You invoked the word crime. Not me, chuckles.Not really, but I appreciate yours. You are correct. A bunch of alarmist whiners passing judgment on some kid is not the same as charging someone with a crime.
I took "facecrime" as a reference to "thoughtcrime" where Sandmann's only crime was a facial expression rather than a thought.You invoked the word crime. Not me, chuckles.
Or maybe it was something else. Hopefully he will elaborate.I took "facecrime" as a reference to "thoughtcrime" where Sandmann's only crime was a facial expression rather than a thought.
In Orwell's "1984" people guilty of thoughtcrimes (AKA "wrongthink") weren't charged with crimes either, or at least there was no record of it in the end. They were "unpersoned" as any record of their existence was literally re-written to eliminate them... press and fiction too.
Or maybe his point was that Sandmann is guilty of facecrime in the eyes of some here and that we are now raging against him with prescribed hate just like the "Two Minute Hate" in the same book.
Either way, I don't think his point had anything to do with actual criminal charges against Sandmann.
Or you could choose not to be a dickhead.
no you twit, it was the adult who came up to him and started banging a drum and screaming in his face. yes the kids is the victim here and shame on you for defending the puce of shit man who put the kid in the spotlight to begin with.
I do, but socialism doesn’t necessarily have a negative connotation.
@Jhhnn’s facecrime concern is simply Orwellian.
I am also glad we’re now celebrating that a judge was willing to excuse the press for misrepresenting facts to advance a click driven narrative.
If the media misrepresented an escalating situation that you did not instigate, I expect you would have similar chutzpah. I am sure when you were a teenager, you handled every situation thrown at you maturely.So, uhh, that wasn't a smirk? Of course it was. It says "Look at me, being a dick!" And, sure enough, people looked & didn't like what they saw. That's what wearing a MAGA hat is all about, isn't it? Being a dick. Methinks people who adopted "fuck your feelings!" as their motto don't have any room to complain when it comes back on them. But they have the chutzpah to sue for $250M when it does. I mean, such a tender & innocent young lad could be scarred for life!
Facecrime is a “newspeak” term from 1984. For people so concerned about fascism, some posters here certainly exhibit tendencies and behaviors that Orwell warned about. I thought that was evident. I forget who I am dealing with sometimes.I took "facecrime" as a reference to "thoughtcrime" where Sandmann's only crime was a facial expression rather than a thought.
In Orwell's "1984" people guilty of thoughtcrimes (AKA "wrongthink") weren't charged with crimes either, or at least there was no record of it in the end. They were "unpersoned" as any record of their existence was literally re-written to eliminate them... press and fiction too.
Or maybe his point was that Sandmann is guilty of facecrime in the eyes of some here and that we are now raging against him with prescribed hate just like the "Two Minute Hate" in the same book.
Either way, I don't think his point had anything to do with actual criminal charges against Sandmann.
If the media misrepresented an escalating situation that you did not instigate, I expect you would have similar chutzpah. I am sure when you were a teenager, you handled every situation thrown at you maturely.
Just admit the facecrime triggered you.
Why then did the WAPO release a lengthy editor’s note on a Friday at 5pm to “apologize” for their rush to judgment? WAPO prematurely released a salicious MAGA story based on incomplete information, and had to correct the narrative once more information came to light. WAPO also edited their original tweet. Drudge picked up on it, which is what started the counter narrative from the right.What misrepresentations did the WaPo make? Quotes & links are required. The court, in truth, determined that they did no such thing.
Why then did the WAPO release a lengthy editor’s note on a Friday at 5pm to “apologize” for their rush to judgment? WAPO prematurely released a salicious MAGA story based on incomplete information, and had to correct the narrative once more information came to light. WAPO also edited their original tweet. Drudge picked up on it, which is what started the counter narrative from the right.
The judge in this case gave broad benefit of the doubt to the press. I am sure you won’t complain at all when Fox News does the same.
You just described Sandman's actions perfectly. Goebbels would be proud of the way you accused the other side of that which your side is guilty.
No, I'm not clicking that vid.
Once again, only one party in this conflict faces the possibility of any consequences of law. Let's try to dial down the hyperbolic stupid, eh? Public opinion cannot be a crime. That would be in fact Orwellian.Facecrime is a “newspeak” term from 1984. For people so concerned about fascism, some posters here certainly exhibit tendencies and behaviors that Orwell warned about. I thought that was evident. I forget who I am dealing with sometimes.
Has any 'conservative media' ever issued a correction for anything ever? Serious question.wapo corrected themselves because they are a real news org who when making mistakes publish corrections. Find that in any right wing retard news? You wont, because they are grifters making money off the broken brains of boomers.
The only hyperbolic stupidity I see is internet tough guys wanting to punch some teenager in the face because they’re triggered by a hat and a facial expression.Once again, only one party in this conflict faces the possibility of any consequences of law. Let's try to dial down the hyperbolic stupid, eh? Public opinion cannot be a crime. That would be in fact Orwellian.
Another way of looking at it is that they rushed to judgment, which raises the question of why such a reputable news agency would dabble in tabloid reporting. The only reason they made the correction is that the social media tide turned against the narrative.wapo corrected themselves because they are a real news org who when making mistakes publish corrections. Find that in any right wing retard news? You wont, because they are grifters making money off the broken brains of boomers.
He served our country , more than you've ever done.Nathan Phillips returns. What a coward.
He served our country , more than you've ever done.
Nathan Phillips returns. What a coward.
Maybe there was a time he was a great patriot, a great American. But it is in the past if so.
define patriot.
A patriot is someone that loves their country and takes constructive efforts to improve it. Not someone that burns a flag and kneels for the anthem, not people willing to erode our rights that they don't care for, not people that stop free speech, not people that demand society pay for their poor decisions, not people that actively try to cause net negative to society - things like blocking traffic, etc. etc.