- Oct 9, 1999
- 46,281
- 9,365
- 146
The lengths he's alleged to have gone to disgust me.
Take a few minutes to read the entire article. The evidence of malfeasance by this prosecutor is really detailed and strong.
I know this story has been discussed here some time before, mostly highlighting the totally bogus forensic evidence of arson that helped convict this guy, but the full extent of the felonious duplicity by the prosecutor was not then known.
Possibly the worst part, besides Gov. Rick Perry's decision to go ahead with the execution of a guy convicted in large part on what was even then demonstrated to be flawed forensic evidence? The fact that this DA may well get off with only a slap on the wrist.
Per the article:
On Wednesday it was reported that John H. Jackson has been formally accused of misconduct by the State Bar of Texas in the case of Cameron Todd Willingham. You may remember the Willingham story from David Grann’s epic and groundbreaking 2009 New Yorker article on the Corsicana father who was convicted in 1991 of murdering his three children by setting his home on fire. It turned out that the forensic evidence used to convict Willingham was completely bogus, but when this exculpatory information was presented to then-Gov. Rick Perry, he went ahead with the execution anyway. Willingham died at 6:20 p.m. on Feb. 17, 2004.
What’s perhaps more sickening than the neglected forensic evidence in this case is the other work that Jackson, the prosecuting attorney, did to win a conviction and see that Willingham’s every appeal was denied. These efforts include allegedly coercing and paying off a jailhouse informant to testify that Willingham had confessed to him, lying to the jury about whether the informant had been offered any benefits in exchange for his testimony, and withholding the informant’s recantation while Willingham sat on death row. Or, as the Marshall Project, which has been reporting on Jackson’s alleged misdeeds for the past year, described the state bar’s accusations: “obstruction of justice, making false statements and concealing evidence favorable to Willingham's defense.”
“Before, during, and after the 1992 trial, [Jackson] knew of the existence of evidence that tended to negate the guilt of Willingham and failed to disclose that evidence to defense counsel,” the state bar alleged in its formal complaint.
Take a few minutes to read the entire article. The evidence of malfeasance by this prosecutor is really detailed and strong.
I know this story has been discussed here some time before, mostly highlighting the totally bogus forensic evidence of arson that helped convict this guy, but the full extent of the felonious duplicity by the prosecutor was not then known.
Possibly the worst part, besides Gov. Rick Perry's decision to go ahead with the execution of a guy convicted in large part on what was even then demonstrated to be flawed forensic evidence? The fact that this DA may well get off with only a slap on the wrist.
Per the article:
Based on recent history, Willingham’s wishes may be too much to hope for. A different former Texas prosecutor, Ken Anderson, was given a 10-day sentence, with five days off for good behavior, for having withheld evidence that kept a man named Michael Morton wrongfully in prison for 25 years of a life sentence.