Originally posted by: playstation3
texas condones not allowing the justice system to be used as an entertainment and ratings generator under the guise of stopping little boy sex.
Originally posted by: Linflas
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: playstation3
Murphy Texas DA condones not allowing the justice system to be used to shine the light on public officials and good town folk that may have been implicated in little boy sex sting by meddling outsiders .</end quote></div>
Fixed it for you.
Originally posted by: Gooberlx2
If Dateline can't prove their logs are complete, authentic and initiated by the perps...then there's going to be a lot of appeals in the near future, since it seemed they were going to the houses of people who didn't show up to the meeting as well....at least that's how I read it.
Originally posted by: Queasy
Reading everything that happened in that article, I can certainly see why the prosecutor would have a hard time pursuing it. Many of these cases would be problematic at best with them not being in this DA's jurisdiction and NBC and the police unable to guarantee that chat logs were accurate and complete.
Originally posted by: josh0099
I see their point, on not wanting to lure them in, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't prosecute the guys they already have. Just never do the show in their city again that simple...
Originally posted by: rbV5
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: Queasy
Reading everything that happened in that article, I can certainly see why the prosecutor would have a hard time pursuing it. Many of these cases would be problematic at best with them not being in this DA's jurisdiction and NBC and the police unable to guarantee that chat logs were accurate and complete.</end quote></div>
Yea sure, thats what we've heard from all the other DA's around the county involved in the Dateline cases.:roll:
Originally posted by: Queasy
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: rbV5
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: Queasy
Reading everything that happened in that article, I can certainly see why the prosecutor would have a hard time pursuing it. Many of these cases would be problematic at best with them not being in this DA's jurisdiction and NBC and the police unable to guarantee that chat logs were accurate and complete.</end quote></div>
Yea sure, thats what we've heard from all the other DA's around the county involved in the Dateline cases.:roll:</end quote></div>
If a person chats online in another county and never enters this DA's county to meet up with underage boys/girls, how could he prosecute them? It would be the responsibility of the DA in the county that the accused person is from.
Originally posted by: Linflas
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: playstation3
texas condones not allowing the justice system to be used as an entertainment and ratings generator under the guise of stopping little boy sex.</end quote></div>
Fixed it for you.
Originally posted by: Sqube
So... it's alright to execute mentally challenged people, but we can't prosecute people who clearly came for the sole purpose of molesting underage boys and girls?
404: Understanding Not Found.
Originally posted by: Linflas
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: Sqube
So... it's alright to execute mentally challenged people, but we can't prosecute people who clearly came for the sole purpose of molesting underage boys and girls?
404: Understanding Not Found.</end quote></div>
Apple meet orange. Hyperbole aside I'm sure any lawyer here will tell you that there are a lot of legal requirements that need to be followed for a successful police sting. It is very easy to argue this strictly from an emotional point of view but this is a country of laws and like it or not a person accused of any crime no matter how heinous still has Constitutional rights. I would rather see the police conduct these stings in a way that ensures that a prosecutor can try the case and put these people away for the full amount of time allowed by law.