat.
Assault and terroristic threatening are crimes.
Dunn's daddy is footing the bill for his defense.
I have a soft spot for victims of violent crime. Even higher esteem when they save their own life.
I know your ilk. You'd rather the woman get raped than actually defend herself.
Hypothetical - if a man told a woman "I'm going to drag you into the woods and rape you" and made a move towards her is she allowed to use deadly force before he even touches her?
The answer is yes of course.
Absolutely she would be allowed to defend herself. As I am a fervent supporter of both gun rights and women's rights, I would never say or think differently. As you already know that from my posts, you're just lying yet again. (For the record, my wife carries at my insistence).
And if she killed the would - be rapist, and ran off 180 miles to be forcibly apprehended by the police the next day, and then there was no evidence at trial but her own testimony, you would be arguing on here about how "the esteemed Mr would be rapist" was a good man and how that "bitch slut" deserved the chair.
Everyone knows this about you, spidey, so I'm surprised you even went there with this hypothetical.
Yeah, it has been pretty interesting to watch him become more and more invested as time goes on. If you look at his early posts and compare them to his current ones it is pretty clear that his emotions are spiraling out of control on this issue.
The thing is that he has a pretty consistent history of saying racist things on here. I genuinely don't get why he doesn't go find a board that shares his views.
Dunn's testimony is that he was pulled up with his driver's door at the level of the rear door of the SUV. He fired 3 shots at the rear door from the driver's seat of his car. Pause and the SUV began backing out the spot. 3 more shots, the angle of each consistent with the reversing vehicle. Then further pause, Dunn exits his car, the SUV completes backing out and is now accelerating away, 4 more shots at the right rear of the SUV.
This is the evidence.
Yeah, it has been pretty interesting to watch him become more and more invested as time goes on. If you look at his early posts and compare them to his current ones it is pretty clear that his emotions are spiraling out of control on this issue.
The thing is that he has a pretty consistent history of saying racist things on here. I genuinely don't get why he doesn't go find a board that shares his views.
He originally didn't know he hit anyone or killed anyone at the scene until the next morning. Then he acted stupid by not calling the cops for sure right then and there. But that is a side issue and not what is on trial nor does it really matter towards the outcome of the trial.
First, no you don't. Second, regardless of what the verdict is, Dunn was not a victim of any violent crime.
You're just a lying little tool.
I came to this conclusion through my own experience with gay friends when I was younger and way more liberal. Overtime I came to learn it's wrong, they're wrong, their behavior is wrong. Once a few of them started hitting on me and I beat the shit out of two of them I wanted nothing to do with gays anymore. It's wrong.
That's not how it works. What happened afterward has nothing to do with the actual actions/threat and self defense. You need to let go of your white guilt and face reality.
You would still have to disprove self defense. So far you haven't done that and neither has the prosecution.
Now the 3 shots afterwards towards the vehicle? Yeah, they can nail Mr. Dunn for that. Every bullet has a lawyer attached to it and all. But killing Davis is obviously self defense as shown by the evidence.