Since my home is approaching 20 years old and I have a wooded lot, I got four estimates for termite prevention treatment. Three were your standard fare "We'll dig a trench around the house, do the treatment and guarantee no termites for 5-8 years (depending on the contractor)". Then there's Terminix. Their proposal was for me to basically pay them about $30/month indefinitely. In turn, they would do absolutely nothing until there were signs of termites at which point they'd do their treatment and supposedly pay for any repairs. So in essence they're offering a kind of wacky termite "insurance". Do people really sign up for this?
Here's the problem: If you were to sell your house, law requires you to disclose to prospective buyers the details of any pest infestations and treatments made while you owned the house. Now, play the role of a homebuyer in today's market. Even though you probably have your choice of a dozen houses, let's say there are only two:
- House A had a routine treatment for termite prevention 4 years ago but had no signs of infestation.
- House B had a termite infestation and subsequence treatment and repairs 4 years ago.
After learning this, would you still consider house B? Would you bother doing the due diligence to make sure the contractors hired to do the repairs were qualified and that the proper permits and inspections were obtained if the repairs were structural (perhaps going as far as bringing in your own contractor/engineer to re-examine what was done)? Would you take this past problem into account when putting together an offer price? Or would you play it safe and simply red-flag the house and move on?
These kind of pest insurance policies are wonderful from the pest company's point of view but I cannot imagine homeowners would agree to them. Ridiculous.
Here's the problem: If you were to sell your house, law requires you to disclose to prospective buyers the details of any pest infestations and treatments made while you owned the house. Now, play the role of a homebuyer in today's market. Even though you probably have your choice of a dozen houses, let's say there are only two:
- House A had a routine treatment for termite prevention 4 years ago but had no signs of infestation.
- House B had a termite infestation and subsequence treatment and repairs 4 years ago.
After learning this, would you still consider house B? Would you bother doing the due diligence to make sure the contractors hired to do the repairs were qualified and that the proper permits and inspections were obtained if the repairs were structural (perhaps going as far as bringing in your own contractor/engineer to re-examine what was done)? Would you take this past problem into account when putting together an offer price? Or would you play it safe and simply red-flag the house and move on?
These kind of pest insurance policies are wonderful from the pest company's point of view but I cannot imagine homeowners would agree to them. Ridiculous.