Tess Holliday: 250 lb model

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

SMOGZINN

Lifer
Jun 17, 2005
14,260
4,500
136
you're not alone, but the standards here related to certain topics have always been shit sadly.

But the misogyny in specific has greatly increased in the last few years. There was a time when someone could post something about a woman without it degenerating into flat out misogynistic slurs, but now that seems to be considered normal behavior.
Even in the Discussion Club subforum, a subforum that is supposed to be held to a higher standard, we have outright misogynistic slurs being used with impunity.

Yes
Taking the stance that there can and should be more than one opinion on something REQUIRES debate and criticism on any subject.
This applies to any topic

I believe that Platypus used the wrong word here, criticism in the form of debate is called for, but much of this is not criticism but personal insults and misogynistic slurs.
 

Platypus

Lifer
Apr 26, 2001
31,046
321
136
The mention of fat shaming. You had said it's been a while since we had a fat shaming thread. Actual Fat Shaming isn't about beauty per se, it's about calling out weak people for being morbidly obese and thinking it's ok. Being that obese IS shameful. However, obese people are campaigning to make it a negative thing so that they don't have to feel bad about themselves. Instead they want to make the people who think their lifestyle is shameful feel bad about themselves.

Great definition from Urban Dictionary:

1) A term made by obese people to avoid the responsibility to actually take proper care of their body and instead victimize themself by pretending they're discriminated like an ethnic group. When confronted with someone like that they will ignore all the facts about obesity being unhealthy and pretend it's some sort of evil socially constructed conspiracy by teh patriarchy

2) fat shaming is the act of poking fun of someone for being overweight, or telling someone they are worthless, useless, lazy, or disgusting because they are overweight.
Like most terms, this has been adoptwisted by Radical Neofeminists to mean something very different. Under the RNF definition, it means " to make an overweight female feel in any way uncomfortable, usually by telling her anything is wrong with her weight."
This unfortunately includes Doctors telling them to lose weight for their health and suggesting diets or friends saying that their clothes are too tight, even men very politely refusing dates because they just don't find them attractive.


This girl could be an amazing beautiful person on the inside, but there's no way to spin it. She's embracing an unnattractive, unhealthy lifestyle and trying to convince us it's ok. It's not. It actually is shameful.

Shameful to you, subjectively. Her lifestyle is not shameful at all to me and if that's the way she chooses to live her life, then more power to her. There are a lot of people who find her attractive too. You should really learn how to accept that some things are subjective and some things are not. Is she objectively overweight and at greater risk for health problems? Yes. No one is disputing that fact anywhere here. Does that make her objectively 'unattractive' to every single person? No, no it doesn't.

And what's most amusing about the 'definition' posted is that it claims that they are pretending they are discriminated against. I think a single read through this thread handily proves how very real that discrimination is.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
19
81
No, we've raised an entire generation of women who feel ashamed of their bodies because they don't look like an airbrushed farce of a human skeleton. This directly relates to the alarming rate of growth of mental health disorders that carry their own stigma. Not everyone cares about being in shape or living to 80, who are you to judge what someone else does with their own lives?
...
Ever seen the build of lead males in action cartoons? I don't know of many people who look like He-Man. (And he might be arrested for public indecency with the outfit he usually wore.) Or Hellboy: Ron Perlman wore a "muscle suit" for that role, and I don't think there was much fanfare over that.
Hell, they could do a little post-processing to add six-pack abs to someone in a movie.

Yet that doesn't seem to get as much attention when it's that way around. Men or women, there are these unrealistic standard; it just seems to be viewed very differently when it comes to women, like everyone abruptly forgets that it's possible to edit photos or video, or that makeup can function like a mask.



And amusingly, if we have an entire nation of overweight people as you say, and this is all during the period where there was NO plus sized models whatsoever being shown, then how does your concern even make one bit of fucking sense at all? Shouldn't we all be rail thin and happy since that's what the advertisements told us?

I would say she's personally responsible for her actions and doesn't care what you think about them, hence her belief in this campaign. She's not blaming anyone for how she is, she's proud of it.

You didn't answer the tobacco/alcohol question either. Should those ads be banned as well so as not to promote such unhealthy lifestyles?
But how many people do you see who are proud of smoking-related lung cancer or alcohol dependency?
 

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
But the misogyny in specific has greatly increased in the last few years. There was a time when someone could post something about a woman without it degenerating into flat out misogynistic slurs, but now that seems to be considered normal behavior.
Even in the Discussion Club subforum, a subforum that is supposed to be held to a higher standard, we have outright misogynistic slurs being used with impunity.

I posit that women have become ever more contemptible in their attitudes and behavior. :biggrin:
 

Rakehellion

Lifer
Jan 15, 2013
12,181
35
91
All these "body positive" models are making a difference and all, but who's going to represent people with ugly faces?
 

SMOGZINN

Lifer
Jun 17, 2005
14,260
4,500
136
Ever seen the build of lead males in action cartoons? I don't know of many people who look like He-Man. (And he might be arrested for public indecency with the outfit he usually wore.) Or Hellboy: Ron Perlman wore a "muscle suit" for that role, and I don't think there was much fanfare over that.
Hell, they could do a little post-processing to add six-pack abs to someone in a movie.

Yet that doesn't seem to get as much attention when it's that way around. Men or women, there are these unrealistic standard; it just seems to be viewed very differently when it comes to women, like everyone abruptly forgets that it's possible to edit photos or video, or that makeup can function like a mask.

The standard is worse for women by a large margin. Ever notice how many average looking men are on TV? Ever notice that there wives on these shows are all well above average (unless they are supposed to be ugly as a part of a comedy).
The fact is that average looking women can't get a part in a TV show no matter their talent, while average or even ugly men can if they have the talent.

Women are for the most part the object being acted on, so it is their looks that mostly matter, while men are the actors so it is their acting that matters.




But how many people do you see who are proud of smoking-related lung cancer or alcohol dependency?
Maybe no cancer, but alcohol dependence is glorified all the time on TV.
 

TechBoyJK

Lifer
Oct 17, 2002
16,699
60
91
Shameful to you, subjectively. Her lifestyle is not shameful at all to me and if that's the way she chooses to live her life, then more power to her. There are a lot of people who find her attractive too. You should really learn how to accept that some things are subjective and some things are not. Is she objectively overweight and at greater risk for health problems? Yes. No one is disputing that fact anywhere here. Does that make her objectively 'unattractive' to every single person? No, no it doesn't.

And what's most amusing about the 'definition' posted is that it claims that they are pretending they are discriminated against. I think a single read through this thread handily proves how very real that discrimination is.

Shameful to most. And if she was actively trying to lose weight; that's awesome. But she's embracing it as if it's ok, and from a health standpoint it's not ok, at all. That's what's shameful. She might as well be saying I HAVE DIABETES AND THATS OK. No, it's not ok. It sucks that you have it, but it's not ok. It's a major health issue that a self respecting person would want to tackle head on. Instead they're hiding behind a small subset of deluded people who are whitewashing the problem for her so she won't feel guilty. It's all shameful. All those sores from diabetes on your legs?? you were born that way! Embrace it!

If I have diabetes yet I don't do anything to maintain it, and I start getting sick from it, and being a burden on everyone else... is that not shameful? I mean, imho, that's the definition of shame. Just like diabetes, her obesity is a major problem. It's an illness, it's an addiction, and encouraging morbidly obese people by whitewashing their problems isn't any better than handing an alcohol homeless person a fifth of vodka. You're letting them ruin their lives for the sake of 'protecting their feelings'. Well, in about 20 years, Tess isn't going to feel shit because she'll be dead.
 
Last edited:

88keys

Golden Member
Aug 24, 2012
1,854
12
81
On the subject of fat shaming....

I'd wager to say that most of us here who happen to be within the 'healthy(ish)' weight range owe their ability to stay within that range to their metabolism and nothing more. I've battled with my weight and I've nearly given up but along the way I've counted enough calories and read enough nutrition labels to know what is good and what is bad and I can assure you that 99% of you have no fucking clue what good healthy eating is or what regular portions are supposed to be. Does 2,000 calories sound like alot. Count up what you eat in a day and I'd be willing to bet that you're consuming around 3500 calories per day.

The single most damning statistic is that 90% of people who lose a significant amount of weight will gain it all back within 5 years. In reality a person's best hope is bariatric surgery where one would only have a 75% chance of regaining their weight.

Combine this with all of the pseudoscience and contradictory studies it isn't any wonder why people get frustrated.

The fact of the matter is that medical science doesn't really have much figured out when it comes to obesity and unfortunately this allows pseudoscience and snake oil remedies to flourish in the absence of real and effective medicine.

Granted diet and exercise is all you need is a true statement on a very superficial level. But it is mostly a lifestyle change. And more importantly it is a lifestyle that you won't be sharing with anyone else. It's much like kicking a drug habit and the people who are the most successful at kicking their habits are the ones who quit hanging around all of their drug addict buddies. But imagine trying to quit crack while you still live amongst crack heads. The fact is that we as a society like to eat and we like to eat like pigs and sometimes you'll have to be content with your salad and water while your friends are slamming burgers, hot dogs and beer.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
One has to wonder what's wrong with Platypus to be defending her...

Beauty comes in many forms, but as others have mentioned, the fact that she's actively "trying to change perceptions of beauty" to a body as horribly wrong as hers needs to be called out for the bullshit it is.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
On the subject of fat shaming....

I'd wager to say that most of us here who happen to be within the 'healthy(ish)' weight range owe their ability to stay within that range to their metabolism and nothing more. I've battled with my weight and I've nearly given up but along the way I've counted enough calories and read enough nutrition labels to know what is good and what is bad and I can assure you that 99% of you have no fucking clue what good healthy eating is or what regular portions are supposed to be. Does 2,000 calories sound like alot. Count up what you eat in a day and I'd be willing to bet that you're consuming around 3500 calories per day.

The single most damning statistic is that 90% of people who lose a significant amount of weight will gain it all back within 5 years. In reality a person's best hope is bariatric surgery where one would only have a 75% chance of regaining their weight.

Combine this with all of the pseudoscience and contradictory studies it isn't any wonder why people get frustrated.

The fact of the matter is that medical science doesn't really have much figured out when it comes to obesity and unfortunately this allows pseudoscience and snake oil remedies to flourish in the absence of real and effective medicine.

Granted diet and exercise is all you need is a true statement on a very superficial level. But it is mostly a lifestyle change. And more importantly it is a lifestyle that you won't be sharing with anyone else. It's much like kicking a drug habit and the people who are the most successful at kicking their habits are the ones who quit hanging around all of their drug addict buddies. But imagine trying to quit crack while you still live amongst crack heads. The fact is that we as a society like to eat and we like to eat like pigs and sometimes you'll have to be content with your salad and water while your friends are slamming burgers, hot dogs and beer.

Bull-fucking-shit.

Some of us get so tired of people making excuses. We know what makes people fat. Eating too much and moving too little. End of story.

The number of people whose weight aren't affected by those two things is a tiny majority of the number of obese people in this country. Are you one of them? Maybe, but as long as every 400 pounder tries to use the thyroid problem excuse, don't be surprised if people are skeptical.
 

SMOGZINN

Lifer
Jun 17, 2005
14,260
4,500
136
Bull-fucking-shit.

Some of us get so tired of people making excuses. We know what makes people fat. Eating too much and moving too little. End of story.

The number of people whose weight aren't affected by those two things is a tiny majority of the number of obese people in this country. Are you one of them? Maybe, but as long as every 400 pounder tries to use the thyroid problem excuse, don't be surprised if people are skeptical.

You are wrong. End of story.
Sometimes I wonder that people can really be that ignorant. I mean I know that some people are just born dumb, they really can't learn. But I would think that most people could stand on a street corner and learn that what you are saying is just plain stupid.

I could try to correct your ignorance with some real fact based and scientifically backed information, but it does not really matter, you choose to be ignorant.
 

Ns1

No Lifer
Jun 17, 2001
55,420
1,599
126
You are wrong. End of story.
Sometimes I wonder that people can really be that ignorant. I mean I know that some people are just born dumb, they really can't learn. But I would think that most people could stand on a street corner and learn that what you are saying is just plain stupid.

I could try to correct your ignorance with some real fact based and scientifically backed information, but it does not really matter, you choose to be ignorant.

You are wrong. End of story.

Fatties be fatties cuz they can't stop eating.
 

pauldun170

Diamond Member
Sep 26, 2011
9,248
5,277
136
I'm middle aged now.
I have no metabolism or luck or genetics on my side.
I'm in great shape because I've done my best to be in shape for most of my life. Do I expect my peers to be in shape I am? No. Reality is that there is an acceptable range that a healthy human can be in weight wise. There is a reasonable "under\over" for those that do have medical and emotional issues

I'm old enough to have seen the phases people go through. I've friends and acquaintances who have battled weight issues all their life. I know folks who did it through exercise and nutrition. I know those who did through nutrition alone.
People who have dropped 200lbs. People who fluctuate. People who went the surgery route. Those with thyroid issues. Hormone issues....everything.

There is one thing that is consistent about those the ones who stayed obese or returned to obesity.
They are the ones who talked themselves into "embracing the body they have"
They are the ones who are now dead. Suffering from Diabetes. Stroke. Hip and knee issues. I'm now old enough to see my peers start to drop off because of preventable diseases.

I know tthat its popular nowadays to "embrace everything because everyone is special and important and empower all thing things so they can blog\twitter blah blah blah..
Screw that

Obesity has a cost.
http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/health_equity/costOnHealthcareSystem.html
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9792474
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10147252
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/obesity-prevention-source/obesity-consequences/economic/
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/30/us-obesity-idUSBRE83T0C820120430
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
But the misogyny in specific has greatly increased in the last few years. There was a time when someone could post something about a woman without it degenerating into flat out misogynistic slurs, but now that seems to be considered normal behavior.
Even in the Discussion Club subforum, a subforum that is supposed to be held to a higher standard, we have outright misogynistic slurs being used with impunity.



I believe that Platypus used the wrong word here, criticism in the form of debate is called for, but much of this is not criticism but personal insults and misogynistic slurs.

Oh god damn, stop with the misogyny bullshit. What's problematic isn't the patriarchy but the efforts to try to normalize abnormal behavior.

Smokers get treated like shit, why shouldn't gluttons get the same?
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
You are wrong. End of story.
Sometimes I wonder that people can really be that ignorant. I mean I know that some people are just born dumb, they really can't learn. But I would think that most people could stand on a street corner and learn that what you are saying is just plain stupid.

I could try to correct your ignorance with some real fact based and scientifically backed information, but it does not really matter, you choose to be ignorant.



In other words, you got nuthin'.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
I'm middle aged now.
I have no metabolism or luck or genetics on my side.
I'm in great shape because I've done my best to be in shape for most of my life. Do I expect my peers to be in shape I am? No. Reality is that there is an acceptable range that a healthy human can be in weight wise. There is a reasonable "under\over" for those that do have medical and emotional issues

I'm old enough to have seen the phases people go through. I've friends and acquaintances who have battled weight issues all their life. I know folks who did it through exercise and nutrition. I know those who did through nutrition alone.
People who have dropped 200lbs. People who fluctuate. People who went the surgery route. Those with thyroid issues. Hormone issues....everything.

There is one thing that is consistent about those the ones who stayed obese or returned to obesity.
They are the ones who talked themselves into "embracing the body they have"
They are the ones who are now dead. Suffering from Diabetes. Stroke. Hip and knee issues. I'm now old enough to see my peers start to drop off because of preventable diseases.

I know tthat its popular nowadays to "embrace everything because everyone is special and important and empower all thing things so they can blog\twitter blah blah blah..
Screw that

Obesity has a cost.
http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/health_equity/costOnHealthcareSystem.html
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9792474
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10147252
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/obesity-prevention-source/obesity-consequences/economic/
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/30/us-obesity-idUSBRE83T0C820120430

How dare you post links to facts. Emotions are what matter, and the social justice warriors are going to go back to Tumblr and badmouth you if you don't grovel at the Altar of Beautiful Obesity.
 

edro

Lifer
Apr 5, 2002
24,326
68
91
I'm willing to bet obesity is inversely proportional to income and education, in the US.
Depression, inactivity, low cost food and ignorance of fitness and nutrition are all factors.

On the other hand, if you don't think genetics have much to do with obesity, you are the most ignorant of all.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
I'm willing to bet obesity is inversely proportional to income and education, in the US.
Depression, inactivity, low cost food and ignorance of fitness and nutrition are all factors.

On the other hand, if you don't think genetics have much to do with obesity, you are the most ignorant of all.

Genetics being involved does not absolve one of responsibility. Genetics likely has something to do with one's proclivity for any number of maladies, but that doesn't make them socially acceptable. If a person is genetically predisposed to obesity, eating properly and getting exercise becomes even more important and fat people need to stop using it as a crutch.
 

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
The standard is worse for women by a large margin. Ever notice how many average looking men are on TV? Ever notice that there wives on these shows are all well above average (unless they are supposed to be ugly as a part of a comedy).
The fact is that average looking women can't get a part in a TV show no matter their talent, while average or even ugly men can if they have the talent.

Women are for the most part the object being acted on, so it is their looks that mostly matter, while men are the actors so it is their acting that matters.

Maybe no cancer, but alcohol dependence is glorified all the time on TV.

The flip side of this is that women can become fantastically wealthy based on no other traits than their physical attractiveness. You've gotta take the good with the bad. You don't get all the privilege and none of the responsibility.

Fat women are trying to tear down attractive women and their positions in society because they feel that's easier than becoming like them. It's absolutely ridiculous. When men see a fit, ripped guy they don't think "gosh the darn media is pushing unrealistic body images on my poor fragile psyche!" We usually think, "I better hit the gym twice tomorrow," or "better lay off the pizza."

Unattractive women don't like that that attractive women get the world handed to them on a silver platter, so they're trying to change the standards of attractiveness. Rush Limbaugh nailed it years ago "feminism was established so as to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream of society."
 

Ns1

No Lifer
Jun 17, 2001
55,420
1,599
126
The flip side of this is that women can become fantastically wealthy based on no other traits than their physical attractiveness. You've gotta take the good with the bad. You don't get all the privilege and none of the responsibility.

Fat women are trying to tear down attractive women and their positions in society because they feel that's easier than becoming like them. It's absolutely ridiculous. When men see a fit, ripped guy they don't think "gosh the darn media is pushing unrealistic body images on my poor fragile psyche!" We usually think, "I better hit the gym twice tomorrow," or "better lay off the pizza."

Unattractive women don't like that that attractive women get the world handed to them on a silver platter, so they're trying to change the standards of attractiveness. Rush Limbaugh nailed it years ago "feminism was established so as to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream of society."

 

88keys

Golden Member
Aug 24, 2012
1,854
12
81
Bull-fucking-shit.

Some of us get so tired of people making excuses. We know what makes people fat. Eating too much and moving too little. End of story.

The number of people whose weight aren't affected by those two things is a tiny majority of the number of obese people in this country. Are you one of them? Maybe, but as long as every 400 pounder tries to use the thyroid problem excuse, don't be surprised if people are skeptical.


Translation: I have an opinion that is founded in ignorance and so I must express it in the most abrasive possible manner.


Tell me how much do you eat in a day. Like I said you're probably eating just as unhealthy as anyone else. You know that the CDC recommends no more than 25 grams of refined sugar per day and I'd bet you my last dollar that you've exceeded that by lunch time.

You are no better than anyone else and if you found yourself in a predicament where you had to lose weight and keep it off in the long term; statistically speaking you would most likely fail. This is coming from a person who has done it 4 times. I've made the changes and I know what it takes and I know that most people lack the will power to do it in the long haul and statistically speaking; I am right.

You can call people fat and lazy all day long, but it doesn't change the fact that you're a judgemental asshole.


Why don't you tell us about some of the big changes you have made in your life to make it better. It's not as easy as you think.
 

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
On the subject of fat shaming....

I'd wager to say that most of us here who happen to be within the 'healthy(ish)' weight range owe their ability to stay within that range to their metabolism and nothing more. I've battled with my weight and I've nearly given up but along the way I've counted enough calories and read enough nutrition labels to know what is good and what is bad and I can assure you that 99% of you have no fucking clue what good healthy eating is or what regular portions are supposed to be. Does 2,000 calories sound like alot. Count up what you eat in a day and I'd be willing to bet that you're consuming around 3500 calories per day.

The single most damning statistic is that 90% of people who lose a significant amount of weight will gain it all back within 5 years. In reality a person's best hope is bariatric surgery where one would only have a 75% chance of regaining their weight.

Combine this with all of the pseudoscience and contradictory studies it isn't any wonder why people get frustrated.

The fact of the matter is that medical science doesn't really have much figured out when it comes to obesity and unfortunately this allows pseudoscience and snake oil remedies to flourish in the absence of real and effective medicine.

Granted diet and exercise is all you need is a true statement on a very superficial level. But it is mostly a lifestyle change. And more importantly it is a lifestyle that you won't be sharing with anyone else. It's much like kicking a drug habit and the people who are the most successful at kicking their habits are the ones who quit hanging around all of their drug addict buddies. But imagine trying to quit crack while you still live amongst crack heads. The fact is that we as a society like to eat and we like to eat like pigs and sometimes you'll have to be content with your salad and water while your friends are slamming burgers, hot dogs and beer.

You've clearly bought into the Fat Acceptance tumblrina bullshit. Out of every study ever done on the human metabolism, the greatest variation in metabolism, controlling for weight (obviously those with large amounts of muscle or fat will consume more calories to maintain that weight,) was less than 300 calories. Most studies have the variance at around 100 calories per day. We're all very similar machines running on very similar chemical reactions governed by the very strict laws of physics. Telling yourself otherwise is a crutch and a lie.

I've tracked my calories before when attempting to purposely gain weight. It's a struggle for me to break 5,000 calories a day. Conversely, it's very easy for me to eat less than 2,000 calories a day and accidentally lose weight. It's all in your head. There are worse things to be than hungry. I can be hungry for days at a time with no real impact on my well-being or mental state.

That 90% of people will gain their weight back is the most ridiculous, quitter-encouraging nonsense I've ever seen, but all the fat acceptance people love to spout it every chance they get. As if change is impossible. Effort is pointless. Get the fuck out. I can gain 25lbs in 6 months and stay that size for a year, then lose that 25lbs in a month and stay that size for another year, then do it again. It's simple math and willpower. The study that they're quoting is a Finnish study of twins, in which the study's own author concluded that the differences in weight loss was entirely due to differences in exercise!

This is the problem with fat logic, fat acceptance, health at every size and all this other body acceptance garbage. It's preying on people who are already weak willed (the obese) by encouraging them to fail and telling them it's ok when they do. How despicable is that? How about we start dumb acceptance? You're not good at math? Fuck math! Just don't do it. We're all equal anyway! Oh wait, you don't know equal means because you blew off math. That's ok snowflake, you're just as good all the other kids, even though you didn't put in the effort but expect the same outcome as those who did.

:thumbsdown::thumbsdown::thumbsdown:
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |